Anyone have any experience burning biobricks mixed with semi seasoned wood?If so how was the heat output and burn times compared to burning seasoned wood ?
Rich L said:Anyone have any experience burning biobricks mixed with semi seasoned wood?If so how was the heat output and burn times compared to burning seasoned wood ?
CTYank said:Rich L said:Anyone have any experience burning biobricks mixed with semi seasoned wood?If so how was the heat output and burn times compared to burning seasoned wood ?
Let's get the concepts straight. Seems you have, or anticipate having, overly wet wood? How wet? Talk to us about moisture content. $10 will buy you a basic moisture meter. (IOW "semi seasoned" is meaninglessly fuzzified.)
In an "EPA" stove, I find that burning wood with MC > 15% presents problems. More difficult to get lit and keep lit. More tendency to smoke, blacken window, etc. Then, too, burning it is less efficient than if it were fully air-dried. You likely have more options than you suspect:
1 get going with some serious scrounging now, focusing on dead-standing;
2 sort your stack by MC; some of it may be ready for burning, some may be ready for
3 finish drying wood indoors near the stove; it's possible to see a serious drop in MC in a short time.
Dare you to catch me burning wood with MC > 10%.
Ha,Ha!! Thats funny! But seriously -- if what you mean by "semi-seasoned" wood is , say 25% MC, and thats all you have, then I would say you will make out just fine mixing it with Bio-Bricks. If you mean 30%, then you will have a very frustrating winter.cptoneleg said:CTYank said:Rich L said:Anyone have any experience burning biobricks mixed with semi seasoned wood?If so how was the heat output and burn times compared to burning seasoned wood ?
Let's get the concepts straight. Seems you have, or anticipate having, overly wet wood? How wet? Talk to us about moisture content. $10 will buy you a basic moisture meter. (IOW "semi seasoned" is meaninglessly fuzzified.)
In an "EPA" stove, I find that burning wood with MC > 15% presents problems. More difficult to get lit and keep lit. More tendency to smoke, blacken window, etc. Then, too, burning it is less efficient than if it were fully air-dried. You likely have more options than you suspect:
1 get going with some serious scrounging now, focusing on dead-standing;
2 sort your stack by MC; some of it may be ready for burning, some may be ready for
3 finish drying wood indoors near the stove; it's possible to see a serious drop in MC in a short time.
Dare you to catch me burning wood with MC > 10%.
You crazy Woodpecker what do you burn your furniture 15% presents problems, if you have problems with 15% MC your problem is probably your cheap meter. :zip:
cptoneleg said:CTYank said:Rich L said:Anyone have any experience burning biobricks mixed with semi seasoned wood?If so how was the heat output and burn times compared to burning seasoned wood ?
Let's get the concepts straight. Seems you have, or anticipate having, overly wet wood? How wet? Talk to us about moisture content. $10 will buy you a basic moisture meter. (IOW "semi seasoned" is meaninglessly fuzzified.)
In an "EPA" stove, I find that burning wood with MC > 15% presents problems. More difficult to get lit and keep lit. More tendency to smoke, blacken window, etc. Then, too, burning it is less efficient than if it were fully air-dried. You likely have more options than you suspect:
1 get going with some serious scrounging now, focusing on dead-standing;
2 sort your stack by MC; some of it may be ready for burning, some may be ready for
3 finish drying wood indoors near the stove; it's possible to see a serious drop in MC in a short time.
Dare you to catch me burning wood with MC > 10%.
You crazy Woodpecker what do you burn your furniture 15% presents problems, if you have problems with 15% MC your problem is probably your cheap meter. :zip:
Jotul Rockland - CT said:If you give your scenario, it will enable us to make valid suggestions.
I burned Bio bricks and questionable wood last year.
Rich L said:Jotul Rockland - CT said:If you give your scenario, it will enable us to make valid suggestions.
I burned Bio bricks and questionable wood last year.
I asked the dealer where I bought my Lopi from about using biobricks in the Lopi.He said never burn just biobricks in the Lopi alone because they'll get to hot for the stove and cause damage.He added I could burn biobricks in the stove if I mixed in some semi seasoned wood which would keep the stove from getting too hot.
So what happened when you used biobricks with the questionable wood ?
Rich L said:Anyone have any experience burning biobricks mixed with semi seasoned wood?If so how was the heat output and burn times compared to burning seasoned wood ?
karl said:I'm going to get flamed here but here goes. I read a pdf file from some college study regarding burning unseasoned wood. I forget where I found it, but I'll look. The article basically said it's not a big deal as long as you burn it at a high temperature. They suggested mixing in dry wood to get the temperature up. Sounds like what you want to do. It's also something virtually all of us on this forum have done at one time or another. I did a little math to see if what they were saying makes sense. It does. I recreated my problem here.
We have two splits. Each contains 10 pounds of wood. One is at 15% moisture. The other is at 30% moisture. The temperature of the wood is 60 F. I assumed the wood was brought from the outside and aloud to sit inside and warm up a bit. A BTU is the amount of heat required to raise one pound of water one degree F. We need to raise it to 212 F to get it boil out of the wood. Actually, it will start coming out of the wood at a much cooler temperature but lets not worry about that. So we need to raise the temperature of water in the split 152 F. We get 8000 btu per pound of wood.
