Oak Firewood Ready for Next Year

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

chris2879

Member
Nov 8, 2010
117
Western MA
I am not sure what to do. I called a guy today that will deliver log length oak for 100/cord this week. The only problem is, i don't have enough room to keep more than a years worth of wood. So up to this point, i mainly burn maple, which has been perfectly fine splitting in the spring and burning the following winter.

If i try to do that with oak, will i be asking for trouble? I know the rule is oak takes 2 years, and most everything else you are fine with 1 year of seasoning time. What is everyone's thoughts?
 
I have burned 1 year old oak but it didn't work out to well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fred Wright
Here, it's 2 yrs for dead Oak, 3 for live-cut. And that's if I split medium-small. You only have about half a year, and probably live wood...no way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Wallace
try and fit it in some where it's worth it for the price.i have same problem as you lack of space but you'll figure something out driveway maybe
 
Get it and split it and get the maple too. Split twice as much. Bite the bullet.
Best heating wood there is.
But dont burn it before its ready. Burn the maple.
 
My Oslo basically laughed at me when I tried to burn 18 month split/stacked Oak. It simply would not keep a flame. If you don't have the room, I say skip the Oak and stick with what has worked.
 
That's the gotcha with oak. Like the folks said, it won't be seasoned well enough to burn after a year stacked.

When ya think about it, a cord of stacked wood doesn't take up much room. Maybe you could make two or more smaller stacks, spread around?
 
you would be surprised how much wood you can fit with creative stacking in a yard with limited space, I say go for it, make your stacks nice and neat and it will be part of the yard décor.. heeps of wood look sloppy, a nice stack looks like your ready for anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikey517
A 40" x 48" pallet stacked 5' high will hold half a cord. Surely you can find an extra 80" x 48" space. Then wrap it in pallet shrink wrap to accelerate the drying.
 
A 40" x 48" pallet stacked 5' high will hold half a cord. Surely you can find an extra 80" x 48" space. Then wrap it in pallet shrink wrap to accelerate the drying.

I don't know of anyone that would deliver just 1 cord of logs. It's most likely an entire log truck, load which equates to around 8 cord.
 
A 40" x 48" pallet stacked 5' high will hold half a cord. Surely you can find an extra 80" x 48" space. Then wrap it in pallet shrink wrap to accelerate the drying.

Shrink wrap? Wouldn't this cause too much close condensation and sweat and actually slow the drying process?
 
Shrink wrap? Wouldn't this cause too much close condensation and sweat and actually slow the drying process?
I haven't tried it myself, but from what I've been reading in other threads, the shrink wrap raises the temp during the day, then the moisture condenses on the plastic and runs out the bottom at night. The pallet should probably even be covered with plastic with weep holes poked in it. Hillbilly solar kiln.
 
Shrink wrap? Wouldn't this cause too much close condensation and sweat and actually slow the drying process?
if you leave it open at the top you'll have a green house with a chimney. Iv seen some up here with a almost pyramidal roof on them made of cordwood splits, then wrapped, with just a four inch chimney hole at the top. If I had something with forks on it I would be sorely tempted to give it a whirl.
 
I have two big cords of red oak which will be 4 years split and stacked next year. We'll see how it does. I tried some this year and wasn't impressed with the burn quality.
 
Personally I don't think oak is worth the trouble. But I know many who disagree, and they probably know a lot more than I do.
 
Personally I don't think oak is worth the trouble. But I know many who disagree, and they probably know a lot more than I do.

If you don't have the space and time to let it dry this may be true but if you do then oak is great!
 
  • Like
Reactions: WoodpileOCD
I just don't know how to burn anything but oak. Having paid a mortgage on five and a half acres that consists of 4.5 acres of oak trees. Burned off of it for 30 years and ya can't tell a tree is missing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.