Fiskars Splitting Axe,Best length for my height

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.
well, I like the X 25 it works good, and I think it gives me a little more control than a longer handle.

Maybe they should make the handles like this ;lol
ergonomic-snow-shovel.jpg
 
Bingo. So we differ on where the returns diminish.

Tell you what - get yourself an X17 (formerly known as the Pro Splitting Ax). If it does not split as well or better than your 36" 8lb maul I will gladly send you a MO for the purchase price.

I have both the long and the shorter fiskars. I am much happier with the performance of the longer one. Save your money.
 
You have the one with a 2.25lb head and 24" handle? Rilly?

Yes. It was the only one available in my area at the time. I now keep it in my utility truck for some emergencies.
Later I found the longer 4.4 pound version in a hardware store several hundred miles from here and bout it on the spot.
 
Yes. It was the only one available in my area at the time. I now keep it in my utility truck for some emergencies.
Later I found the longer 4.4 pound version in a hardware store several hundred miles from here and bout it on the spot.

You have used and own both, eh. . . you are a rare specimen, indeed.

Next question: does your preference for the longer handle have anything whatsoever to do with your height?
 
You have used and own both, eh. . . you are a rare specimen, indeed.

Next question: does your preference for the longer handle have anything whatsoever to do with your height?

I doubt it. I didn't say you were incorrect about the height.
 
Right, until you were made to concede, by me, that at a certain length handles become unwieldy and inefficient.

What length is that, BTW? And how do you know?

Well, let's see. For the first 30 years or so I split wood with a 36" 8 pound mail.
Eventually I found that a certain axe, with half that head weight could split better than the maul, and leave me less tired.
Since I know from experience that if I have to, I can swing an 8 pound head 3 feet out, it is a given that the 4.4 pound head can also be readily swung 3 feet out, and clearly it strikes that much harder 3 feet out than 2 feet out.
 
longer is better! maybee bigg_redd believes smaller is better because thats what his wife keeps telling him to not hurt his feelings!:p nah im just kidding. I think the longer handle is better but never used the smaller one so?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boog
I first bought the X25 and thought the handle was too short, so I sprang for the X27 as soon as it was available. I am 5'-10" tall and when I'm splitting and get into the groove, I have found that the X25 feels better when using a stump/block to split on. Now, when a crotchy, knotty piece sneaks onto the stump I sometimes have to break out the X27 for the bit of extra explosive swing that can go into it. My X25 and a sledge/wedge make good wood.
 
I've heard the term "kinetic chain sequence" when people discuss the mechanics of pitching. It's basically the idea that different parts of the body "unwind" like a whip cracking. The same physics must apply to swinging an axe. Each person has different physical dimensions and style of swing, so each person probably has a theoretical best handle length and head weight. I own both lengths and prefer the 28in axes, I feel like I'm getting a sharper faster "whip crack". I'm 5 feet 8 inches and use a splitting stump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.