I'm just gonna ask

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

kmachn

Member
Oct 27, 2010
57
St. Louis, MO
I find myself lurking on hearth.com more and more each week, looking for answers for the hundreds of questions that pop into my head. I've reached the point where I'm just going to start asking the experts, all of you...

I've read a TON of posts on burn times on this forum. My wife and I work full time with 4 small children (5 years, 4 years, 2 years and 7 months) so I'm trying to get the best burn time out of my Cumberland Gap. I know the manufacturer overstates the burn times (I think 15 hours is grossly overstated in this case) but I am only semi-satisfied with with ~7 hours of burn time I'm getting. I'd like to stretch it to about 8-10 with more coals at the end...more coals at 8 hours would make me plenty happy. I installed a flue thermometer this year and it has helped serve as a good guide. I'd like to add a stove-top thermometer, but there is a 1/2-inch gap between the firebox top and the cast-iron top on my stove. With my IR gun, the cast iron top definitely seems to take longer to heat up. In fact, I think I may have overfired a bit last year waiting for it to get to 450-500 and quite frankly still wasn't getting good burn times, probably because of too much combustion initially. So, here are my questions (at least on this topic)

1) Should I remove the cast iron top and just place a thermometer directly on the steel firebox top? Would this be a more accurate measure? I looked at pics of the Isle Royale (since it's in the same Quad family and it's a popular stove on this forum) but it doesn't seem to have the same spacing. This gap is definitely vented, probably intentionally for some reason?

2) I'm wondering if maybe I am getting too much outgassing once the fire gets going, which may be why my times are not as long as I would like. I tried the "cigar burn" method that I read in other posts. It seems to work sometimes, but those flames go where they want and sometimes start catching all of it.

3) I don't think it's the problem, but it could be a slight problem with strong draft. I have 23 ft of class A chimney pipe, with 2 offsets/returns. I think all 30-degrees. The stove pipe also has 2-45's. Once I get it good and hot and nice secondaries, I can close it all the way down and usually still get decent flames from the bottom of the firebox. Not sure if this should be happening, or only getting the "dancing flames" at the top.

4) At what flue temp should I start shutting down the primary? It's my first year with the stove pipe thermometer (Condar) so I'm still experimenting with what works best. What flue temps should I expect for cruising?

5) Am I expecting too much from a 2.4 cu. ft. firebox? Are my expectations unrealistic? I'm not expecting to get the advertised 15 hour burn times, just hoping to make it manageable enough that after I get home from work (let's say 8-10 hours, minimum) I still have decent enough coals that I can easily reload and not have to overly-combust the new wood and lose a bunch of "mass" to get stove up to temp.
 
kmachn said:
I find myself lurking on hearth.com more and more each week, looking for answers for the hundreds of questions that pop into my head. I've reached the point where I'm just going to start asking the experts, all of you...

I've read a TON of posts on burn times on this forum. My wife and I work full time with 4 small children (5 years, 4 years, 2 years and 7 months) so I'm trying to get the best burn time out of my Cumberland Gap. I know the manufacturer overstates the burn times (I think 15 hours is grossly overstated in this case) but I am only semi-satisfied with with ~7 hours of burn time I'm getting. I'd like to stretch it to about 8-10 with more coals at the end...more coals at 8 hours would make me plenty happy. I installed a flue thermometer this year and it has helped serve as a good guide. I'd like to add a stove-top thermometer, but there is a 1/2-inch gap between the firebox top and the cast-iron top on my stove. With my IR gun, the cast iron top definitely seems to take longer to heat up. In fact, I think I may have overfired a bit last year waiting for it to get to 450-500 and quite frankly still wasn't getting good burn times, probably because of too much combustion initially. So, here are my questions (at least on this topic)

1) Should I remove the cast iron top and just place a thermometer directly on the steel firebox top? Would this be a more accurate measure? I looked at pics of the Isle Royale (since it's in the same Quad family and it's a popular stove on this forum) but it doesn't seem to have the same spacing. This gap is definitely vented, probably intentionally for some reason? I am not intimate with that stove but.... I would advise against such a drastic alteration. The gap is designed, I am guessing here, as a convection channel, as the air in the channel heats up, it rises and pulls cooler air into it, lather, rinse, repeate. Making a change will alter the way the stove is designed to work.

