Air to Water Heat Pump (aka Hydronic Distribution of WBF heat)

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

leejad

New Member
Oct 5, 2010
16
Manitoba
Hello, all,

My first post, after lurking and learning (thanks much, smart posters...)

Writing about efficient distribution of heat from WB inserts to rest of home (ROH) using air to water heat pump and hydronic distribution.

Im sorely tempted to post details of my situation and early designs. Instead, I'll pose an early general question and request stories in response:

Have you considered it (or done it) Air to Water heat capture of heat from WB Insert /FP for whole-house distribution, somehow?

Cheers!
 
Yes, read them, but I am thinking about design a little more purposefully gone about to capture and distribute as much heat from the WBFI as possible.

I have a plan in place... should I post that for comment?
 
I assume you mean something along the lines of a commercial hydronic system with water based heat pumps.

That is a marginal system for a commercial use where heating and cooling is needed at the same time.

IMHO, it is a complete waste of time and electricity to transfer heat with a compressor when you can easily heat the water with a boiler, or move the air around even without ductwork if the heating load is modest enough and the house is compact or open enough.

Even the most efficient heat pumps have a COP of around 5 or 6 meaning it will cost you 20% just to move the heat, and you won't find one that is designed to take heat out of hot air.
 
I agree that in many homes, the bother and expense is not at all worth it.

I'm a little surprised that you are down on the Air-to-water Heat pump. I hear the Geyser is a great little unit, and there are others for more aggressive applications. This application is gaining traction, albeit slowly. I am not a professional, but as a layman I am getting very interested.

In my case, and for folks in my kind of situation, FP heat to Water seems like the holy grail. For instance, my property is 3 story 4000' sq. Dutch Colonial w. nice brick veneer in Winnipeg. My heating bill is not funny. Yes, I am constantly upgrading insulation, but now I'm paying extra attention to heating plant and hydronic distribution. I am big on wood heat as a lifestyle, and see a glimmer of an economic argument forming via heat pumps to invest aggressively in wood heat.

Currently 2 Masonry FP's on 1st floor, Both on left side of house. Many French doors, 7 bedrooms, NOT open space planning, at all, and with 6 foot 1/4 sawn oak wainscoting all over and red 1/4 sawn oak floors, there won't be any new air ducts happening. My neighborhood is full of houses like this, and we pay way to much to Gas company.

I am preparing for conversion to Radiant Floor heating from Cast Iron Rad's. The lower water temperature and zoning is highly attractive. I will soon invest in modern modulating Gas boiler and indirect HW tanks.

Now I am thinking, if well designed, I can heat the entire home in winter with the heat from the FP's, largely converted to hot water though the Air to Water heat pump, distributed via PEX to all heating zones (and snow melt applications, a very big plus here.)

If I install proper Inserts w/ blowers into both MFP's, they will cook us on one side of the house. I _have_ to move this heat. I can distribute some heat to rest of 1st floor with Air movement, but 2nd and 3rd stories are a bust (largely) as is basement.

Installing WB inserts (Likely Don-Bar) into MFP's with Ash dump blowers and reversible fans is being investigated. Negative pressure and healthy flu is biggest concern, but I think we have the problem it licked. Blower fans will reverse on Temp. reading in FP rooms reaching target. Air from other rooms will be supplied by some existing venting (and rooms are 600 and 700 sq. feet with high ceilings.) We should be good on the flu's.

If we can divert heated air directly from FP's to Heat Pump, the efficiency of Heat Pump will go way, way up. So much so that, if my math is correct, a fairly modest HP unit can provide DHW (year round, a very big plus) and much of winter's Hydronic heating at low temp.'s for the entire house.

My heating engineer friend said 'dude, why not a hydronic heat exchanger right at the FP'... we all know why not (I still need insurance.) But hot air, via the heat pump, this my insurance company will not be able to nix.

So the upshot is that, by diverting the excess heat from the FP's to the heat pump, the 'why would you heat pump hot air that you already paid for..." argument is solved.

