Theoretical question about masonry heaters

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Beetle-Kill

Minister of Fire
Sep 8, 2009
1,849
Colorado- near the Divide
The thought just popped up in my head. If you built a masonry heater and then a house around it, would there be any benefit to designing a secondary air system into the heater? Since they burn all out, would the secondaries add or detract from smoke output/ build-up in the stove? Just curious. JB
 
I think you want all the heat to travel through the labrynth of flue so the heat can be absorbed by the masonry, a baffle and/or secondary air system would prevent a lot of the heat from travelling.
 
Would the air drawn in and burned in a secondary tube(s) really cause that much heat loss?
 
Honestly, I've not dug into the designs too much, but I haven't run across a secondary air supplement/design so far.
The desired result would be as little smoke from the flue as possible, for as short a duration of the burn as possible.
I don't have a clue, that's why I ask. JB
 
Honestly, I've not dug into the designs too much, but I haven't run across a secondary air supplement/design so far.
The desired result would be as little smoke from the flue as possible, for as short a duration of the burn as possible.
I don't have a clue, that's why I ask. JB
I havent either thats why I replied as I did, maybe they would work better but cost more or maybe they dont make enough difference to bother.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.