1 year Red Oak or 3 mo Elm/mulberry

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

midwestcoast

Minister of Fire
Oct 9, 2009
1,745
NW Indiana
I'm still working on truelly getting ahead & looking for some input on my burn plan for the year. I have:
~3/4 cord of very dry shoulder season wood and chunks. Burning now 'till real cold hits & leftovers in spring
~2/3 cord of Red Oak S/S for nearly 2 years now. My mid-winter wood.
~1 1/4 cord of Red Oak cut, split big & heaped in a field in small piles last fall, split smallish & re-stacked in the yard in early spring (fairly sunny spot). I was planning to burn this in late winter knowing it won't be ideal.
~1/2 cord Red Oak S/S in early spring. 2011-12 wood.
~2 cord of Elm & Mulberry C/S/S in a 4 pallete Holtz Hausen in late August. Planned 11-12 wood.

My question is, is it likely the greener Elm & Mulberry would burn better than the 1 year old Oak come this Jan/Feb? Even with it being in a HH instead of single-stack? I wasn't planning it that way, but all the grumbling about R.Oak & my experiences with it last year have me re-thinking.

Edit. For clarity
 
Option C... Mix in a split or two of new wood (elm and mulberry) with the old with each load. Keep the 1/2 cord of red oak for next year.

Matt
 
EatenByLimestone said:
Option C... Mix in a split or two of new wood (elm and mulberry) with the old with each load. Keep the 1/2 cord of red oak for next year.

Matt

I'm with Matt.
 
I think the oak will be better, assuming the mulberry and elm were alive when cut. If they were standing dead, then mulberry and elm.
 
Yea I think the 1 year old Oak would be better than 3 month old Mulberry. Mulberry IMO takes awhile to dry too.
 
midwestcoast said:
I'm still working on truelly getting ahead & looking for some input on my burn plan for the year. I have:
~3/4 cord of very dry shoulder season wood and chunks. Burning now 'till real cold hits & leftovers in spring
~2/3 cord of Red Oak S/S for nearly 2 years now. My mid-winter wood.
~1 1/4 cord of Red Oak cut, split big & heaped in a field in small piles last fall, split smallish & re-stacked in the yard in early spring (fairly sunny spot). I was planning to burn this in late winter knowing it won't be ideal.
~1/2 cord Red Oak S/S in early spring. 2011-12 wood.
~2 cord of Elm & Mulberry C/S/S in a 4 pallete Holtz Hausen in late August. Planned 11-12 wood.

My question is, is it likely the greener Elm & Mulberry would burn better than the 1 year old Oak come this Jan/Feb? Even with it being in a HH instead of single-stack? I wasn't planning it that way, but all the grumbling about R.Oak & my experiences with it last year have me re-thinking.

Edit. For clarity

No.
 
Thanks to all. Sticking with the plan & will likely be mixing dryer stuff in with the oak.
 
Just wanted to update this post with some results.
The advice was bang-on, thanks guys.
I've had no problem at all burning the 1year old Red Oak. I was mixing it in with 3 year oak earlier in the year, but found it unnecessary. I've been getting good heat and secondaries with air closed right down. Chimney is staying cleaner than last year too.
I've burnt a few pieces of the Mulberry & Elm just out of curiosity & found: the Mulberry is waaaay to wet & the Elm is far from ideal.
 
Flip a coin!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.