Help on liner insulation

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

nyyfan

Member
Jan 25, 2012
46
NH
So I installed a new insert and liner last August for my house. I had been told that since it was an exterior chimney and that the clay liner was in good shape that I would not have to insulate the liner. I had no problems last burning season but have since decided after doing more research that I should insulate the liner. After speaking with a chimney sweep they said that since I have a flex liner that they would not be able to pull it out and just re-line that one. Also since I have a 8 x 13 flue, that inorder to get a new insulated liner down the chimney, that the clay tiles will have to be removed in order for it to fit. Has anyone else had this problem? Would the pour in mix be a better remedy? Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 
There is one school of thought that says the liner you have is only touching masonry in a couple of places, and is mostly surrounded by air. If that air column is capped off at top and bottom, then it can make a pretty good insulator itself, and thus other means of insulation are not necessary. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just saying it's a theory I've seen posted.
 
They are correct that you can not insulate a 6" liner in that small of a chimney, it will not fit, they would have to bust out the terracotta then run it down. IF you have a tall chimney you could possibly run a 5.5" insulated liner down it.

If you want to deal with the thermix type of pour in insulation it would be a solution that wouldn't involve pulling the liner out. Many members here have done it, just remember it is pretty much a permanent thing.
 
There is one school of thought that says the liner you have is only touching masonry in a couple of places, and is mostly surrounded by air. If that air column is capped off at top and bottom, then it can make a pretty good insulator itself, and thus other means of insulation are not necessary. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just saying it's a theory I've seen posted.

I have read about this as well. The top is sealed off pretty well and I was thinking about adding a blockoff plate and insulation at the bottom. But that is when I heard it would be important to insulate the liner to prevent a higher buildup of creosote, since more of the warm air is staying in the room as opposed to heating the liner.
 
The difference in liner heating due to blocking off room air with a blockoff plate is minimal. The liner is heated by the flue gasses, not the room air circulating up around the outside of the liner.

Rather than worry about potential for creosote, I'd install a block-off plate, run it for a season, and then inspect to see how it did.

I had considered Thermix for my situation as well, but hate the permanent nature of it. There's no going back, and when you have a 240 year old chimney you begin to think about what "permanent" really means, in the long run.
 
How about an insulation that you pour around the liner like thermix? http://www.amazon.com/DuraVent-0206...e=UTF8&qid=1345772874&sr=1-2&keywords=thermix Not saying that is the place to buy it, just the quickest place for me to find it.

Other folks have used loose vermiculite or perlite, but to the best of my knowledge, thermix is the only pour in insulation that is approved by many liner manufacturers (no voided warranty).

pen
 
I have read about this as well. The top is sealed off pretty well and I was thinking about adding a blockoff plate and insulation at the bottom. But that is when I heard it would be important to insulate the liner to prevent a higher buildup of creosote, since more of the warm air is staying in the room as opposed to heating the liner.

Insulate the block off plate with Roxul and stuff a few feet of it in the chimney around top of the liner before you put the top plate on. It might, kinda, sorta work for two chimneys for six or seven years I hear. ::-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: fox9988
Not sure why you couldn't re-use the liner that you have. I have a very similar setup (8x13 flue, 18 ft. exterior chimney) and all the installer did was custom ovalize the liner before insulating (with 1/2" insulation no less) and everything fit fine even with the sloppy mortar joints in the flue. Then again, this guy knew exactly what he was doing and had all the right tools for the job.

On the other hand, if your stove if operating fine, maybe there's not much benefit in doing this now? +1 on installing the block-off plate though...but more to keep the heat from being lost up the chimney than to warm the liner.
 
I'm not an expert, but from what I understand the main point of insulating the liner when it's inside a masonry chimney is to cut down on creosote build-up. Since you've had it installed for a year I would start with the empirical data of how well your system is functioning. If it seems good and your wood supply is stable I would suggest monitoring the buildup. Insulation is nice but is not a substitute for all the other things we need to do correctly to keep from burning down our homes. I can still clog an insulated chimney (wet wood, smoldering overnight) if I want. Sweeping the flue 2x year vs one may be all that is needed.

