Blow Torch Secondaries

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

JA600L

Minister of Fire
Nov 30, 2013
1,288
Lancaster Pennsylvania
The secondaries on my ideal steel (during a high burn) are much more intense then my Quadra Fire . The flames shoot straight down. This stove is different because it does not have tubes. It has a manifold with holes in it. Any other stoves do this?
It literally cuts holes in the wood below it.
 

Attachments

  • 20160119_195127.jpg
    20160119_195127.jpg
    67.2 KB · Views: 267
  • Like
Reactions: freeburn and fespo
For curiousity sake, have you ever tried burning the IS without the CAT in it and see what kind of burns you get? I wonder how much the secondary burn does and if your cat went out and you needed to burn or simply wanted more heat without the cat in it. That would also speak to the efficiency vs a tube stove. I'm not sure if it says anything against that in the manual though?!
 
For curiousity sake, have you ever tried burning the IS without the CAT in it and see what kind of burns you get?

I've been doing that regularly as I move from reloading to engaging the CAT and there is some secondary activity.
I have also done some longer burns w/o CAT and no effects to it per inspection/cleaning (wasn't really dirty anyways).
 
  • Like
Reactions: freeburn
PE stoves have the secondary feed holes into the baffle. When I first saw the IS baffle that is what it reminded me of.
 
My stove has 3 tubes with the holes pointed forward and slightly downward. After a reload they all look like gas jets for a few hours and then it turns to slow rolling blue flame for another few hours.
 
i have an el cheapo stove with a baffle in it similar to yours, no cat though of course, and get secondaries like that as well, never gets old watching it.
 
For curiousity sake, have you ever tried burning the IS without the CAT in it and see what kind of burns you get? I wonder how much the secondary burn does and if your cat went out and you needed to burn or simply wanted more heat without the cat in it. That would also speak to the efficiency vs a tube stove. I'm not sure if it says anything against that in the manual though?!

I've thought about that myself. Maybe I'll shoot them an e-mail and ask.
 
Yea, in about 20 minutes mine will be shooting secondary flames into the wood. It's done it since the first fire this fall.
Fire drilled holes like this?

20160120_000155.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.