carbon monoxide detector question

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

basswidow

Minister of Fire
Oct 17, 2008
1,316
Milton GA
I have a Kidde Nighthawk digital read detector at the top of my stairs (center hall colonial) on the sleeping level. My two primary furnaces are propane so they recommend a low plug in level for propane dectection. However - we use the wood stove.

Last night - it gave off a single beep and a reading of 97ppm. This concerned me. I moved the unit to other locations within the house and got a 0 reading. We opened the windows and vented the house (checked on the kids first). No one had any symptoms. I plugged it back in and we went back to bed. Within 30 minutes - I got the same reading again.

This unit may be more than 5 years old - I am going to go to Home depot and buy 2 new ones today.

It's a plug in with a battery back up. If it was a battery issue - it would display LB (low battery). If it was a malfunction - it would display err. For gas leaks - it displays GAS. I don't know what to think. I belive it was giving an accurate reading. When it went off - we were not using the propane heat.

My woodstove door gasket is alittle worn - I am going to see about replacing that. My woodstove has an outdoor air intake and should be a sealed operation. Is it possible that I have a leak somewhere? It was very windy last night. When I checked on the stove - it was down to coals and not doing much.

I love my stove - but I am not going to run it and worry.

Anyone advise? Anyone else get readings like this? I read the instructions and about the symptoms. No one is experiencing symptoms. Perhaps it's just time to replace it - although it seems to work when moved. I don't know?
 
Well, I tried to delete my post, because we figured the problem out.

The unit was plugged in upside down - therefore --> a reading of 97 turned over is LB low battery. Relieved and yet mildly amused. I feel so stupid. Atleast I acted !!! In the wee hours of the morning - my cognitive abilities were lacking.
Too funny.

Burning wood - how many of you have carbon monoxide detectors? I have heard horror stories of whole families dying. It's made me alittle paranoid.
 
I'm glad you didn't delete the post. I laughed out loud just now. I can absolutely see myself doing the same thing. Too funny. LB....HA......
 
We bought a plug in model when we moved last year and were having furnace problems.The closest outlet just happened to be in our sons room but that also happens to be the farthest away from the woodstove. Now the furnace doesn't need to run (unless it ever gets real cold)so we will be adding another co detector in the front of the house where the stove is located.
 
I'd say leave the post - it's a good lesson! Sort of like the blond at the auto parts store insisting she needed a new "710" cap for her car...

710-cap.jpg
 
Good thread about CO. There was a DR on LI NY that turned off his CO monitor when he went to work early in the morning because he thought it was alarming incorrectly. He came home to find his family dead in their beds!
 
so we bought this house a few years back....
running on propane and has a co2 detector
had this thing go off a couple times in the past
couldnt figure it out until the pilot of the water heater
kept blowing out !
Backdraft !
Closed up a couple of holes in the vacinity and that all stopped.
Hasn't gone off for some time now.
Was up on the roof blowing out the gutters today and noticed the stack
was very very short. Lucky it was drafting at all.
Picked up another piece of pipe today. Install it tomorrow.
That should insure that this doesnt happen again.
Those detectors are life savers and belong in campers as well
rn
 
I've been looking at smoke and CO detectors and I bet not everyone knows that you can get wireless smoke and co detectors that talk to one another: if one goes off they all go off and they have voice alarms that tell you where the problem is! I didn't find a voice option when upgrading my hardwired system, but it is interconnected and you can get combo co/smoke alarms.

PS: I think you want to make sure you have some photo-electric smoke detectors as well as ionization, to pick up smoldering fires.
 
I have BK / First alert hardwired combo units, they interconnect and do the voice thing. I don't really find them that helpful, as the voice is so loud and fast it's hard to understand - sort of like a bad PA system... The other problem is if you have a false alarm - say from "over-enthusiastic" cooking - it can be a real pain trying to get ALL the detectors to shut up....

Gooserider
 
My oil furnace busted its exchanger the first year in my house. I have CO detectors on every floor now.
 
Three CO's in the split level. They work very well as even if you run a vehicle in the garage with the big door open and the entry door closed, the one in the basement by the stove will eventually alarm. Note that most units (Kidde for sure) are warrantied for many years, keep your receipt and you can usually get them replaced if they get goofy. One of my Kiddes was replaced at 6 years of age, no questions asked other than the serial number.
 
Two CO detectors in my home . . . and several photo-electric/ion smoke detectors.

P.S. To the original poster . . . thanks for not deleting the thread. As I was reading this I was going through all the possible reasons for that high a reading and couldn't come up with any real reason (i.e. the furnace was not being used and the natural draft of the woodstove should have not allowed any CO leakage . . . even with the wind and leaky seals) . . . it wasn't until I read your second post that everything made sense . . . and don't worry . . . we've all had "those moments."
 
velvetfoot said:
I've been looking at smoke and CO detectors and I bet not everyone knows that you can get wireless smoke and co detectors that talk to one another: if one goes off they all go off and they have voice alarms that tell you where the problem is! I didn't find a voice option when upgrading my hardwired system, but it is interconnected and you can get combo co/smoke alarms.