Definitely poke holes in my plan if you see them, or, if you like this idea, feel free to add notions or experiences.
 
My first reaction-if you are interested in efficiency, ditch the insert idea and install a wood burning boiler. It didn't look like the Don-Bar inserts have a secondary burn system of any type (correct me if I'm wrong), so you are loosing the most efficiency right at the beginning of the heating process.

However, I also have a situation in which the wood stove is creating too much heat for the space it is in, and am having difficulty getting it moved where I need it. Please throw out some of the numbers and the specific mechanical schemes you have contemplated. The fact that the heat pump water heater is not exactly fast recovery might be less of an disadvantage in radiant heat than for domestic hot water, with a properly designed system. Show us what you have done so far.
 
Quick reply: I cannot speak for Don-Bar, of course, and I don't even have the unit yet. But the option to divert the air stream seems to function something like a secondary burn / air wash, and allows one open it up for an open fireplace experience (which my family loves.) I do hear they kick off a _lot_ of heat for their size.

I am especially concerned with mixing the value of the romance and ambience of the insert with the value of the functionality of the Wood burning boiler (oh and yes I certainly did look at the WBB's... but they aren't getting my evening family time / romance quota filled.)

Working on your request for schematics / numbers (I'm early on, but the request is motivating.) Thanks for your repsonse!
 
I'm not "down on heat pump water heaters". They are a great idea, and will be very useful when the price falls into line with the simplicity of the product. They are not the holy grail. They work great in Florida where cooling and dehumidification are useful year round and natural gas isn't common.

I don't see "the glimmer of economic argument" here. You could easily heat the place with a wood boiler and the existing radiators. Or you could burn more wood with an insert and cobble in a duct system. Or you could change from radiators to radiant, add a heat pump to heat the radiant in addition to a better boiler, and add two inserts to heat the heat pump. Only one of these options is a well designed system.

I want to see the numbers. COP for the heat pump at the temps you're talking about. Efficiency of the insert. Cost of electricity, gas, wood and proposed system. It just doesn't add up to me.

Hopefully you're not talking about removing your cast iron radiators, in my limited experience they are worth saving. Thermostatic valves can control each room individually and you can utilize remarkably low water temps if the building is tight enough to make the radiators over sized. I would look at adding a condensing gas boiler, and using the inserts for ambiance.
 
Benjamin, low temp Cast Iron I had not thought about enough (I'm insulating all walls with Injection, so they would end up being 'oversized'.)

My boiler is a Weil-Mc Series 12 Size 7 @ 174000 output. I'm used to the Rad's running hot, or not running, with nothing much in between.

If I can drop the temp significantly, and use the TRV's, then instead of a second insert w/ heat pump and low-temp. in floor, I could use an outdoor reset unit to control the WM boiler better (?), and get that water temp way down.

My biggest deficiency is not knowing enough about this big old boiler, and having unfortunately contracted a firm that is pretty hard to deal with. It is only 10 years old, so lots of love left in the boiler.

Will the boiler be negatively affected by running the water temp. @ lower heats, do you think?
 
Yes, without a doubt, the boiler will have a reduced life expectancy if it's run cool enough to get condensation inside.

That may mean it only lasts another 30 years, or 5. Hopefully by the time it rusts out you'll have saved more than enough to buy a Munchkin.
 
Stuck at the COP for the Insert.

The Highest Air Temp. numbers I find go up to 30 Degrees Celsius.

Does anyone have access to COP table with higher input air values (ie. something likely to be seen with air directly blown from a fireplace insert?)
 
What are you talking about? Capturing heat from the flue gas or from the room? If its in the room, just blow it to where you need it and you'll be 20-30% ahead energy wise than paying to electrically heat using the inefficiency of a heat pump. Leaving the fridge door open just heats your house.


Your boiler would save a bit if you used an outdoor reset on a mixing loop to send mixed water to your radiators. Don't let your cast iron boiler condense with too low return temps. TRV's to let you set some rooms colder will save the most.

Don't rip out rads to get baseboard, your rads are likely oversized and can run at lower temps now you have insulated.

