Advice needed re: heating system plans

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

meathead

Feeling the Heat
Nov 13, 2008
358
Central Maine
I will be installing a new heating system this summer and am looking for some input. I am leaning toward a wood/oil combination furnace, but have some concerns:

1. Some seem to feel multi-fuel units sacrifice efficiency. Better to get a new oil furnace and a separate wood add-on?

2. Will I get the BTUs I need? ~3500 square feet of 1860s farm house in central Maine...I need some juice. Models like Charmaster and Yukon Polar claim they can get it done, but I don't want to find out the hard way they don't quite do it.

Any advice is welcome. If there is a bigger badder furnace out there that I haven't stumbled across, please let me know.
 
I personally would get a separate oil/propane boiler. They are everywhere and cheap on Uncle Henrys and craigslist. You only plan on using it occasionally so no sense spending big bucks on it. Cheap piece of mine if you have the space and flues.

Now you have a lot more options for your wood or pellet boiler than being tied to a combination unit.
 
And by furnace you mean furnace... not boiler, right? A lot more boiler options than furnace it seems.
 
If your looking at a furnace the biggest and baddest are the KUUMA and the caddy. The Kuuma as what I have is the best, and American made with American steel.
 
Thanks for the replies. I am looking for an indoor furnace. It does look like getting separate units ould open up more wood furnace options, so I'm starting to look that route. I had hoped to find some larger wood-only furnaces out there, but am still finding that most stop at around 100K BTU/3500 sq ft heating capacity. Any higher output models you know of?

I have looked at the Kuuma and the Caddy and they both look pretty nice. The Kuuma website says the larger model produces 30K-40K BTU and would take the place of a 100K BTU oil burner- so I don't think it will have the output I need. The Caddy has a 77% approval rating from recent customers who have registered their product - not exactly shouting its praises - plus a smaller oil burner option than charmaster and lower overall BTU ratings than both charmaster and yukon.

On another note - can anyone with a charmaster tell me about their shipping? This is going to be a big investment for me, and their "if it breaks during shipping that's your problem" policy has me wanting to give my money to someone else. Do they at least crate it well so damage is unlikely?
 
The Napoleon HMF 200 appears to be one of the largest wood furnaces with clean burning capabilities. With a 30" log capacity and a 5 cuft firebox, it's a beast. The Max Caddy from PSG would come in close as far as size is concerned. I think the Kuuma is a great furnace, I just don't know if it would be enough for a house that size and age. Nothing personal against Charmaster, their designs haven't changed in years. The furnaces by PSG, Kuuma and Napoleon contain proper preheated secondary air channels, insulated fireboxes and heat exchangers for maximum efficiency. A furnace like the Max Caddy or HMF 200 would be a closer match for your home. The Caddy's are a well built furnace, I think the negative ratings come from those who buy something that's not sized correctly for their home. That's the main complaints I've read about. When sized correctly they are a breeze.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.