PS: I think you want to make sure you have some photo-electric smoke detectors as well as ionization, to pick up smoldering fires.

As goosesaid, the BRK/First Alert ones do have the voice with programmable locations. The earlier models the voice was kinda muffled, but they seem to have fixed that in the latest version. We use these exclusively at work (electrician) due to the reliability and no call backs.

The NFPA and most manufacturers recommend replacing the units every 5 years. Don't forget to change the battery twice a year also.

One last thing to look into First alert has recently came out with a rechargeable battery pack built in that is good for 5 years. However the unit is twice the price of a regular unit.
 
i also put in brk. they are the only company that makes smoke detectors that run after twenty years. that's right twenty years. my supply house has pulled the firex brand because of to much trouble. they don't even last the 5 years they give you for a warranty. i've gone into customers homes to look at other things and to my amazement i see twenty year old smoke detectors. light up a cigar and it sounds the alarm. brk has always been reliable. and yes they are loud and clear. i had one of those blackhawk and it just kept on giving me false readings and 888 and it only went off between 2 and 3 in the morning. thru that one out the window. the only thing i liked about the blackhawk is the digital display.
 
The hardwired photo/ion BRK alarm has a "turret" design that looks like the commercial units you see. Not fashionable maybe, but maybe functional.
 
Just a FYI . . . the NFPA and most other experts in the field recommend changing smoke detectors every 10 years and as I have mentioned before most folks suggest changing out CO detectors every 5 years (although the manufacturers vary in how often they suggest you change out their own brand -- I've heard as low as 3 years to as many as 7 years.)

That said, there is nothing to say you can't keep older detectors if you are so inclined . . . like anything else . . . they have a life expectancy and some will last longer and some will not last as long. In my own home for example I have an older CO detector that I still use today even though I "replaced" it with a newer CO detector once the original had gone by its 5 year anniversary . . . figured as long as it isn't giving me any nuisance alarms it cannot hurt to have an additional detector even though it's not my "primary" CO detector now.
 
I am glad I was able to provide a chuckle.

We are new to wood burning and I want to take this responsibility very seriously, for my family's sake. We changed the batteries in all the smoke detectors this fall - but I neglected to replace the one in my CO detector.

We had company staying with us too. When it first went off - I was looking at it (in the dark hallway) and all I could see was a red digital 97. It really scared me. It woke my 10 year old up and he climbed into our room, but my 4 year old and their cousins were still sleeping and camped out on the floor. I checked to see that each was snoring and breathing and turned on the ceiling fans. My wife told me to take it outside and check the reading - and of course it goes to zero.

I plug it back in and it gives the same reading. Now we open up a bunch of doors and windows and let the cold air in a panic thinking we are breathing dangerous levels and poisoning our blood. My brother and sister in law and the cousins - didn't even hear it or notice all the cold fresh air.

I went to the web site for Kidde and it wasn't until after my first post that I put it together = 97 is LB when you turn the unit over the right way. It was plugged in upside down. Lord help my dumbass. A big relief. My wife and I are still cracking up about this one. You all be safe!
 
i just wish there were a solid way of testing these c/o detectors. like smoke detectors push the button and it sounds. light up a cigar and put smoke all over the unit, and the good ones sound and the bad ones don't. a cigar is one of the best ways of checking a smoke detector other than real smoke from a fire. a can of smoke that fire depts or alarm people use is $15 dollars a can. and if you run across a detectors not working right you blow the can in 1 to 2 detectors. so a cigar works great and cheap. again i've tested smoke detector with the button on them and it sounded. same smoke detector in smoke and nothing.

but how can you simulate c/o to give the detector a real life test? i don't know. and if you read some of the detectors instructions it says at curtain lower levels of c/o the unit will have to sit in that low level for 1 or 2 hours before it sounds.
bottom line is you don't really know if it is working or not until something happens.
 
^^good question

i want one with a display...
they claim there's a logic circuit of some kind that monitors rise rate, etc of co
so it decides to go off or not...hmm

like my stinky LP water heater wont set it off, although i can smell it in the basement

(electrician), i put one in the other day that had a feature:
"point any IR remote control @ detector to silence alarm"
 
i'm really struggling with this co thing

i certainly dont want a dead family

i'm having a hard time comprehending enough co coming out of a wood stove to kill everyone
obviously it's happened, but
wouldn't there be some amount of smoke to accompany that level of co ??

is stove co odorless ??

i'm wondering exactly what happened to the dead DR family cause the only time i have draft issues, there isn't a huge fire rolling

also considering the integrity of my stove vs the integrity of my LP furnace heat exchanger, that btw doesn't shut off the fan if fire's rolling in the furnace, just the gas valve limit switch, if it's still working

maybe i have too much time on my hands, but i could disconnect the LP water heater flue & pipe it into my air return, then measure co @ the various detector locations in my house & hope i live through it..........ahahahhahahahahahahhaaaahh
 
fbelec said:
i just wish there were a solid way of testing these c/o detectors. like smoke detectors push the button and it sounds. light up a cigar and put smoke all over the unit, and the good ones sound and the bad ones don't. a cigar is one of the best ways of checking a smoke detector other than real smoke from a fire. a can of smoke that fire depts or alarm people use is $15 dollars a can. and if you run across a detectors not working right you blow the can in 1 to 2 detectors. so a cigar works great and cheap. again i've tested smoke detector with the button on them and it sounded. same smoke detector in smoke and nothing.

