larger insert installed in an exterior chimney (SOLVED)

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

grumpydaddy

New Member
Nov 8, 2010
4
South Jersey
I was all set to go with a 70,000 BTU Osburn 2200 when I started to look into the 100,000 BTU Osburn 2400 with the idea that bigger is better. A look through the owners manual caused me to think that the 2400 might be too much for my situation. Here's what jumped out at me:

1.5.3.3 Exterior Chimney
Chimneys constructed outside of the home on an exterior wall should be avoided if possible, especially in
colder climates. Exterior chimneys may not draft well and in fact may down draft (reverse flow) due to the
difficulty in heating them up to operating temperature while trying to evacuate the stack gases. All else
being equal, cooler chimneys will have less draft than hotter ones; this may lead to creosoting and poor
performance. If an exterior chimney is used to remove the stack gases the best results will be obtained by
using a connector vertically off the unit to the highest possible point before elbowing off horizontally to the
chimney. For efficiency and safety reasons the stove must not be installed with an insulated chimney
connected directly to the appliance.


This paragraph confuses me to be honest. It can't be found in the 2200 manual. I'm concerned about the final sentence. I was planning to drop an insulated flex liner down my existing exterior chimney. This seems to be a no-no for the 2400, although I can't quite figure out why. Could it be that this unit is just too much for my situation?

Thanks,
Mike

EDIT: Just realized that I had downloaded the .PDF file for the 2400 stand alone rather than the insert.
 
I think that is pure bs,if i were u i would do just what u had in mind!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
That paragraph confuses me too... I have the Clydesdale, which is rated to 60,00 btus. I have it on an exterior chimney and it drafts just fine. Now my chimney is pretty tall, maybe 30+ feet, so I think that adds to the draft. No idea why the 2400 would be any different than the 2200. My guess is I wouldn't worry too much about it. I'm sure someone more knowledgable will chime in and clear this up for you.
 
The paragraph in the Osburn 2400 manual is a result of being a manufacturer located in a colder climate. Outside chimneys with a stove located in the basement, are hard to get going at 35-40 below. When the chimney runs inside the house, it stays warm and it a lot easier to get a fire going.

As connecting an insulated chimney directly to the flue collar, it doesn't pertain to a liner. I've seen people connecting a class A chimney right fromt he flue of the stove...since the pipe is soo heavy and dense, it takes forever to warm up and the draft is harder to get going.

So if you are taking the 2400 insert, you can connect your insulated liner and I recommend you do so. That's the best way to go.

I will forward your comments to our marketing team and have that paragraph written in a better manner.

The 2400 insert is an awesome insert...tested and proven. You will love it!
 
Interesting but I would venture a guess at the Last sentence holds some relevance. The 90 degree turn at the top of the chimney, I can see how that would slow the flue gases down enough to hold heat better in the chimney, thats thermal dynamics. not sure on the insulation though. I have a non insulated stainless liner on an exterior chimney, and I dont have a problem, much smaller insert however.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.