Wood Insert, liner, setup suggestions

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bhowe007

New Member
May 12, 2010
27
Upstate NY
Hello Everybody. This is my first time posting to this site even though I've been here for a lot of research over the past couple years. My wife and I own a 1250 square foot 1.5 cape. The foundation of the house dates back to the late 1800's although I think a lot of the structure has been updated throughout the years. I need to have some work done to the crown of our chimney and I'm thinking that now may be the time to get a fireplace insert.

I've attached a diagram of our layout. When we moved in the house leaked a lot of air so we had the crawl space and the rim board sealed with spray foam insulation. I've added 2x8's to the ceiling joists above our bedroom before we had additional dense pack blown in and we're now about R-40 over the bedroom (attic over the bedroom isn't heated) and R-40 in the attic over the main part of the house. About 1/2 the ceiling surface area on the second floor only has R-12 because of the 2x4 rafters (it's a cape so the second floor has part of the roofline as the ceiling). The flat section of our ceiling (small attic space) over the upstairs bedrooms also has r-40 insulation. Needless to say, the house is better but still leaks a lot. We went from a drafty barn to just a regular inefficient house.

I've been quoted $1200 to rebuild the crown of the chimney, $2300 for a Pacific Energy Super Insert or a Kodiak 1700 Enviro, $750 for a liner (includes insulating the top and bottom of the flue), $800 for labor and another $800 if I choose to have the whole liner insulated between the flue and the outside of the liner. Basically I can pay $1200 to have my fireplace fixed so it's not leaking H2O or I can pay $3500 (with the tax credit and not including the flue liner insulation) and have a new, safe flue, a new insert, lower heating bills, keep the warmth from going up my chimney and a non leaking fireplace.

If we go ahead with this project then I plan on cutting out two vents in the living room ceiling for heat to flow into the upstairs, another vent with a fan will go between the living room and the downstairs hallway wall to move heated air into the bedroom and up the upstairs hallway.

Can you critique this proposal? Specifically, I'm wondering:

1. Is it worth having the whole liner insulated
2. Are these inserts the best choices (manufacturers, sizes, burn rates)
3. Will the three vents be enough to move the heat and where could I buy a blast fan
4. Do the $ values seem correct
5. Would you advise putting a cold air return in the far end of the bedroom that would run in the basement back to the living room?

Thank you for being a great resource. I love the forum and I'm very happy to have such a knowledgeable group of minds to pull information from.

(The diagram only shows the first floor. The second floor is 1 bath and 2 bedrooms above the living room/kitchen/downstairs bathroom area)
 

Attachments

  • Picture 6.png
    Picture 6.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 472
I can answer #1. Yes. insulate the whole way - more for safety should you have a chimney fire - that's the reason for the code.
 
1) yes
2) yes
3) hmmmm, not sure. a very qualified maybe, but I would hold off for the first year. see #5.
4) the $800 additional for insulating seems high, but I don't know all the constraints involved. Need more info about the current flue.
5) an insulated return duct with a fan blowing from the bedroom to the the stove room might accomplish some good results. The fan doesn't have to be large. Maybe around ~200cfm?
 
Thank you BeGreen and CarbonNeutral for the responses. The current flue is 13" x 8" and deteriorating on the inside. The contractor feels as though insulating the top and bottom of the chimney are good enough, he doesn't really advise insulating the whole way. I talked to him again this morning and he quoted me $600 for the Thermix Insulation (not $800). I must have remembered the numbers incorrectly.

He used Duravent Flexible Stainless pipe. I had a gentleman tell me that Ventinox was the best on the market but this guy says they're both about the same.
 
If the interior of the flue is degraded, you definitely want to get it insulated. Simpson (duravent) is fine. Ask the dealer if the flue a straight shot through or if there are any offsets. If it is straight, ask the dealer what it would cost to install a Duraliner insulated liner (factory insulated) instead of pouring in thermix.
 
