My pseudo holz Hausen

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

AlMo

New Member
Jan 4, 2012
9
Western NY
Hi everyone.

I am on the fence as to the drying times claimed for this stacking method, but I can attest that this is by far the fastest way to stack 5 face cords.

My only regret is not taking pictures when I started . I would say in total , it took about 4 hours .

I am thinking of leaving this uncovered .
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    109 KB · Views: 282
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    165.9 KB · Views: 291
Nice. I thought about doing an oval.
 
The one I built I left uncovered for the first summer. I threw a tarp over it then looped string through and hung bricks w/ holes in them through the string. Left it on until I needed to burn the wood the following winter.

pen
 
@pen - I was thinking about tarping this too - the thought of the November rains -> December snow hitting this pile doesn't appeal to me. I'm still on the fence though. From your experience, did you find any benefit from any additional drying times using this method?


@CTFIRE - Ironically, I went oval vs Circle only because I had a smaller version I had started to test the waters. It was my intention to make it a circle, but then I realized that it would be faster to just make it oval. I have to admit, I can see how the longer walls will likely cave in once I start getting into the center, but given that saved all the time (and ache on my back !) it feel its worth it. Depending on my success this winter , I may end up doing this oval format again
 
  • Like
Reactions: CTFIRE
did you find any benefit from any additional drying times using this method?

Nope. But it looked dang pretty!
 
4hrs for 5 face cords is not a time saver whatsoever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Backwoods Savage
;-)
 
Welcome to the forum ALMo.

If you like the looks of them it is okay and we say go ahead with it. But it has been proven many times that it does not dry wood as fast and some have found it took more time which is what I would tend to believe just looking at the thing and realizing that air circulation is the key to drying wood and doing it the fastest.

In addition, some claim it not only is faster to stack but takes up less room. Simple math will say differently about the space and for sure it has to take more time to stack. For example, look at the picture below:

Denny-April 2009i.JPG

This is how we stack. We split right where we want the wood stacked. When done, we lay down some saplings we cut in the woods. Two 10' saplings laid down to stack the wood on works great. Yes, most of our wood is stacked in 10' lengths. Bu the point is, look where the splits are and look where we are stacking. It is a simple latter of reach on one side to get the wood, turn and lay it down. No walking at all. Very little movement. Although I probably can no longer do it, I know I used to stack a cord per hour. No, that was not a face cord, but a full cord. Age has taken it's normal toll so now I have no idea how long it takes but for sure I could match that 4 hour for less than 2 cord.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlMo
I combined two of them to look like this.


Started out like this
(admin note - for some reason, these didn't show in the post - I had to re-upload).
holz2.jpg holz1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How did that method get popular? You really have to watch a video to do it;lol
 
Welcome to the forum ALMo.

If you like the looks of them it is okay and we say go ahead with it. But it has been proven many times that it does not dry wood as fast and some have found it took more time which is what I would tend to believe just looking at the thing and realizing that air circulation is the key to drying wood and doing it the fastest.

In addition, some claim it not only is faster to stack but takes up less room. Simple math will say differently about the space and for sure it has to take more time to stack. For example, look at the picture below:

View attachment 112735

This is how we stack. We split right where we want the wood stacked. When done, we lay down some saplings we cut in the woods. Two 10' saplings laid down to stack the wood on works great. Yes, most of our wood is stacked in 10' lengths. Bu the point is, look where the splits are and look where we are stacking. It is a simple latter of reach on one side to get the wood, turn and lay it down. No walking at all. Very little movement. Although I probably can no longer do it, I know I used to stack a cord per hour. No, that was not a face cord, but a full cord. Age has taken it's normal toll so now I have no idea how long it takes but for sure I could match that 4 hour for less than 2 cord.


Wow, that is a lot of wood !

Ok...I am starting to see that perhaps the Holzhausen method of stacking may not be the fastest after all, in light of this new information. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Backwoods Savage
Some advantages I've found with the HH is I can hide the ugly splits in the center without fear of jeopardizing stack collapse. Also , doesn't matter which way the wind blows for drying purposes. PS I never cover "top" of my HH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CTFIRE
Status
Not open for further replies.