Rocket stove mass heater; mass storage

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

barnartist

Minister of Fire
I wasn't sure where this post should go, so please feel free to move it moderator!

If your familiar with the rocket stove and how its mass storage works using the chimney as essentially a heat transfer to a cob surface, why can't I take the output (chimney) of my wood gassifier and do the same with it? I get a very clean burn much like what a rocket stove does. Maybe it would change the draft?

I built a prototype rocket stove, but without the storage. I simply ran a series of 6" pipe around my garage, and it worked extremely well, the draft was terrific!

So why not do this storage setup with my gasser and get every last once of heat I can claim?
 
Hmmm...combo rocket stove/gasser... Gonna guess that the gasser folks have the most ideas to share with you. Gonna move it to the boiler room with a couple of days worth of redirect. That way is kinda hits both forums.
 
Don't think it will work because the flue gasses have already passed through the heat exchanger so the flue gas temp. leaving the gasser is generally below 400 degrees. Extract any more heat from it and you would likely run into condensation problems imo.
 
If you look at the numbers that the rocket stove people brag about (IE 100F or lower exhaust temps from the mass) you ARE condensing, no question. I think the original method of using cobb mitigates this in that when the stovepipe rots out, the condensate is absorbed by the cob and neutralized there depending on the soil/ cob composition. what I've never seen from anyone on the rocket stove forums is how many pounds of wood you can run thru the stove per hour or day. I think they're really oversold by their proponents.

they can be a solution for some applications (chicken coop?) but I'm skeptical.

karl
 
My only experience with gasification is with my EKO 25 which upon close examination has the J tube that the people building the rocket stoves declare as an essential element , the difference being that the EKO uses a fan to enhance the combustion as opposed to a natural draft. As far as condensation is concerned I believe that an insulated chimney and or keeping it inside the envelope as long as possible is key. In his book , Ianto Evans suggest the exhaust exit the side of the building angled slightly down before returning vertical for only a few feet with an 180* bend at top also has a creosote trap were it exits the building. It seems to me if there is any condensation issues it would be in the rocket stove mass and not with the boiler itself. I'm looking forward to barnartist 's further experiments since I too have thought about the prospects of scavenging more energy out an all ready pretty efficient system.
 
I did see significant condensation when using my rocket stove. The end of my chimney run went up at a 45 angle. then horizontal out the exterior wall, then 90 vertical. All the condensation seemed to collect there.

What if I routed a line off my EKO using a damper to direct chimney flow to a certain length of pipe. When the EKO is at a good performance period, rout that clean air through the new pipe and collect what ever heat is left into a cob or some type of heat sink/storage? I am just wondering how it would effect the draft of the eko...

It would be a lot of work for such an experiment, but the payoff could be grand. Any further thought out there?
 
If I'm understanding you correctly you are experiencing condensation upon exiting the building as it hits the cold air, I would believe that to be the norm with the lower exhaust temps. that's why Ianto Evans slants it slightly down at that point with a small hole in the bottom of the 90* angle going vertical. I got to believe that there is a certain amount of condensation in any type of mass heater including masonry heaters that try to extract the max. amount of heat from the exhaust.

I find this an interesting case of getting more heat out of an ordinary wood stove http://www.geopathfinder.com/Masonry-Stove.html
 
Thanks for the link Jeff S!
I never thought about having the chimney air go back down like that, I would have thought it would not want to circulate well, but then I suppose once vertical again it helps pull that air.
 
I believe in this scenario it allows you to establish a good fire and warm the chimney before engaging in "heat the mass mode" which should help the chimney to draw.
 
I'm not following your thought process here, if you're looking for thermal mass and you have a boiler why not store the heat it in water? Cob comes in a poor second when you compare it's heat retention properties to water. I think rocket stoves are a great idea if someone's starting from scratch and they have no money to do anything better but if you've invested in a gasifier you've already moved to a higher plane. To rob any more heat from the flue gas is going to have a negative effect on your boiler operation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.