Aesthetics versus Performance

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

lumbering on

Feeling the Heat
Dec 7, 2012
482
New York
We had a bit of a cold snap this week, and I was sitting there thinking about how nice a fire would be.

There was no need to heat the whole house, just take the chill off the living room for a few hours.

It was then I realized that all this research I've been doing into maximum burn times, heat storage, etc was neglecting the fact that I miss my fireplace at times.

I miss the sound, the smell, everything else that goes along with it besides the heat. And for nights like this, being able to convert to open door viewing suddenly became important to me.

So while I am deeply torn between the hyper efficient Woodstock hybrids, and the Jotuls with their open door viewing options, I am wondering...

Who else would sacrifice day to day performance for the occasional open door viewing option?
 
Large glass door offers a good view of the fire.
Sound of the snapping and crackling of the fire.
Heat.

Not having a fire place or a screen is not missed by me . . . I get plenty of ambiance (and good heat . . . even on these days when I just need to take the chill out of the air) with a regular ol' woodstove with a closed door.
 
PE Alderlea series have a screen door option. I didn't get that option and I've never seen it, but it is an option. Viewing through the glass is just fine with me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PapaDave
Wide open burning is really uncommon. Many of us have bought a stove screen only to have it gather dust after trying it once or twice. I would place this priority even below having an ash pan on a stove.
 
My lopi had an option for a screen but I never used it. I guess I'm not the best to answer this question since my living room still has a natural fireplace and the family room has the stove. Of course it's been two years since I've used the fireplace, it's just not worth the hassle for cleaning it after I use it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Backwoods Savage
That is one thing I like about having a cat stove, you have the option of opening up the bypass which tends to be in the back of the stove and build a small fire, you could put one of those fireplace screens in front of it with the door open.

Having said that, I have never actually done it. With the youngsters running around mama bear would have a conniption.
 
I had a screen I could put in front of the open doors on the old insert I had in my fireplace before I replaced it this year with the new Jotul F 600. Once in a blue moon I might use the screen so I could see the fire since the insert had solid cast iron doors with no glass. With the large glass viewing area in the Jotul I'm not tempted in the least to have the doors open for viewing. I don't miss the open fire in the least.
 
The reason I got the screen option with the Summit was that with the Century when I was getting a fire started (cold start) it might take a little while to get it going and you really needed the door open to get it going. Sometimes I might need to walk away for a few minutes to do something else and there'd be times I might forget for 1/2 hour or more if I didn't set a timer. Now when you do -- walk away with the door open-- the only way that's acceptable is with a fire screen. So I just felt it was the safer thing to do -- have the firescreen.

Turns out I'm better at starting fires now and the Summit has a better air supply system and can have the door closed much sooner than the Century when you're cold starting a fire, so it seems much less necessary and I've only used if for that a couple times in the couple months I've had it.

Still I'm not sorry I got it. . . Yet.
 
When I purchase a stove, it is the end result that is the biggest factor and that is, will it keep the house warm? After that comes the beauty (or lack thereof) of the stove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PapaDave
I do. I know exactly what your talking about and feel the need to be 'closer' to the fire too. I don't have a screen for My Oslo, but when I do need to have the door open I'm always right there with it. Usually with a beer and the dogs and wife nearby too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lumbering on
thanks for directing me to this thread from mine. I have to say...the thought of having an open fire is really tempting. I just got in from the pond with the fire pit and I just love it. of course I am not needing to heat the entire house with the little fire pit so inefficiency be damned. I think the screen is going to win out.
 
An open fire is nice but it's really defeating the purpose of having a fire to begin with. The upwards draft is going to steal a lot of the heat you're trying to produce, looks nice but not for me. I work too hard between the hauling, stacking, etc to just see my effort go up in smoke. I also heat my entire house with my stove and use zero supplemental heat sources, so keeping the heat in is a must for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PapaDave
I think I need to clarify re the loss of efficiency.