There are some european water heaters that look like wood stoves but have a heat exchanger/water jacket. That would be more efficient than the Rube Goldberg affair of chaining systems together with heat pumps and multiple heat exchangers.
 
Hi, slowsuzuki,

Sorry if I have been too vague.

With some fireplace inserts, there are blowers that heat air surrounding the firebox, and blow it into the room. In some conditions, there can be too much hot air available to that room. We could simply turn off the blower, but I feel that would let a lot of valuable energy up the chimney. I plan to run these inserts a lot, so it is a lot of energy.

I am proposing a blower which, by blowing from a fan in basement through a vent in the ash dump and out louvres on sides of inserts, can (under the right conditions) reverse the blower to deliver this very hot air to very near to the air source heat pump intake instead of to the fireplace room. I believe that the COP at these temps would be very high, although I do not yet know how high. I may need to find out in a real trial.

In my application, I am looking to install radiant floor heating (for a number of reasons), and deliver as much of this over-abundance of heat from our inserts as possible (I have 2 inserts in bottom left corner of home) to the rest of the home. In a large home, with very long cold winters, a $5500.00 per year annual heating bill is the baseline.

When no excess from the fires are available, the boiler has the whole task with very little (if any) support from the heat pump.

I'm already looking at replacing or modifying a great deal of this 1913 home's heating and DHW systems. I thought (still think) that finding a connection between the new inserts' excess heat and an air source heat pump could make economic sense.

AFIAK, one cannot get insurance for their home in North America if they have a hydronic heat exchanger on the Fireplace itself like they do in Europe. Air exchange seems the only viable solution.
 
Hi Northern,

First, things first, your chimney has to stay above a minimum temperature to function in both the short term (draft) and long term (condensing in the chimney of any kind will ruin it in short order, creosote if you also have cool poor combustion).
Second, an insert can't radiate from all sides like a normal stove, so the fan is fitted, but it is probably sized to prevent over cooling of the unit.
Third, a stove pipe style heat extractor is not permitted by insurance companies because they can easily over cool.

Making a small hot air exchanger (little radiator) to pickup heat from the blower before it is dumped in the room is one more efficient option. Blowing the hot air itself to where it is needed is the most efficient method bar none.

If you are using radiant, using a heat pump to increase the temp to higher than what is needed in the floor, then mixing back down to the floor temp is wasteful of the electrical energy you are putting into the heat pump. Infloor radiant (in concrete or gypcrete) only needs about 90 f, easily produced at a heat exchanger by the stove directly into the floor.

Your big rads won't work well at these low temps though.

If you blow heat to your heat pump, where are you sending the waste heat? It can only drop the temp so many degrees, most of the heat will pass by the coils to do what? Heat your basement? Do you need heat there? Probably not if you are pumping heat out of there to heat water.

It sounds like you have an old inefficient boiler, you can probably pickup several % gain (hundreds of dollars savings) by having it tuned up or replaced by a newer higher efficiency model.

If you are determined to go your way, get a heat loss calc. See if your heat pump can handle the output you are asking of it (likely not) and understand you will likely need to install a proper heat source for your radiant in the long run for it to perform well.
 
HOLY $$$$

What is your heating degree day figure up there? All I could find was 5,800 but that must be metric ehh?

I've got a 3,000 sf 1928 two story that cost's around $1,000 (NG) a winter including hot water and renters controlling the thermostat. You've got plenty of room for improvement before you worry about reinventing the hybrid heating system. With that load, any number of boilers would work vastly better than inserts.
 
As much as I love my city, I'm afraid this is the downside (well, that and mosquitos being our Provincial bird...) The heating days figure is at 5900 (calculated in Celsius.) Highest for a 'southern' Canadian city (take that, Edmonton...).

Benjamin, you are right, there is plenty of room for improvement, and my banker and Manitoba Hydro can attest to our dedication to improving. Bought low, with all parties knowing this project was inevitable part of the price. The walls are 'air insulated', and the unique brick veneer outside and interior wainscoting inside meaning polyurethane injections on an epic scale (DIY). All three attics are now done, Footings almost done, and I have started on the walls (aggressively, with pictures available...)

