The scourge of the Insurance Industry

He needs to reply with his wallet & go ins. shopping.

Maybe the outdoor "gasser" is just a recast OWB with a new name. Insurance companies are not in the business of wood burning; they are in the business of eliminating risk so they never have to pay anything, thus "insuring" their profits.

I don't find that response to be in any way unreasonable. Requiring a 50' distance between an OWB and a structure or tree line seems like a fine idea. Around here code requires much further than that.

I'd love to see the part of the email that prompted this response from the insurance agent. I'm betting the potential insured was being a prick.

And last....an acre of land isn't much room for an OWB based on what I've seen in terms of wood requirements and smoke output. I wouldn't want one at my neighbors house with less than an acre between us, that's for sure.

we had a neighbor's place burned down by the OWB.. it probably was more than 50' from the building, but 50 mph winds from the west blew over the stack and sparks into the wood pile and lumber next to the building went up, building followed.

I talked them into replacing with a GARN, and they've been happy with it for 3 years now.

getting a snapshot into a conversation is just that. the before and after would be useful.

Karl

There isnt much that can be done to alter what an insurance company will or will not do / cover. For the most part its their choice in the matter there are state regulations and such but if they have had problems in the past with similar units or with a mfg and make the decision to no longer take such risks it is up to them to decide that. The manufacturer should have minimum safe distances posted for the equipment as to how far from combustibles the boiler has to be. Then of course the exhaust has to follow regulation and mfg guidelines. I would combine that information and go insurance shopping and bring it up on initial consult with the other insurance agencys. I would not buy or install the unit until you have a insurance agency that supports you.

Tdiguy said:

There isnt much that can be done to alter what an insurance company will or will not do / cover. For the most part its their choice in the matter there are state regulations and such but if they have had problems in the past with similar units or with a mfg and make the decision to no longer take such risks it is up to them to decide that. The manufacturer should have minimum safe distances posted for the equipment as to how far from combustibles the boiler has to be. Then of course the exhaust has to follow regulation and mfg guidelines. I would combine that information and go insurance shopping and bring it up on initial consult with the other insurance agencys. I would not buy or install the unit until you have a insurance agency that supports you.

Click to expand...

I agree. Insurance companies are private businesses, and as such can decide who they will do business with.
That is the benefit of free enterprise, you get to chart our own destiny. There are some insurance companies up here that add a 100% surcharge if you burn any wood. There are a couple that only add surcharges for wood stoves, as that is what causes them the most proplems with flue fires up here.

I pay a $25 surcharge for burning with a boiler. If my use goes over 6 cords/yr it is a 100% surcharge.
That is why I bought a gasifier, and insulated the guts out of the house. It will keep me at about 5 cords per season.

Take that Mr Insurance Man!

willyswagon said:

I agree. Insurance companies are private businesses, and as such can decide who they will do business with.
That is the benefit of free enterprise, you get to chart our own destiny. There are some insurance companies up here that add a 100% surcharge if you burn any wood. There are a couple that only add surcharges for wood stoves, as that is what causes them the most proplems with flue fires up here.

I pay a $25 surcharge for burning with a boiler. If my use goes over 6 cords/yr it is a 100% surcharge.
That is why I bought a gasifier, and insulated the guts out of the house. It will keep me at about 5 cords per season.

Take that Mr Insurance Man!

Click to expand...

There needs to be a double "like" button!

TS

willyswagon said:

I agree. Insurance companies are private businesses, and as such can decide who they will do business with.
That is the benefit of free enterprise, you get to chart our own destiny. There are some insurance companies up here that add a 100% surcharge if you burn any wood. There are a couple that only add surcharges for wood stoves, as that is what causes them the most proplems with flue fires up here.

I pay a $25 surcharge for burning with a boiler. If my use goes over 6 cords/yr it is a 100% surcharge.
That is why I bought a gasifier, and insulated the guts out of the house. It will keep me at about 5 cords per season.

Take that Mr Insurance Man!

Click to expand...

the other benefit of free enterprise is that you (the customer) get to choose who you do business with. make sure they know why you dropped them if you change insurance providers.

It's sad to see things like that but the truth of the matter is that most problems like this could have been avoided if people would have adopted a "best practices" attitude and manufacturers would have stepped up to the plate with good technology.

As it stands right now the industry has given itself a huge black eye that will take a very long time to go away.

willyswagon said:

I agree. Insurance companies are private businesses, and as such can decide who they will do business with.
That is the benefit of free enterprise, you get to chart our own destiny. There are some insurance companies up here that add a 100% surcharge if you burn any wood. There are a couple that only add surcharges for wood stoves, as that is what causes them the most proplems with flue fires up here.

I pay a $25 surcharge for burning with a boiler. If my use goes over 6 cords/yr it is a 100% surcharge.
That is why I bought a gasifier, and insulated the guts out of the house. It will keep me at about 5 cords per season.

Take that Mr Insurance Man!

Click to expand...

That's interesting.........Who checks to see how many cords of wood you go through and how is it measured?

That's interesting.........Who checks to see how many cords of wood you go through and how is it measured?

Face cord or 128 cu. ' cord, wet or dry cord?

heaterman said:

That's interesting.........Who checks to see how many cords of wood you go through and how is it measured?

Click to expand...

When I told them I had changed to solid fuel.
They sent out a form to fill in. Which included questions like how much wood do you expect to burn per season? How many litres of fuel oil do you typically burn before making the switch?
Are you willing to prove your oil consumption? How often will you clean the chimney?......On and On!

When he( their inspector) was doing the original inspection, he measured off the pile and came up with 11.8 cords. He asked why so much on site if I was only going to burn 5 - 6 cords/ yr? I told him that I was getting ahead of it so the boiler would be running at his best, as suggested by users on a forum I use.

He asked what site? As soon as I mentioned Hearth.com he said that would be all the questions he would be asking as the people that follow "THAT FORUM" are the type of wood burners every company wants.

I laughed and said what do you mean?
He said "Those guys would find a way to squeeze BTU's out of a popcorn fart in the desert!"

It is based on full cords 128Cu Ft

Of course it also opened the door for a full inspection while he was here.

PS No inspection = No coverage