Time to replace the Century...with what?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

jrypka

New Member
May 23, 2012
6
Folks,

Wonderful site here. Lots of great info and knowledge. I was hoping I could get some of that knowledge directed to my particular situation! :)

I've got a Century FW3000007 that the firebrick is shot and that I've managed to burn a hole in the baffle. (Yes, probably an overfire...though 10yrs out of that stove probably isn't bad.) Rather than repair, I think I want to replace. I visited the only dealer in the area yesterday and talked to him for a while, and thought I'd see what you folks thought.

First of all, the house is considered a 1.5 story. It is 1100sf on the main floor. The living room/kitchen area is open floor plan, and I have a short hallway leading to the bathroom and two bedrooms. The upper floor is a loft over the kitchen and a master bedroom over the two first floor bedrooms. The area above the first floor living room is open with a ceiling height of about 18 feet. We have a ceiling fan to move the air around. The Century heated the open spaces quite well, and was difficult to damp down enough to provide long slow burns and still keep temps in the low 70s. The master bedroom heats fairly well when we leave the door open. The two lower bedrooms don't heat that well, but they are typically unused and we can supplement that with the HWBB oil boiler when needed. So really, the layout is pretty good for a woodstove I think.

Secondly, we live in south central Alaska. We typically get 1 week of -30 or colder lows, and Jan highs are typically around 0. But, the house is well insulated and fairly tight (5-star energy rating) and the Century didn't have a problem keeping us warm. The main problem with the Century was we had a cold firebox every morning, even when damped all the way down.

Which leads me to my third point: wood. We basically have 3 species available: spruce, birch, and aspen. I don't burn any aspen unless a tree falls in the front yard, and birch is pretty hard to come by, so I am mostly burning spruce. Some of it is dead-standing beetle kill that dries quickly, and burns hot but quick with no coals left over. My 10 acres of land is all black spruce with max diameter in the 6-8" range. I'm clearing land for pasture, so I want to burn that rather than waste it, but most of it is too small to split and it takes forever to dry in the round. So, in summary, our wood situation kinda sucks.

I think the most difficulty we'll have with a new stove is damping it down to prevent overheating, especially during the very long shoulder seasons (we had two small fires last week just to bump the house temp back up). But with a non-cat, the dealer said we wanted at least a 3.0 CF box to make sure we had enough room for wood so that we'd have hot coals in the morning. We haven't had any problem getting enough heat even on the coldest days.

My goal with the new stove is to be able to keep a fire all night without heating us out so that we have coals in the morning to load on top of.

The dealer showed me 4 stoves:
1) Blaze King Princess - $3100
2) Alderlea T6 - $3100
3) Jotul F50 - $2700
4) Harmon TL300 - $2200 (used one seaon)

(All 4 quoted prices are with blowers. Regardless, they all seem pretty high.)

Blaze King Princess: I've talked to people that have them and love them, especially for the long burn and not overheating. The only Cat stove he had. Probably my first choice, but I don't like the price.

Alderlea T6: Nothing really grabbed me about this stove. I didn't see much value in the swing-out warmer plates, and was thinking this might cook us out and not sure we'd get the burn time we wanted.

Jotul F50: I really liked the grill accessory. Never used a TL before, but think it might be the way to go. Again, not sure a non-cat would give us what we are looking for regarding burn time and temp control.

Harmon TL300: Biggest concern is the down draft and how some folks seem to think it is pretty particular on what it burns and on draft. Knowing that our wood isn't the best, and that the small black spruce in the round isn't always cured the best, I'm not sure how well the after burner will work. Worreid we might get smoked out or just get poor performance. Also not sure I want to drop $2200 on a used stove, though he said it would come with a warranty. And I guess after my first fire, it is used anyway! :)

So, with that information, what do you folks think might be my best option. (And sorry for such a long post!)

Jeff
 
I'd go with the Princess.

The F50 (2.8-ish cu ft), T6 (3 cu ft), TL300 (3 cu ft) and the Princess (2.8 cu ft) are very close in size in terms of their firebox size. Only the Princess will be able to be loaded full and run low. If you are like the other Alaska residence around here, your house is probably well insulated. Go with the Princess and enjoy the long burn times.
 
For what you are talking about, the Princess is going to be the most controllable. Last winter was my first with the King. Though my 1600 sq ft is no where near as well insulated as yours, our winter was very mild and I was never uncomfortable. Burning softwood, it will be a great choice. Prices are kinda high, but all the new stoves you listed are in the same ballpark. It's worth the extra, IMO.

Dry wood is important for any stove, but more so with the cat.
 
Based on what you have described, I'd also go with the Princess. The Alderlea T6 would not cook you out of the place, but if you don't need the cast iron jacket to moderate heat output and the trivet top doesn't interest, then why pay for it? A Summit would do the job for less money.
 
If you have read this forum you are probably convinced like I am that the Blaze King is a great stove. I have never owned one but there are plenty of satisfied owners here.

I'd split that Black Spruce to get to to dry faster, and I think you're gonna have to find some larger logs to give you long burns.
 
Why not just replace the damaged bricks and baffle? Are you getting an air leak from around the cleanout brick? I just think long burn times are going to be tough while burning spruce.
 
Why not just replace the damaged bricks and baffle? Are you getting an air leak from around the cleanout brick? I just think long burn times are going to be tough while burning spruce.
Blaze Kings seem to be a different animal. The T-stat and cat set up the blaze king uses produce even heat over a long time. Their engineering/design people just seem to have it "figured out". If I lived in Alaska, burning softwood or hardwood, I wouldn't own anything else. Too many users here with the same reports for it to be BS. The owner said that he/she wanted to replace for longer burn times.

Long shoulder seasons/Slow and low burning=Cat stove. Not too many do it better than Blaze King.
 
I think with your wood situation up in Alaska the BK is the way to go but 1-3 are good stoves, also as someone mentioned the Summit is a great stove.
 
Another vote here for the Princess. I have a 3.2 cf non-cat insert (a little larger than the Princess). I get great results with my oak, locust and maple, but from what I've read here on the forum with soft wood you're going to have much better results with a cat stove.
 
Def the Princess. The soft wood will love it.
 
The blaze king would be my choice, because of the low and slow burns you can get. That advantage does come with some challenges though. The cat does best with dry wood. You have already indicated that your wood is not quite there yet. It would be worth your time to go ahead and get that wood drying now and get ahead. Watch the cat, and clean as necessary, as your wood gets dryer, the less likely the cat is to plug up. It is worth the effort in my opinion. The control you will get with the thermostatic air control, and the low slow burn is something no other stove can offer.
 
Yeah, I think the BK is the choice. And I made the mistake of showing the missus the 3 different "trims" of the Princess, and she fell in love with the parlor model. Oh well. <shrug>

I am going to replace the brick and the baffle and put the "old" (1996 mfg) Century up on craigslist. I know prices vary from region to region, but what would a stove like that bring in your part of the world? With new brick and baffle and paint. I think that model is about 3.0 CF.
 
Another vote for the princess. I am not sure how they came up with that name though. Maybe it was the same logic as calling a tiny dog Brutus.
 
Another vote for the princess. I am not sure how they came up with that name though. Maybe it was the same logic as calling a tiny dog Brutus.

Calling a fat guy "slim", or a bald guy "curly"...
 
Compared to the king, it had to be a step down. Queen was already taken and sounds pretty limp wristed.
 
How about Duke or Earl?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.