Speaking of Maple

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What kind of maple?
 
Well I don't know that yet, I emailed the person I got it from and asked, the tree is still standing, it was a power company trim job, hopefully he will get back to me..
 
Post of couple of pictures and you will know in short order.
 
Ok here's my score, can you guys ID the wood? I can take more photos if need be..
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2247.jpg
    IMG_2247.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 521
  • IMG_2248.jpg
    IMG_2248.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 554
  • IMG_2249.jpg
    IMG_2249.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 553
ggans said:
Ok here's my score, can you guys ID the wood? I can take more photos if need be..


Silver maple.
 
smokinjay said:
ggans said:
Ok here's my score, can you guys ID the wood? I can take more photos if need be..


Silver maple.

Yup!

Low btu - but very light and makes a good shoulder season wood. Lights fast. Goes out fast.
 
Very Light? this stuff must be full of water because it is very heavy.. In fact it's much like my Honey Locust, at least it seems like it..
 
Heavy now will get lighter when it drys. Get it in a good breezy sunny spot and split now and it should be ready to burn this season. I burned 4 or so cords the last couple of years and used it all season mixed with longer burning wood , just depends on when you can fill the box.
 
Look up red maple as it is very similar.

On the weight, yes, it is heavy with all that sap and you will be amazed at how light it can get. I have some soft maple that is 6 or 7 years old and some that I split small is really super light. Those I like to make into kindling.

Oh, and don't worry that it is not the highest on the btu scale. Methinks people worry too much about this. You can even read lots of posts and find that people who have never burned one particular type of wood try it and find that it really isn't so bad. There are still lots of btu's in that wood and if you notice anything it will be that it just doesn't hold the fire quite as long as oak or something similar. What about all these folks who heat with only pine? What do you think North of 60 would be like if he got hold of some of that maple you have? I'd bet he'd be dancing. So don't worry, it is good firewood.
 
ggans said:
When you say low BTU's how low compared to what? I can't find it listed in a BTU chart..

its 20 mbtu per cord I will take it!
 
Get it split now and you probably can use it by January. Once split it seems to dry pretty fast. If you can wait a year, then so much the better but if not, then it will give you heat this coming winter. Good luck.
 
ggans, that makes me very curious. Why do you not want to split it now?
 
I have around 3 cords of silver maple that was cut in July of last year, I had it split and stacked shortly after that. I split a piece yesterday just for kicks and it's still 30% in the middle! I was shocked it was still so high after hearing everyone say how fast it drys. I think it may be due to the time of year it was cut.
 
Backwoods Savage said:
ggans, that makes me very curious. Why do you not want to split it now?


I knew someone would ask, because I have an old coal burner with a big "fire Bowl" it likes big chunks of wood, splits don't work as well..
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3032.jpg
    IMG_3032.jpg
    63.1 KB · Views: 419
ggans said:
Backwoods Savage said:
ggans, that makes me very curious. Why do you not want to split it now?


I knew someone would ask, because I have an old coal burner with a big "fire Bowl" it likes big chunks of wood, splits don't work as well..

WOW! Thats Cool.
 
ggans, that is beautiful! You can just stand the wood vertically in those.

btw, in the big logs like that they will take a bit longer to dry. However, you don't have to be super dry with that stove. If you remember, please let us know next winter how the wood burns in that stove. Good luck.
 
Yes I can put them virtical and sometimes do. If there big and I dont want to cut or split them. I have put logs in that were 9 inches around and two two and a half feet tall. I then start a small fire next to it and go from there.

I prefer to keep the fire low in the bowl. it's easier on the old girl. After all I can't get replacement parts...

That stove was Patent in 1914...
 
That's beautiful, I came across an old stove like that last month in a barn outside of Vegas.
Not the same as yours but close in style.
 

Attachments

  • stove2.jpg
    stove2.jpg
    79 KB · Views: 254
  • stove.jpg
    stove.jpg
    81.8 KB · Views: 247
Status
Not open for further replies.