Building a hearth...does this seem reasonable?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

fishboat

Member
Dec 2, 2006
77
Wisconsin
The burner has been installed & it's time to start the finish work.

The stove is a zero-clearance insert-type Bis Tradition CE. The top, bottom, both sides, & back of the unit are not an issue. The only non-combustible finishing I need to do is the hearth and facing around the unit. This will be done with Durock. The pic attached is a rough mockup and what I'll be building. The yellowish? area on top is the ceiling. Basic dimensions are 6 feet wide, about 11.5 feet on the left & 14.5 feet on the right. Vertical surfaces will be dry-stacked slate, horizontal of the hearth will be slate tile.

mockup1.jpg



The hearth will be 6 feet wide & about 10 inches high. The hearth assembly I'm considering is below. It'll run around 220 pounds. It'll give me an R value of 1.56 (all the Durock, not counting the slate tile). The Durock layers will be screwed together with 1.25 inch Durock screws & Flexbond thinset. The stove manual only states the hearth must be a non-combustible surface....no R or K values given. The stove puts out a max of 55K Btu with a contiuous output in the 30-35K Btu range. What do you think...is this a sound approach?

Stove front
slate tile (0.375 inch)
0.5 inch Durock
0.5 inch Durock
0.5 inch Durock
0.5 inch Durock
0.5 inch Durock
24 ga galvanized flashing under stove & fully covering hearth area
0.5 inch Durock
6.75 inches dimensional lumber 2-by
subfloor
 
thoughts anyone?

I'll be making the rounds and picking up all the various materials in a few hours.

thanks,
 
Sounds like it is very stealthy. Good luck with the project.
 
Very sound, but if there is no R value you dont need that may layers of Duroc. If its just for height go to the next size 2X
 
Hearth sounds good, since you only have to have a Non-Combustible surface, you could go to a thicker 2X on the supports, a layer of 3/4" plywood, a layer of Durock and then tile over, as that would meet the requirements. However what you are doing is certainly good and will be good "future-proofing" if you ever go to a different unit.

I don't know about the walls, as I'm not certain what is reqired to hold up your dry-stack slate, but it sounds neat.

One minor concern - I saw a mantle in your mockup, will that be wood? If so, will it be high enough to meet any clearance requirements on your insert?

Otherwise it looks great.

Gooserider
 
Thanks to all for your suggestions.

One of the driving forces to have the excessive number of durock layers is that I want to have a roof-flashing ember strip installed...as well as using the flashing over the entire hearth to dissipate heat. If I install the flashing at the bottom of the stove (lift the stove & insert the flashing between the stove bottom & the 2 x 8's it's sitting on) then I have 3.5 inches of filler-space to build up to the hearth surface itself. I suppose another option would be to use larger 2x material as you suggest and make a Z ember strip to insert under the stove, go up a couple inches, and then insert between a couple layers of Durcock. Naturally I don't have a sheet metal break though I could rig something up...maybe start with a piece of heating duct and cut it up. Using larger 2x would certainly be easier than cutting & wrestling durock.

The layers were also building up the R value as a "just in case"..I find it surprising the manual says only "non-combustible" without any reference to insulating from, or dissipating heat.

The mantle will be wood & probably won't look like the pic here, but it will be at the regulation height above the stove front.

This is what it looks like so far:


stove1.JPG


frontview.jpg
 
Looks good, and "overkill never hurts" but just thought I would mention the alternatives.

Gooserider
 
Status
Not open for further replies.