DR rapid-fire splitter. Super split alternative?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

cwill

Member
Oct 13, 2010
182
W. MI
Rapid fire

Saw this in an ad. Looks like dr copied a super split.
 
TreePointer said:
I saw that a little bit ago.

SpeeCo just came out with their version, too!

SpeedPro Kinetic Log Splitter

$1700 for the SpeeCo. That's a great price. The 35ton is $1300 here, this one is well worth the extra.
 
velvetfoot said:
The SpeedPro supposedly goes vertical too?
How does that work out?

Beats me, I was wondering the same thing, hopefully someone can explain or maybe it is a typo?
 
I'm not sold. I watched those videos--though you can tell they're faster, the time trials/comparisons are clearly not run for maximum speed for each machine. Those guys were using the full throw on the hydraulic splitters every time--I barely use half. Also, why not show a 30" log? I just split a 30' maple that was 30" at its smallest--not sure those machines would work so well in that case.

S
 
I don't see myself dropping 30" diameter rounds onto either of those. If you have smaller diameter straight 4 to 6 way split stuff, $1700 for that kind of productivity seems like a nice package. I short stroke as much as possible but there is no way you are touching those cycle times even with quick popping stuff. Too match that kind of productivity you are looking at a 6 way wedge machine that you aren't going to touch for that kind of money.

That Speeco must be pretty new, it's not even on their website yet.
 
thinkxingu said:
I'm not sold. I watched those videos--though you can tell they're faster, the time trials/comparisons are clearly not run for maximum speed for each machine. Those guys were using the full throw on the hydraulic splitters every time--I barely use half.

S

True, plus they have a young buck running the SS clone and the guy running the hydraulic splitter looks like he is about 90.
 
The issue i have with all these kinetic splitters is your chasing the wood off the oposite end of where your working, bending over way more than you should have to, and that makes them slower.
 
I'm not so sure about the safety of kinetic splitters either. Is there a way to stop the ram mid-cycle? At least with a hydraulic you have some room for Oh S*&^ moments. I'd be double wary of running one with a partner.
 
peterc38 said:
True, plus they have a young buck running the SS clone and the guy running the hydraulic splitter looks like he is about 90.

You must have missed the part where they switch operators mid-way through to rule that out.

Pineburner said:
The issue i have with all these kinetic splitters is your chasing the wood off the oposite end of where your working, bending over way more than you should have to, and that makes them slower.

That's why most of them come with a work table. It's really no different than a hydraulic splitter with a stationary wedge.

MasterMech said:
I'm not so sure about the safety of kinetic splitters either. Is there a way to stop the ram mid-cycle? At least with a hydraulic you have some room for Oh S*&^ moments. I'd be double wary of running one with a partner.

Most of them can stop mid-cycle AFAIK. The issue is reaction time. Your reaction time with a hydraulic splitter may be 1 inch of ram movement, whereas your reaction time on these splitters is going to be 3-4 inches of ram movement.
 
That link to TSC and the Speeco video says it is temporarily unavailable...for whatever reason.
 
CountryBoy19 said:
peterc38 said:
True, plus they have a young buck running the SS clone and the guy running the hydraulic splitter looks like he is about 90.

You must have missed the part where they switch operators mid-way through to rule that out.


Ooopppss, I stand corrected, that is what I get for bein' too lazy to watch the whole thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.