15% split 30% split
10 pounds of wood 10 pounds of wood
1.5 pounds of water 3 pounds of water
10x8000= 80,000 btu 10x8000= 80,000 btu
1.5x152= 228 btu 3x152= 456 btu
80,000-228= 79,772 btu 80,000-456= 79,544 btu
79,772-79,544 = 228 btu
79,544/79,772 =0.9971418542847114 or 99.7%
So the wet split will put out 99.7% of the heat of the dry one, and that's going from a 'way too wet to burn' split to an ideal split. The problem is getting the wood hot in the first place. This takes dry wood and a hot fire. Last year, I had some really nasty wet wood that would not burn. I found I could put a couple of wet splits in with dry without any problem, but I could not put wet splits in by themselves. Not even on a bed of hot coals.
I believe in math, but I have to admit, I have a hard time believing that the wet stuff puts out 99.7% as much heat as the dry one.
Backwoods Savage said:What would we do without engineers?
Ugh. Me do old Indian trick. Cut wood, wait many moons until dry, burn wood, carry out ashes. Go cut more wood.
fredarm said:I mixed Bio-bricks with semi-seasoned wood (didn't have a moisture meter then) my first year burning and it worked fine. Wood that didn't burn particularly well on its own burned fine when mixed with the bricks. I put the wood in the back of the firebox and the bricks in the front and it burned from front to back drying the wood out as the bricks burned. I wouldn't try it with green wood, but it worked well with semi-seasoned wood. I still mix bricks with wood--I usually go through a cord of wood and a ton of bricks each winter. I can stack the bricks in the garage where they are easily accessible when there's 2 feet of snow on the ground. Four bricks and a quarter of a Supercedar are a great way to start a fire, too.
Slow1 said:karl said:I'm going to get flamed here but here goes. I read a pdf file from some college study regarding burning unseasoned wood. I forget where I found it, but I'll look. The article basically said it's not a big deal as long as you burn it at a high temperature. They suggested mixing in dry wood to get the temperature up. Sounds like what you want to do. It's also something virtually all of us on this forum have done at one time or another. I did a little math to see if what they were saying makes sense. It does. I recreated my problem here.
We have two splits. Each contains 10 pounds of wood. One is at 15% moisture. The other is at 30% moisture. The temperature of the wood is 60 F. I assumed the wood was brought from the outside and aloud to sit inside and warm up a bit. A BTU is the amount of heat required to raise one pound of water one degree F. We need to raise it to 212 F to get it boil out of the wood. Actually, it will start coming out of the wood at a much cooler temperature but lets not worry about that. So we need to raise the temperature of water in the split 152 F. We get 8000 btu per pound of wood.
15% split 30% split
10 pounds of wood 10 pounds of wood
1.5 pounds of water 3 pounds of water
10x8000= 80,000 btu 10x8000= 80,000 btu
1.5x152= 228 btu 3x152= 456 btu
80,000-228= 79,772 btu 80,000-456= 79,544 btu
79,772-79,544 = 228 btu
79,544/79,772 =0.9971418542847114 or 99.7%
So the wet split will put out 99.7% of the heat of the dry one, and that's going from a 'way too wet to burn' split to an ideal split. The problem is getting the wood hot in the first place. This takes dry wood and a hot fire. Last year, I had some really nasty wet wood that would not burn. I found I could put a couple of wet splits in with dry without any problem, but I could not put wet splits in by themselves. Not even on a bed of hot coals.
I believe in math, but I have to admit, I have a hard time believing that the wet stuff puts out 99.7% as much heat as the dry one.
However, if you add it up, you are actually comparing a 11.5 lb split to a 13lb split. Re-do your calculations holding the total fed into the stove constant (include the water weight - reduce the wood fiber weight - hold the total weight constant making the first 8.5lb wood/1.5 water and the second 7lb wood/3lb water), and you will find your overall difference is more on the order of 82%. Not flaming, just trying to point out that to believe in the math be sure you are modeling what you wish to represent. By holding the weight of the split going in constant you can summize that the net BTU/Lb is about 18% lower for the 30% water wood.
15% wood calc:
Split Weight: 10 lb
Water Weight: 1.5 Lb
Wood Fibre: 8.5 lb
Wood BTU : 8.5 * 8000 = 68000 btu
Water BTU Loss = 1.5lb * 152 = 228 btu
Net BTU = 68000 - 228 = 67772 btu
30% wood calc:
Split Weight: 10 lb
Water Weight: 3 Lb
Wood Fibre: 7 lb
Wood BTU : 7 * 8000 = 56000 btu
Water BTU Loss = 3lb * 152 = 456 btu
Net BTU = 56000 - 456 = 55544 btu
55544/67772=.8195... or approx 82%
Math can't prove this one. Let's make up something that is highly unlikely, but still possible. I dunno if it is or not, but here we go...karl said:15% split 30% split
10 pounds of wood 10 pounds of wood
1.5 pounds of water 3 pounds of water
10x8000= 80,000 btu 10x8000= 80,000 btu
1.5x152= 228 btu 3x152= 456 btu
80,000-228= 79,772 btu 80,000-456= 79,544 btu
79,772-79,544 = 228 btu
79,544/79,772 =0.9971418542847114 or 99.7%