If you're a suspenders+belt kinda person (as am I) you're not going to let it go, but I would suggest as others have done already that a block off plate top+bottom possibly paired with pour-in insulation may be a substantial enough upgrade and much more cost effective. Unless you've got a draft/excessive creasote problem my non-expert opinion is that pulling the liner and busting out the clay, then insulating + re installing is not going to gain you a margin of safety correlating with the effort involved.

But I'm not an expert. Just a homeowner who spends a lot of time over-thinking how to run an extremely simple appliance in my living room. Yes, it could be dangerous but so could that 3yr old jar of mayo in the back of the fridge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grinnell
Thanks for all of the input. I am still weighing my options, but really appreciate all of the help from the members here.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong here but I thought insulating the liner was necessary for a chimney to meet code if there was any doubt the existing chimney is not built to code. I would think that severly offset tiles would indicate a chimney no longer meeting code. Again, please correct me if I'm wrong. I have Thermix poured in mine to meet code becuase my chinmey is about 90 years old and I had no clue whether it was bulit to code and wanted the piece of mind.
 
I have an exterior chimney and i have not had a problem one with creosote or perfomance with an uninsulated liner. I burn dry wood and check my chimney for smoke all the time.. No smoke equals no creosote,,, if you have smoke coming out of the chimney you run the risk of creosote build up,,, also burn hot through out the day for extended periods of time to keep chimney stacks hot. i did not need to sweep my chimney this year because I kept an eye on it. I have a non cat stove and if I see smoke I simply open the air controll on the stove until the smoke out the chimney is gone. I do use creosote powder from Menards during the heating season.
 
I have a slightly taller chimney I put a 5.5" insulated liner down. I also stuffed insulation around the top of the same size flue that you have. It is connected to a big 30 and doesn't give me any problems.


Matt
 
Correct me if I'm wrong here but I thought insulating the liner was necessary for a chimney to meet code if there was any doubt the existing chimney is not built to code. I would think that severly offset tiles would indicate a chimney no longer meeting code. Again, please correct me if I'm wrong. I have Thermix poured in mine to meet code becuase my chinmey is about 90 years old and I had no clue whether it was bulit to code and wanted the piece of mind.
There are different classifications. I think an insulated SS gives you a class A, which is nice but may not really be necessary inside a traditional masonry chimney. If a chimney can burn without a liner and be safe, a liner inside a chimney is doubly so. Besides, the point of the liner is not to keep the house from burning down but to correctly size the draft to the appliance.
 
Actually, the point of an insulated liner IS to prevent a fire by insulating the liner from any contact point in a defective or substandard chimney. The other point is to keep flue gases hotter over the length of the chimney. This can improve draft and reduce creosote accumulation.

I think code is that if the masonry chimney does not have a 1" air gap separating contact with wood then an insulated liner is required.
 
I think code is that if the masonry chimney does not have a 1" air gap separating contact with wood then an insulated liner is required.

Right idea, but I think it's actually a 2" air gap requirement. Just went thru this myself, and that's the number that was quoted to me.
 
Good point. You are correct for interior chimneys which require 2". nyyfan has an exterior chimney which requires 1".

R1001.15 Chimney clearances. Any portion of a masonry chimney located in the interior of the building or within the exterior wall of the building shall have a minimumair space clearance to combustibles of 2 inches (51 mm). Chimneys located entirely outside the exterior walls of the building, including chimneys that pass through the soffit or cornice, shall have a minimum air space clearance of 1 inch (25.4 mm). The air space shall not be filled, except to provide fire blocking in accordance with Section R1001.16.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashful
what brand of flex? insulation is required on several brands of flex. also had one maker tell me they wont honor the lifetime warrantee unless it was insulated
 
Status
Not open for further replies.