2) I'm wondering if maybe I am getting too much outgassing once the fire gets going, which may be why my times are not as long as I would like. I tried the "cigar burn" method that I read in other posts. It seems to work sometimes, but those flames go where they want and sometimes start catching all of it. One of the major factors to longer burn times is wood species. For example if I burn White Pine I can count on reloading in 4-5 hours, if I burn White Oak, I can easily get 8-10 hours with enough coals on reload. What type of wood are you burning?

3) I don't think it's the problem, but it could be a slight problem with strong draft. I have 23 ft of class A chimney pipe, with 2 offsets/returns. I think all 30-degrees. The stove pipe also has 2-45's. Once I get it good and hot and nice secondaries, I can close it all the way down and usually still get decent flames from the bottom of the firebox. Not sure if this should be happening, or only getting the "dancing flames" at the top. A flue damper may help with your situation here. They are not that expensive and may be well worth it for you. I have one, don't need it, but like to have it as insurance if the stove gets out of hand. A damper will slow your burn and limit the oxygen to the fire. By using one you MAY be able to extend your burns and not send so much heat up and out.


4) At what flue temp should I start shutting down the primary? It's my first year with the stove pipe thermometer (Condar) so I'm still experimenting with what works best. What flue temps should I expect for cruising? This is depends on your set up. I can speak to how I do it..... Open wide untill wood is charred pretty nicely, internal flue temps hit 600 then I cut her back 25-50 % depending on look of fire, stove temps start rising nicely, about 10 minutes later, flue temps usually near 800, I cut her back another 25-30 %, another 10 minutes, she is either closed completely, or just a smidge open, and by a smidge I mean a smidge. Depending on fuel being used, I am now cruising for quite a while..... maybe 8-10 hours (Oak) maybe 4-6 (Pine) or somewhere in between.


5) Am I expecting too much from a 2.4 cu. ft. firebox? Are my expectations unrealistic? I'm not expecting to get the advertised 15 hour burn times (good because they are never accurate IMHO), just hoping to make it manageable enough that after I get home from work (let's say 8-10 hours, minimum) I still have decent enough coals that I can easily reload and not have to overly-combust the new wood and lose a bunch of "mass" to get stove up to temp. I am not familiar with the stove so I will not say one way or the other.

Long burns really depend on stove, stove size, setup, and fuel. We know the stove and the setup but not the fuel. So..... are you burning Oak, or Silver Maple ? It makes a big difference.
 
With regards to moving the top piece, I wouldn't be cutting anything on the stove, it is a piece that is easily removed and easily replaced. I hear what you're saying about the convection channel. If I were more familiar with other stoves, I could probably better understand why it is different. I don't want to remove it permanently, just long enough to do some experimenting and see if measuring that surface is a good indication of burning temps. I'll try to take a pic this evening and post, maybe it'll help better give an indication and confirm what you said about the convective nature of the stove.

As far as the type of wood, I can't say for sure because I scrounge all of my wood and I'm still learning. I know there is some cherry, some oak and some punky stuff. I don't expect the long times out of the punky stuff, I have been using a mix of oak and other stuff with the ~6-7 hour burn times. I do know they are not pine or cedar. I don't know if they are any type of maple or not.

I thought about the pipe damper, thinking that as a last resort but wanted to throw the possibility of strong draft out there. I just installed an OAK this year, and seem to have pretty much the same results as last year (without the OAK) with regards to burn time. I'm wondering if trying some foil tape over ~10% of the intake of the OAK would help slow things down too. Just a temporary solution to trying something. We definitely have less air infiltration, so I love that part of having the OAK.

This is depends on your set up. I can speak to how I do it….. Open wide untill wood is charred pretty nicely, internal flue temps hit 600 then I cut her back 25-50 % depending on look of fire, stove temps start rising nicely, about 10 minutes later, flue temps usually near 800, I cut her back another 25-30 %, another 10 minutes, she is either closed completely, or just a smidge open, and by a smidge I mean a smidge. Depending on fuel being used, I am now cruising for quite a while….. maybe 8-10 hours (Oak) maybe 4-6 (Pine) or somewhere in between.

I haven't been letting it get quite that hot, but I am getting a clean burn (no smoke from chimney, good secondaries). I admit I sometimes cut it back a little too soon. I'll give the higher temps a try this evening. My concern with getting it up that hot at the flue thermometer is burning up a lot of wood and not having much left. But I definitely need to try something different than what I'm doing.