I will ask him. I think the throat of the fireplace is the real concern. There is a steel surround in the fireplace that will probably need to be cut to fit the liner. He also mentioned that the flexible pipe will jog around any flue irregularities.
 
Ok, he mentioned that he needs to make sure the pipe will jog around any inconsistencies in the flue and he needs the pipe to bend so that he can get through the throat of the chimney. He also mentioned that the insulated rigid pipe is thicker so you would have less area for the gases to travel through, but this isn't his main concern.
 
I would not advise doing a thermix pour insulation, especially in a fireplace. Insulating a flex liner with a 1/2 in ceramic wrap would be the more logical option. Lining any solid fuel appliances it is always highly recommended to insulate the entire liner.
 
Bhowe007 said:
Thank you BeGreen and CarbonNeutral for the responses. The current flue is 13" x 8" and deteriorating on the inside. The contractor feels as though insulating the top and bottom of the chimney are good enough, he doesn't really advise insulating the whole way. I talked to him again this morning and he quoted me $600 for the Thermix Insulation (not $800). I must have remembered the numbers incorrectly.

He used Duravent Flexible Stainless pipe. I had a gentleman tell me that Ventinox was the best on the market but this guy says they're both about the same.
Get your contractor to read the instructions for the Duravent he is using - if you are in an older house you likely have wood framing very near or touching the exterior of the brick chimney, therefore you need a zero clearance install - i.e. it needs to be insulated from the top down.

Insulating just the top and bottom is his attempt to seal air leakage around the flue, and will work to a degree, but a bottom block off plate is a better plan.

Insulating the liner is a code compliance issue if you aren't certain you have the required clearances to combustibles outside the brick chimney structure - a quick read if the instructions will show you and him the clearances needed.
 
The prices quoted seem pretty standard. Since you can get 30% back on the $600 spent to insulate the liner, making the net cost $420, it seems like a no brainer when considering the scope of the job. I may have missed if this has been covered, but how does adding a liner eliminate the need to repair the top of the chimney?

As far as brands go, there are a lot of good ones. I have personal experience with the PE Line and find it a very good brand of stove. As far as cutting holes to allow for air flow..In my experience, I dont cut holes until I spend a few weeks with a new product and see how the natural air flow of the house is. Homes all have their own personality when it comes to air flow. Charts and formulas are great, but it doesnt hurt to wait until some cold weather and some actual usage to see where the real cold spots are before addressing them.
 
Franks,

I would still need to get the crown fixed either way. If I get the crown fixed at the same time, I get a reduced priced for doing it all at once. Package deal vs just the crown. My guess is that the because the installer is also the dealer he's making some margin on the material so he's willing to do a little better on the overall price. That is a good idea to wait on cutting holes until we see how the insert heats. I hate doing work that doesn't really need to be done. I'm assuming I will need to cut holes because of the restricted airflow but at least if I do it after some experience then I'll know how much of a difference the vents actually made.

CleanBurnin and BeGreen,

What worries me is the contractors reluctance to discuss the rigid Duravent option. I would think that with the flexible lower piece that allows the stove to pass through the damper frame and the smokeshelf that this would still be a possible install. He also didn't bring up the possibility of the ceramic blanket insulation which Duravent recommends with their flexible liner. He only discussed the Thermix. I have a couple other guys coming to give me a quote and now I'm armed with some more information.
 
Bhowe007 said:
Ok, he mentioned that he needs to make sure the pipe will jog around any inconsistencies in the flue and he needs the pipe to bend so that he can get through the throat of the chimney. He also mentioned that the insulated rigid pipe is thicker so you would have less area for the gases to travel through, but this isn't his main concern.

The damper throat should be a solvable problem. For their system, Simpson makes insulated flex sections specifically for dealing with getting past the damper. Sounds like you and the dealer need to pow-wow over the Simpson liner catalog for the best solution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.