but how can you simulate c/o to give the detector a real life test? i don't know. and if you read some of the detectors instructions it says at curtain lower levels of c/o the unit will have to sit in that low level for 1 or 2 hours before it sounds.
bottom line is you don't really know if it is working or not until something happens.

Technically "testing" a smoke detector by simply pushing the test button only really tests that there is power to the unit and the audible alarm is working . . . in most, if not all, units it doesn't actually test the sensing unit.

As for the cigarette/cigar smoke . . . fair enough . . . unless you don't smoke and then you would have to resort to the can . . . or you could simply do the easy thing and make sure you have plenty of them in your home and replace them every 10 years.

I don't know of any CO testing method unfortunately.
 
EL DRIFTO said:
^^good question

i want one with a display...
they claim there's a logic circuit of some kind that monitors rise rate, etc of co
so it decides to go off or not...hmm

like my stinky LP water heater wont set it off, although i can smell it in the basement

(electrician), i put one in the other day that had a feature:
"point any IR remote control @ detector to silence alarm"

I think your electrician was talking about a smoke detector . . . BRK/First Alert has a dual ion/PE detector that you can silence with a TV remote or any other IR remote controller . . . very handy for cathedral or other high ceilings.

I will tell you that when it comes to CO detectors we tend to like the ones with the CO reading . . . it gives us an idea of what we may be dealing with or walking into . . . but that said, it's just a handy feature and not absolutely critical to have on a CO detector.
 
EL DRIFTO said:
i'm really struggling with this co thing It really is pretty simple . . . every CO detector out there has to pass muster with UL or FM testing. Just make sure you get one that has been tested by one of these labs . . . the seal should be right on the box.

i certainly dont want a dead family

i'm having a hard time comprehending enough co coming out of a wood stove to kill everyone
obviously it's happened, but
wouldn't there be some amount of smoke to accompany that level of co ?? Honestly, while there is a risk of CO poisoning from the woodstove . . . most likely from a stove with a bad draft . . . this is a very low risk situation. More risky are dumb folks using gasoline- or propane-powered generators inside, old kerosene or propane space heaters without venting, oil furnaces with cracked heat exchangers, etc. I cannot recall ever responding to a CO call involving a woodstove. That said, I would not be without a CO detector, because there is always the possibility of a problem and for $20-$40 I can avoid a potential bad day . . . plus I do have an oil boiler for back-up, heat my water with propane and have a propane cookstove. As for smoke or no smoke . . . depends . . . depends on where in the burn cycle the stove is -- coals can produce CO, but little smoke . .. which is another reason to not keep them inside the home even if covered.

is stove co odorless ?? Technically CO is always odor-less . . . but it often mixes with other products of combustion imparting a smell. Plus the danger of CO is that it can deaden the senses. The one risk I could see with CO possibly coming from a woodstove is if there was a down draft situation and the stove was in the coaling stage as there would be little smoke or smell. Unlikely to happen in most homes with a properly set up flue I would guess though.

i'm wondering exactly what happened to the dead DR family cause the only time i have draft issues, there isn't a huge fire rolling Not sure . . .

also considering the integrity of my stove vs the integrity of my LP furnace heat exchanger, that btw doesn't shut off the fan if fire's rolling in the furnace, just the gas valve limit switch, if it's still working

maybe i have too much time on my hands, but i could disconnect the LP water heater flue & pipe it into my air return, then measure co @ the various detector locations in my house & hope i live through it..........ahahahhahahahahahahhaaaahh I think it would be better to spend the extra time simply buying 1-2 CO detectors for your home and then cut up, split or stack some firewood for next year instead of worrying about this issue too much.
 
i never considered the co coming off the coals, all day long, after my draft has completely stopped or reversed

hasn't made a diff to my co detecors yet though

thanks
 
firefighterjake said:
EL DRIFTO said:
i'm really struggling with this co thing It really is pretty simple . . . every CO detector out there has to pass muster with UL or FM testing. Just make sure you get one that has been tested by one of these labs . . . the seal should be right on the box.
[/b][/i].

UL/FM doesn't mean the units aren't mass produced and that each one has been tested. You can have all the UL listing in the world but there are still a certain amount of just about all electrical components that will arrive DOA or that will die when first powered up. It's a mathmatical certainty with controls components (a very small percentage, but still there). No manfucturing process is perfect.

I think your best bet for "sleeping well at night" is to have two sensors in your house. Buy two of the cheaper units as opposed to one higher end unit and sleep well. If one goes off you'll always have the other to use to validate....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.