My dealer's website indicates that they still have some 270s for sale, as well as the 280. When comparing the specs on the website, I note the following:
The 270 weighs 11.7#, develops 3.4 bhp, takes a .325 chain, and costs $439 with an 18" bar.
The 280 weighs 11.7#, develops, 3.6 bhp, takes the same chain as the 270, and costs $509 with an 18" bar.
It seems like a no-brainer to get the 270 for $70 less, for a reduction of only 0.2 in horsepower, if they are still available. What am I missing? Why pay $70 more for the 280?
P.S Yes, the displacement on the 280 is 54.7 (vs. 50.5 on the 270), but so what? Isn't the important number the bhp, not how much displacement it takes to produce the bhp?
The 270 weighs 11.7#, develops 3.4 bhp, takes a .325 chain, and costs $439 with an 18" bar.
The 280 weighs 11.7#, develops, 3.6 bhp, takes the same chain as the 270, and costs $509 with an 18" bar.
It seems like a no-brainer to get the 270 for $70 less, for a reduction of only 0.2 in horsepower, if they are still available. What am I missing? Why pay $70 more for the 280?
P.S Yes, the displacement on the 280 is 54.7 (vs. 50.5 on the 270), but so what? Isn't the important number the bhp, not how much displacement it takes to produce the bhp?