Now the inserts are about more than just heating. They are a quality of life thing, and 2 high quality 'romantic' fireplaces have good value on their own apart from practical heating. Absolutely, both the boiler and the DHW heater are on the upgrade list (modulating Gas boiler, outdoor thermal resets, indirect fired DHW. and highly zoned). The energy savings and Rebates should (at least mostly) pay for the system upgrades and insulation within about 10 years. The added value to the home is _truly significant_, most importantly because it reduces the yearly costs famously associated with such properties.

The Cast Iron Rad system is so much better than forced air (I believe), but not nearly as good as radiant floors. I gain back massive amounts of 'normally usable' square footage with radiant floors by removing monstrous rad's, and I am replacing the 2nd and 3rd floors with new hardwood anyway (1st floor joists are accessible via basement.) I definitely looked at Thermostatic valves last year, but decided to wait and do it 'right' with radiant floors retrofit. Not to mention the much lower temps. give me interesting flexibility with the proposed system over high-temp. rads.

Slowzuki, you are right on about flu temps of course, and I believe there must be two thermostats involved in the activation of the Ash dump blower fans. One just behind the insert (to maintain the required temp. for optimum fire and flu operation) and one in the room (to tell the motor to when reverse and send to heat pump.) I am making sure that we _do not develop negative pressure_ if the fans reverse (the biggest hurdle that must not fail.) The cubic foot calc. and old forced air vents in one room from past system should do the trick on that front.

And if I could vent this air to the rest of house to good enough effect, I would. But I can't. Lots of people like me can't (but wish they could...)

All things considered, I have decided against planning for Geothermal or solar as the 'green (and cheap?) energy sources' in favour of wood fire and air source heat pump as described.

Regarding the matter generally: Air Source heat pump in Winnipeg (and similar climates) is as useless for heating as one could possibly imagine (why reclaim paid-for heat?? there isn't any in the outside winter air most of the winter, I assure you.)

UNLESS:

a. one has a source of low-cost heat with an abundance of excess and wasted energy (literally up the chimney...)

and

b. one has a modern (hydronic) storage and distribution system for rest of house and DHW, and a need for cooling and dehumidifying in the warmer months.

and

c. one has the fiscal argument in favour of the initial investment (ie. Northern climate + Urban high sq'. + high number of occupants)

In such a case, the ability to capture, store, and very efficiently distribute the excess heat from the fireplaces in winter is possibly the 'holy grail' for this small but important class of homes (important because they are currently _not green_.) Compared to Solar (my, aren't those attractive...) or Ground source, high efficiency fireplace inserts w/ air to water HP add value above and beyond the fiscal payback.

The COP for the heat pumps seems to be, @ 31 degrees Celsius, 6.5. There is a fairly steady rise in COP of approx. 1 for every 10 degrees from 0, and I assume (no data to back it yet...) that rise continues to the temp. of the air coming from the Fireplace blowers.

I'll keep working on this, but for now, I have to crawl under the library and cut the old radiant floor system off the joists (literally a cast iron rad attached to the joists causing sag in floor... sigh.)
 
Hi northern,

Given you are now talking about pumping hot air outside, to blow onto the coils of a heat pump, with no ability to use the waste heat, I can firmly say, you are wasting energy. There are high velocity duct systems that let you move a lot of air via a 3 or 4" duct if you can't fit traditional ductwork into place. The fan has to go near the inlet though.

Otherwise, collect the heat with a water air heat exchanger at the insert and pump it to where you need it. Your insert isn't going to produce enough heat to replace your main heat source though by collecting via tacked on designs. You would need a euro style integral back heater to do it with an insert.

Follow a little math:

A big insert produces say 15 kW of heat. With a large glass door, about 5ish kW goes to the room via radiant heat. The other 10 kW heats air convectively. You might be able to capture 5 kW of that with your collection method.

