Modern/Contemporary Stoves +/-'s

I guess it would depend on how you are planning on using the stove. I dont think theat most of the contemporary stoves are designed to be primary heat sources, more so they are for occasional fires in the evenings.

When I started looking at new stoves, I too was surprised by how small the fireboxes were for medium size miodels I was looking at. Then again, contemporary stoves are more efficient by up to 1/3 which means you can have a smaller firebox. I have a Woodstock stove which replaced an old Jotul that I had. I was sad to see the Jotul go and a bit apprehensive that I might not like the new stove. WRONG!! The Woodstock is lightyears better than the old Jotul. It is my primary heat source, easy to use, beautiful to look at, miserly on wood use and extremely clean burning. New stoves in my opinion rate ++++++++++++, if there was any - at all it can be somewhat pricey depending on what you get. They are more functional, more efficent, transfer heat better and more evenly, go for it without reservations!

TrevorZS said:

Ones I know of are:
Rais, Scan/Jotul, Wittus (Wolf), Morso (the modern soapstone models), Max Blank, Bari (by HearthStone)... but would like to also hear about others as well.

Any anyone offer any experience on – use*, reliability, actual heat functionality (vs being more decorative), maintenance, etc?

*e.g. Seems like they all have pretty small firebox sizes (kind of a concern, not just low BTUs, but also, burn time, and only being able to fit tiny logs) … but would appreciate anyone’s experience to see how this worked out for them.

Click to expand...

Trevor for ones available in the US you could add Nestor Martin, (imported by the same group importing Max Blank), the Pacific Energy Fusion, and one I just found today Zephyr Stoves, which isn't quite modern looking but not bad either.

There are tons of European makers like Rika, (Austrian), Hwam, (Danish), Piazzetta , (Italian), Thermorossi, (also Italian), Wanders, (Dutch), Barbas, (also Dutch), Hergom - Bosca and Hase lines, (Spanish), Contura - (NIBE Group), (Swedish), Handol - (NIBE Group), (also Swedish), Harvia, (Finnish), and my favorite the Topolino made by Tonwerk-Larsen, (Swiss). I have a few more links but you get the idea.

I don't have any personal experience with any of these but I would first note that Europeans live in much smaller houses than most Americans and Canadians and need less heat to begin with, and there is also probably less space for wood storage as well. If you check out the sites you will see the numbers put forth by the European stove makers would seem to be as efficient as most North American counterparts. In general Europeans are about form as well as function so I don't think that these are meant to be for decoration more than heat. Style and substance go together, like Pininfarina coachwork in a Ferrari.

The main drawback for us is that none of these stoves is imported to the US as far as I know and given the sorry state of the greenback vs. the euro, these would set one back serious money for ultimately less heat output in most cases due to the disparity between European and North American dwellings. That said, when I was looking at these my wife was over my shoulder and asked why we don't have a wood stove that looks like 'one of those'. She said she would help more with the stove if we could get one. I can dream.

It's a bit of a chicken / egg situation - you aren't going to sell contemporary stoves if there is no demand for them, and you can't generate the demand if nobody is selling them... Personally, I want a stove that looks like a stove, not a reject from Star Drek or a video game, so I want to stick with something more "classic looking" like most of the US stoves, or even a Jotul. (It's a STOVE Captain, not a warp drive... :lol: )

As to the testing, I think it's partly a commentary on the expense of getting past the EPA / UL testing procedures, and also I've heard that the Euro stoves are designed to a different set of standards than the US - The EPA standards have focused almost exclusively on gpH, whereas the Euro stoves are more concerned w/ overall efficiency, so it may be a case of the Euro stove burning clean overall, but not meeting the EPA standards. (I remember a while back when we had the lady from the Mediteranean asking for advice, it appeared that her stove didn't have any sort of secondary burn technology in it at all...) If that's the case, the stove would need a redesign to meet US standards, and that probably wouldn't be worth it.

Gooserider

There's a store by me that has contemporary stoves, there expensive, and there is very little demand for them.

Then again, contemporary stoves are more efficient by up to 1/3 which means you can have a smaller firebox. Can someone explain this quote, I don't get it?

Don;t forget to check out these: http://www.vogelzang.com/

Smokey said:

There's a store by me that has contemporary stoves, there expensive, and there is very little demand for them.

Then again, contemporary stoves are more efficient by up to 1/3 which means you can have a smaller firebox. Can someone explain this quote, I don't get it?

Click to expand...

Compared to a smoke dragon

TrevorZS said:

Hello all, new here and new to looking at stoves.
Ones I know of are:
Rais, Scan/Jotul, Wittus (Wolf), Morso (the modern soapstone models), Max Blank, Bari (by HearthStone)... but would like to also hear about others as well.

Any anyone offer any experience on – use*, reliability, actual heat functionality (vs being more decorative), maintenance, etc?

Click to expand...

Not as much wood in Europe, and smaller boxes are more efficient in general for smaller flats (average house size is smaller too).

That said, companies like Scan and Morso and others make some decent fireboxes in their larger models. That list, plus the few other suggestions, seems like PLENTY of choices.

I'm repeating myself here, but the Avalon of 2007 looks exactly like the Avalon of 1984. Same with a lot of other manufacturers. Many years ago, Lopi was on the leading edge of new stove design....but they went broke overspending on R&D;. You cannot force a market, and you must provide what people want to buy.

A lot of the modern designs have went to fireplaces......since a wealthier client can be had in some areas. Example - Albers in Central NJ have always sold top-of-the-line Fireplaces in all styles....

But I can tell you with confidence that our stove warehouse had piles of Avalons, VC and Jotul in it....and that is what people wanted to buy. We would often bring in a modern look (Piezetta, etc)....and it would just sit there.

Just like Ford Pickup Trucks and Chevy Surburbans.......we have a certain taste (or lack of in some views), and that dictates what the customers will see and buy.....

Another factor in stove choice is that a modern contempory designed stove only goes with a contempory home- more the city, less the heartland/country. Space and layout is a concern in the overall design as well as "the look", and as such - a wood/ gas stove is usualy part (or not) of the original design- not an add on.
Many of us country folk either have always had a stove, replacing a stove, or have got tired of the oil/gas companies and are returning to roots and retrofitting a stove into a home. Not likely that we would install a stove that looks like, and is in fact a pitcureframe that has to be built into a wall or an art object. There are many "charms" in "the look" of a modern stove- but when money meets the dealers counter, I will take - Tried and True with "looks" over an unknown. Maybe, just maybe that is why you can find lots of sites and info on these exotic stoves- but very few in the stores or in use.