I'm not talking about the loss of efficiency that occurs when burning with the doors open.

What I really mean is, when deciding on which stove to purchase, who would choose a stove that was less efficient (when used correctly with the doors CLOSED) than your 2nd choice if the less efficient stove also gave you the option of burning doors open from time to time.
 
. . .What I really mean is, when deciding on which stove to purchase, who would choose a stove that was less efficient (when used correctly with the doors CLOSED) than your 2nd choice if the less efficient stove also gave you the option of burning doors open from time to time?
Not I. I get all the ambiance I need while basking in the glow of a mesmerizing secondary burn with the radiant heat soaking into my bones and the stove room ~ 80°F.:cool:

I'd bet that, if you found the right stove for you, you'd soon forget all about messing with a screen door. You might use it a few times a year. . .not worth factoring into the stove choice. I might get the screen if it was free with the stove that was my first choice, but it would just gather dust, as BG's and others' do, so I'd probably try to get ~ $100 off instead of a free screen.==c

Maybe do a fire pit in the back yard to get your open fire fix?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gark
An open fire is nice but it's really defeating the purpose of having a fire to begin with. The upwards draft is going to steal a lot of the heat you're trying to produce, looks nice but not for me. I work too hard between the hauling, stacking, etc to just see my effort go up in smoke.

I couldn't live with a system in my living room where I didn't at least see the flames. This is why I am so interested in the use of heating mass. I love an open fire but hate the waste of heat.
 
I miss the cracking/snapping sounds sometimes and plan on getting the screen for spring and fall when I just need chll out of the main living area - will get the stove hot and then pop in the screen to enjoy the fire noises. I know that in the cold of the winter that the screen defeats the whole puropose
 
  • Like
Reactions: lumbering on
We bought the optional screen for our NZ3000 fireplace when we bought the unit. Now that it's in, you can't even use the screen. Due to the design of the secondary assembly, top baffles and "smoke shelf" area on the stove, it will pour smoke into the room if you leave the doors open.....:(

Which is a bummer, because we, too, like the crackling and popping of an open fire once in a while. I plan on trying to make some kind air venturi that I can put up into that area to assist in the draft to pull the smoke up the pipe. I'm still in the "design" stages of that project (all inside my head).....==c
 
I miss the cracking/snapping sounds sometimes and plan on getting the screen for spring and fall when I just need chll out of the main living area - will get the stove hot and then pop in the screen to enjoy the fire noises. I know that in the cold of the winter that the screen defeats the whole puropose

That's just what I mean. In the spring or fall, just to take the chill off the living room, and enjoy the fire.
I would never dream of doing that in the dead of winter.
 
We had a bit of a cold snap this week, and I was sitting there thinking about how nice a fire would be.

There was no need to heat the whole house, just take the chill off the living room for a few hours.

It was then I realized that all this research I've been doing into maximum burn times, heat storage, etc was neglecting the fact that I miss my fireplace at times.

I miss the sound, the smell, everything else that goes along with it besides the heat. And for nights like this, being able to convert to open door viewing suddenly became important to me.

So while I am deeply torn between the hyper efficient Woodstock hybrids, and the Jotuls with their open door viewing options, I am wondering...

Who else would sacrifice day to day performance for the occasional open door viewing option?

Not me. Not even a little. Ever.
 
I like having a fire in the fall, even when one is sometimes not needed. Our heavy stone house soaks up heat all summer, and seems to radiate it back on cold nights all fall. When we have a house full of people and a turkey going all day in the oven on Thanksgiving, the house is plenty warm, but I still want to see a fire. In either case, out comes my Jotul open door screen. It satisfies me.

By spring, after loading two stoves 3x per day all winter, I couldn't care less about looking at or hearing a fire.
 
If you like watching the fire I have found that using the screen during startup and bringing the stove up to a temp that the secondarys will work keeps the window Kristol clear use it every startup
 
Status
Not open for further replies.