5 kW is blown out to a heat pump coil, you might optimistically collect 3 kW of that with a good enclosure and careful design, the rest is blown outside wasted.

Your heat pump is probably 3 ton or so to cool in the winnipeg summer, so it takes about 3 kW of electricity to run it, much of that gets into refrigerant or other useful places. We'll be nice and assume all of it does. So you end up with 6 kW delivered to be input to your home.

Of that 6 kW, 3kW is electric power, and you tossed 2 kW of your wood heat outside to the wind. So it "costs" you 5 kW to move 6 kW to somewhere useful in your home.
 
The COP isn't really important, only applies when you have an unlimited huge sink of constant temperture to draw from. A 3 ton heat pump drawings 3 kW, operating at a COP of 10, is going to need over 30 kW to be absorbed the outside coils, meaning you need almost 50 kW delivered to the coils to even hope to keep the temp steady. You can't do that with your inserts, and if you had enough output to do that, you'd blow almost 20 kW past the coils to heat the great outdoors!
 
My bad, slowzuki, I am putting the heat pump in the basement! Should have stated that more clearly.

You are right of course, if it were outside, that would be... strange to consider.

The heat pump would be located very near the FP's, but one floor down in the basement, very near the Storage. The blower vents would be short, and directed right near the heat pump intake.

The waste heat I am thinking about is when I turn the blowers off because, with 2 FP's running on one side of house on main floor, it will simply be too hot in that area to run the blowers. So I'll turn them off, which lets the air escape up the chimney...

If I'm going to run one FP (carry wood, etc.), it is trivial extra effort to run both. I'd much rather use the 2nd insert 'extra heat' to heat hot water and use it variously.

I really, really wish I could by-pass the air-to-water step and stay in the hydronic loop as you suggest. That was what I had planned to do, and heating engineer friend offered to help design heat exchangers. But I need insurance, and until I hear otherwise, a hydronic heat exchanger behind the FP is a no-go insurance wise.

Isn't it??
 
A hydronic hx external to the chimney and firebox, especially if engineered, should be of no concern to your insurance unless they are concerned about flooding/pipe breaks? What is the difference between blowing air through an R-134a heat exchanger vs a water heat exchanger? Can they stop you from putting a kettle on your stove top?

The insurance company doesn't want creosote and chimney fires caused by things folks used to stick in the flue on the old smoke dragons. They aren't that dangerous with epa type stoves but can cause problems so its easier to simply ban them.

The bigger problem you are going to have is capturing a useful amount of heat from your inserts to use elsewhere. If you do manage to, the next problem will be your basement is going to be hot dumping all that heat in there.

Why do you have a heat pump inlet in your basement? How big of basement is it? You must "heat" it with your A/C cycle of the heat pump in the summer?
 
I looked into these units last year and discovered that the Geyser type air to water heat pump will not work efficiently year round in B.C. never mind Manitoba. They are a good fit for cooling climates not heating climates. The problem is that they pump out cold air much like an air conditioner, they are actually stealing warmth from the surrounding air. Unless you don't mind have a frigid basement in January you will just end up using more energy to reheat the space one of these units has cooled.
 
The poster is basically talking about using his insert stove, to heat the basement, then use the heat pump to transfer the heat to a storage tank, then to a radiant floor. I think he understands how it works, just not all the stacked inefficiencies he'd be causing.
 
Well, close. Yes, the basement will heat up some, which is not a terrible thing. My work shop is down there, as is laundry room. But with the blower vent directed to the Heat Pump, a significant portion of the heat will be likely be captured and stored in water.

I was kinda hoping to hear from someone who had actually considered or effected something like this. Maybe no-one has.

I'll try is out, and then report (hopefully something positive....)
 
I can't speak to your plan but I do have a Geyser heat pump and it works great. My gut says you would need a lot of them to heat a house or a portion of a house.

But for hot water I'm very pleased so far.

I've had it almost 3 months now and I got it From Tom in Maine, great pre-purchase guidance and post purchase support.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.