Any other information that would be helpful?
 
Thanks for calling me an expert, but I can really only address items 3 and 5.

For 3, I think most setups allow the primary air to be turned down all the way and pretty much eliminate flame from the bottom, leaving only the wispy blue secondary flame you mention. However, I also find that in my stove if I turn the primary air all the way down my secondaries soon peter out. This varies, but most of the time I don't use the lowest primary setting, so the question of how the lowest setting works would be just an academic discussion.

For 5, I think you're doing pretty well getting 8 to 10 hours out of a 2.4 cubic ft firebox.
 
Wood Duck said:
Thanks for calling me an expert, but I can really only address items 3 and 5.
Just the fact that there are "5" and you can address any of them says you're more of an expert than I. :)

For 3, I think most setups allow the primary air to be turned down all the way and pretty much eliminate flame from the bottom, leaving only the wispy blue secondary flame you mention. However, I also find that in my stove if I turn the primary air all the way down my secondaries soon peter out. This varies, but most of the time I don't use the lowest primary setting, so the question of how the lowest setting works would be just an academic discussion.
Thanks for the clarification. You have me wondering if maybe there is an air leak from the ash pan underneath. Even if there is, it would be very slight. Maybe I could try a short vid to show what I'm seeing, and you experts could tell me if it looks normal. Maybe I could try incense while the fire is going tonight to see if any air is being sucked through there?

For 5, I think you're doing pretty well getting 8 to 10 hours out of a 2.4 cubic ft firebox.
Just to clarify, I'm really only getting about 6-7 hours with a few coals. I'd like to be getting the 8-10 hours with a few more coals.
 
Being a fellow Gap owner I think your doing fine with the fuel you have.I can have a 8-10 hour burn with a full load of oak or osage that have been seasoned for years.Do you have the blower?We burned the first 6 month's without one and the stove did good.found a deal on the blower and the stove kicks alot more heat out.
 
Thanks for chiming in Jeff. Are you getting 8-10 hour burns with the blower on? I do not have one, but have really been considering it. At ~$200 though, I want to be sure it's going to serve it's purpose. I also have an OAK installed (just this year) and I'm not sure if the OAK will block the blower's installation. Do you have an OAK, and any problems with that? Also, how are you measuring yours getting up to temp? Do you use a stove-top thermometer, flue thermometer or just eyeball it through the glass?

So, here are a couple of pics with and without the cast-iron top.

I have a 3 vids also to show what I described regarding the burning at the bottom. It is happening pretty much even an hour after the primary has been closed all the way...it just won't go any further, so I'm thinking that maybe the Gap allows is still allowing a little air coming through the bottom and not just through the secondaries. I checked for air leaks along the ash pan and nothing.
 

Attachments

  • stove_w_top.jpg
    stove_w_top.jpg
    173.9 KB · Views: 632
  • gap_wo_top.jpg
    gap_wo_top.jpg
    132.8 KB · Views: 637
I don't own a Gap, but I thought I would chime in anyway - how about putting that magnetic stovetop thermometer on the face of the stove in the upper left or right corner. While it may not read as hot as on top of the stove, it would still give you a repeatable, reliable temp to go by and know how hot the stove is running. With a little experimentation of having that top plat off, using it to get a stovetop temp, and then moving it to the face you could fairly extrapolate your temps.

I also think that as you gain more experience with your wood i.d. and scrounging, seasoning, and such that you'll come across better fuel. If you can get a year or two ahead, that's when the benefits of seasoning really kick in. No doubt youve seen many posts here from the long timers who are always pretty far ahead with their wood.

To be fair it sounds like you are doing well for where you are with your fuel. I've always had cherry burn nicely for me, but I can't say I think of it as a fuel with a long burn time, and most of the cherry I've had over the years is always going to ash as opposed
to leaving nice glowing coals at the end of the burn cycle. Oak is always great stuff provided it has been CSS for long enough. Sure it will burn before two years, but the real benefit of oak only comes out after enough time in the woodpile.

Keep learning and experimenting and don't get too frustrated. It's all part of the learning curve, and getting there is half the fun. ;)
 
No oak,I think there is sufficient combustion air in this 1949 house.I do have an ir thermometer that I check with occasionally but mostly just eyeball.My draft is not the best(13' vertical 16' total) so that may slow my burn down.Like I said the stove did good without the blower but it cranks with it.
 
