Big stove or small stove | Hearth.com Questions and Answers

Big stove or small stove - # 1982

Question:

A friend looked at the Napoleon 1400 and 1900 (non-cat) models and immediately told me to get the 1900 if it wasn’t terribly much more expensive.  When I asked why, he told me that it has a longer burn time and such you need to load it less often.  The 1400 has a 2.25 cubic feet fire box, the 1900 a 3.0 cubic fire box.  He said smaller hot fires could be used just as easily.

I’d heard earlier to not get too big a stove as small fires don’t heat it up enough and creosote is a problem.

Could someone comment and let me know which is the case?


Scroll down for Answer.....

Answer:

A smaller stove burning hotter is more efficient and easier to use, especially in a non-cat. The tradeoff is burn time, as your friend says.

However, a 3.0 cubic foot box is not extremely large, falls into the medium/large category. Most stoves today are from 2-4 cubic foot capacity.


Please rate this Question and Answer by clicking once on the Like or Dislike box!:
« BACK TO Q&A Search
GO TO Hearth.com HOME »