Jeeper - Thanks for the words of encouragement. That's a great idea about the stovetop thermometer on the face of the stove and comparing with the top and flue thermometer (my flue thermometer is a probe, so I'd have to pick up a magnetic one...good excuse to buy one now).

I am way ahead of where I was last year with my fuel. I thought I would be, but the first piece of evidence was when I used my wheelbarrow to haul it to the house...it was SO much lighter than last year! I try not to be too picky since I scrounge, and when I'm getting my wood my wife is usually alone with the 4 little ones. So I have to hussle or I can't get more next time. I would guess the wives in most wood-burning houses are pretty patient, but mine is exceptional! I try to keep my frustration level in check by reminding myself I'm learning and trying different things, but I can't do much about being away from the stove for that many hours d/t work, and I really want to make the stove work for me without having to do a cold start twice a day. A lot of great advice on this forum (obviously) but I often think I could be getting more out of my Gap. Not a lot more, just inching out the real beauty in burning in an EPA stove.

Jeff - Sounds like you don't need an OAK! I've done a lot of air sealing, so I just thought I'd go that route. The OAK kit from Quad was like $75, and when I went to do the install I only needed the outside vent, the flange, 4 screws and 2 plastic zip ties from the kit...flex duct was separate! Most of the kit was for the Millenium and other Quad stoves, so I took it back. I fashioned my own OAK with some 4-inch pipe and am getting great results. But, that is why I have been hesitant to purchase the blower. I'm almost wondering if it would be easier to buy something like an in-line duct fan mounted on the back and get the same effect. Although, I'm not sure if that would give the same effect.

I'm going to post the vids here (once I figure out how) and maybe I can get some feedback on if it looks a little excessive when it's closed down all the way or if everything looks right? The problem I have had with eyeballing as a newb is that I don't have a basis for comparison. That's why I really value the collective wisdom here.
 
Here is a video of my burn tonight that was ~13 minutes after cold start. Flue temp was ~400 F. This was the point that I turned it to 50% open.

 
Here is the video that was ~20 minutes after cold start, about 7 minutes after turning it from full open to 50%. Flue temp was ~600-625 F. This was the point that I turned it all the way to closed.

 
Here is the video that was ~1 hour after cold start, about 40 minutes after turning it from 50% open to fully closed. So, it had been fully closed for 40 minutes at this point. Flue temp was still ~600-625 F, cruising along. Does this look like the amount of secondaries and "primaries" (not sure if "primaries" is the right word, but the flames coming up from the bottom is what I'm referring to) for 40 minutes after the primary air control has been shut all the way down?



I should probably note to that the secondaries were gone by 2.5 hours from cold start, and just a small flame from the bottom...mostly just coaling at that point. Does that sound about like what I should expect?
 
Hi Kmachn. Just thought I would throw my latest experiences in. I have the Quadrafire Yosemite which is the little brother to the Gap, but with only a 1.5 cu. fireobox. I know what you mean about not being able to go by your stovetop thermometer. I've ran mine without the top on it and had steady temps of 600 to 625 which is about what your experiencing. With the top on, it is about 200 to 250 less and even lower when I stuck it on the front left corner.

My house is only 900 square ft. and built in 1952. I don't have my outside air hooked up and figure I don't really need it. I do have a Magnaflex Insulflex 6" liner in my old masonary chimney, 17 ft. length total, which I just installed this past summer with a block off plate which really made a difference in stove performance. My draft is good. I'm in the process of getting ahead on my wood supply a few years. What I've mostly been burning is red maple, willow and some locust which is just about a year seasoned out. I've bought a moisture meter but haven't tried it out yet.

I have been getting some good burn times the past few weeks. I've been working some 12 hour shifts and have still been having enough coals to get going when I get home without kindling. Not that my house isn't down to 67 or 68 degrees but the stove is still putting off some heat and is easily revived.

Something you didn't mention that you might want to try is let your ash pan fill up as well as the grate in the floor of the firebox. I tightned my ash pan latch some and just leave it shut, "per tips from this forum". This seems to help me a fair amount on burn times. Try leaving a fair amount of ashes in your stove as a practice.

Here's my routine when getting home from work. I first open the door out wide to cool for a few minutes while getting paper towels and bowl of water to clean the glass, with the help of the ash of course. At this time the coals start to revive. After cleaning the glass, I take a small whisk broom and sweep the ashes back from the front of the stove a bit, then take my metal dustpan and scoop up a pretty good scoop, shake it off some. Carefully carry it out to the bucket outside so I don't get a dust storm from dumping inside. I come back in and turn the dust pan over and rake the remaining coals and ash to the front, put about 3 splits in north to south and a few bigger pieces on top east to west. Then open up the startup air and primary air wideopen and leave the door cracked. Usually by the time I go in the kitchen and grab a drink and a snack it's started up and going again.

I'm not a pro by any means and have learned a bunch from lurking on this forum. Kudos guys!! ;-) I'm for sure a noob to the epa stove scene. I have burned the old Fisher smoke dragons for years and loved them but I now know there is a better and much cleaner way to go about it. The next wood you end up having may give you entirely different results which many times ends up being the culprit. You might dollar bill test both of your doors and tighten up the latches by swaping the washers around if needed.

I usually end up getting up once through the night to feed my stove after going to bed, when getting up to hit the bathroom. Wouldn't have to but more times then not I do. Which probably helps me get a longer burn throughout the next day. I do feel that keeping a fair amount of ashes in your stove helps as far as holding coals. They have a place to snugle up and stay alive. Sorry for the lengthy post. Hey, I'm liking my Quad. Hoping to get a new camera for Christmas. I'll post some pics later on. Your rig looks good. I like those vids. Stay warm!! :coolsmile:
 
I think the key to long burn times is related to several things. Type/size of split is crucial. Some cut their length to short. If you have room for a 20 inch split, you should cut a 20 inch split, IF you want long burn time. If you have six or seven 16 inch splits in a 20 inch firebox, you're effectively losing an entire split, or split and a half in the load.

The hardwood species listed on a btu chart are best, the oak, locust, hickory, and several other woods.

And one thing I always do is take a big old split or round and put it in the back of my oslo, then shove the other stuff in tight, putting as much in as I can, including little 2 inch rounds on top if space allows.

And of course, not shutting down the air soon enough will burn off the load quicker.

I'd disconnect that OAK if I were you just to experiment, maybe that's putting too much air into the firebox and burning the load off too quickly.
 
Well, last night's burned seemed to go pretty well. I let it get hotter (as suggested by shawneyboy) and I think that definitely helped. I still had a few coals this morning, and that was after 12 hours! It wasn't quite enough to easily start a fire, and they were hidden under the ashes, but nonetheless it was improvement!

embers - Thanks for chiming in. I was hoping I'd here from some Yosemite and/or Isle Royale burners, along with Gap burners. Glad to hear I haven't lost my mind on the stove top thing, I was really feeling like I was missing something. Sounds like you're doing awesome with the Yosemite, it'd be great if I could keep getting longer burns and get up like yours. I would be very pleased! Looking forward to seeing pics of your Quad!

I'll try leaving a little bit of ashes in there. Jags had made a similar post (helping someone with the Isle Royale) and what you describe in your routine, along with what he said, it does make sense to me to help have some coals left over. Maybe even slow down (without stopping) the primary air coming in when it is shut all the way down at high temps.

With regards to my wood, I have generally organized it by how dry it is when I get it (I usually only get dead trees) so I burn the driest stuff first. That's mostly what I'm working with now, which is why some of it is punky. I think the stuff I am getting now (for next year) I'll try to organize by species. That might help me get better with how each type of wood is burning.

ansehnlich1 - Most of mine are 18-20 inches. I have been trying to put a big split or round in the back of the firebox. I do think it helped last night, although previously it seemed to get engulfed in flames with the others. I think part of it may be the way I stuff my wood in there. If it's too tight, it never takes off but if it's too loose, it roars and burns off too quickly. I guess this is a big area for me to focus. Since I split with a maul though, I find the (sometimes) awkward shapes make it tough to get them to fit how I want them to fit.

You mentioned unhooking the OAK. Does it look to you (from the videos) that the flames are still a little too intense 1 hour into the burn?
 
I don't have your stove, so I have nothing to judge the flames by, whether they are too much at one hour into the burn. It was just a thought to disconnect the outside air and see what happens. It may slow down the burn some.
 
Like e.a. says,the ash pan on most stoves are over rated.I used one on another stove for 2 months and haven't used one since.It may not be the cause of short burns but you can eliminate that area(as far as air leaks) by letting it fill and just shoveling the ashes out.Glad to here you made it through work on one load.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.