(-: 2010 Pellet review its that time again! :-)

jtakeman Posted By jtakeman, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:28 PM

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jtakeman

    jtakeman
    Minister of Fire

    Dec 30, 2008
    13,496
    1,572
    Loc:
    Northwestern CT.
    I am trying to test brands I didn't test last season mostly. If I have time I might? Both the Greene Teams and Nature Own did well for me last season. It would be hard to tell the difference between them. I would have no issue purchasing either brand.

    Just a note:
    The Potomac's are about done. Hopefully finish them tomorrow and tally the numbers. Nice having my own scale this year.
     
  2. WoodPorn

    WoodPorn
    Minister of Fire

    Aug 24, 2009
    1,501
    219
    Loc:
    South of the beloved Patriots
    OK so here's the obvious; NEWP are crap! ...well last years are anyway. Nothing scientific here, just some temps. I ran a bag of last years NEWP through the englander last Friday and was getting 200 °F out of the convection grate, before the hopper was empty I filled it back up with Somersets and within 1 hr I had 261 °F !! That's with all the ash from NEWP's. Feed setting was at 5 for both bags.
     
  3. jtakeman

    jtakeman
    Minister of Fire

    Dec 30, 2008
    13,496
    1,572
    Loc:
    Northwestern CT.
    woodporn,

    What plant were the last seasons NEWP's from?
     
  4. Corny

    Corny
    Member

    Oct 17, 2010
    50
    2
    Loc:
    Ontario, Canada
    J-T, the rigour of your test protocol is impressive. :coolsmile:
     
    jjs777_fzr likes this.
  5. jtakeman

    jtakeman
    Minister of Fire

    Dec 30, 2008
    13,496
    1,572
    Loc:
    Northwestern CT.
    Thank you corny. :)
     
  6. WoodPorn

    WoodPorn
    Minister of Fire

    Aug 24, 2009
    1,501
    219
    Loc:
    South of the beloved Patriots
    Surprisingly enough, the Jaffrey plant.
     
  7. jtakeman

    jtakeman
    Minister of Fire

    Dec 30, 2008
    13,496
    1,572
    Loc:
    Northwestern CT.
    I still say the best pellet the NEWP marketed was the Green Supreme. Once they stopped selling them I stopped purchasing NEWP's. There hardwoods were about middle of the road goods and usually over priced due to the name?? Sure I am going to hear flack on this, But thats my opinion anyway.
     
  8. vvvv

    vvvv
    New Member

    Feb 23, 2010
    1,449
    0
    Loc:
    MAINE
    as the room gets warmer, the stove gets hotter. ashes block the front holes of the burnplate so the air is somewhat prevented from blowing around the pellet bed & has to blow more thru the pellet bed + 2 1/2" pellets burn hotter than 1 1" pellet
     
  9. tinkabranc

    tinkabranc
    Minister of Fire

    Oct 23, 2007
    1,643
    8
    Loc:
    South Coast MA
    X2- Green Supreme are the best of all the brands I have tried to date. I still have some leftover from last
    season. I also found a few brands this year that are comparable as a replacement but NEWP is not the mfr.
     
  10. Oilhater

    Oilhater
    Member

    Jul 30, 2009
    115
    0
    Loc:
    Southern NH
    If you want Green Supreme's just go find some Dragon Mountain's...right BTU?
     
  11. vvvv

    vvvv
    New Member

    Feb 23, 2010
    1,449
    0
    Loc:
    MAINE
    261*/200*= 1.3 so if the good pellets had 8500btu/lb then the bad pellets had 6538 btu/lb.....................imagine that!
     
  12. WoodPorn

    WoodPorn
    Minister of Fire

    Aug 24, 2009
    1,501
    219
    Loc:
    South of the beloved Patriots
    Pook this would be true if you WERE NOT using an OAK, however as the manufacturer suggests...I do!

    And as I said, I did not clean out the burn plate so there was less air/more restriction and probably crappier combustion....and they were still hotter by 60 °F .
     
  13. Trickyrick

    Trickyrick
    Feeling the Heat

    Oct 23, 2009
    285
    24
    Loc:
    Western MA/ Eastern NY
    Doesn't work that way and isn't that easy, the math is MUCH more complicated than that. The easiest thing to say is that the NEWPs are NOT as efficient as Sumersets undert hose conditions.
     
  14. vvvv

    vvvv
    New Member

    Feb 23, 2010
    1,449
    0
    Loc:
    MAINE
    i dont think air density is that critical from 200*-261*. please show me the math. whats a BOMB CALORIMETER?
     
  15. vvvv

    vvvv
    New Member

    Feb 23, 2010
    1,449
    0
    Loc:
    MAINE
    Oak uses outside air with temp & humidity factors, no OAK uses room air which is more evenly tempered to minimize the affect of those factors
     
  16. WoodPorn

    WoodPorn
    Minister of Fire

    Aug 24, 2009
    1,501
    219
    Loc:
    South of the beloved Patriots
    By the time the OA reaches the 400 or whatever degree exchanger I'd just about guarantee there are no humidity issues, and as far as the temp, there may be a negligible difference on the output of the heat exchanger, I'd venture a guess to state that the cold air your pulling into the house by not using an OAK is more noticeable.
     
  17. vvvv

    vvvv
    New Member

    Feb 23, 2010
    1,449
    0
    Loc:
    MAINE
    aint talking about the house, talking about the thermal evaluation of the pellets & standardizind the affective factors like a BOMB CALORIMETER does
     
  18. WoodPorn

    WoodPorn
    Minister of Fire

    Aug 24, 2009
    1,501
    219
    Loc:
    South of the beloved Patriots
    I don't think anyone knows what your talking about!
     
  19. jtakeman

    jtakeman
    Minister of Fire

    Dec 30, 2008
    13,496
    1,572
    Loc:
    Northwestern CT.
    Unfortunately, I do. A BOMB CALORIMETER is what Twinports labs uses to test pellets for the majority of the pellet manufacturer's and Pook doesn't except what we do as proper testing. He wants lab testing. But the BOMB CALORIMETER is over $20K and nobody here is got that kind of cash. :sick:

    Of coarse none of us ever said we were lab testing. Just trying to compare as best as possible. Starting with a clean stove and not using an OAK. Is what I have been doing. If anyone cares anymore?

    Pook you sure can muck up a thread!
     
  20. Taperbill

    Taperbill
    New Member

    Oct 19, 2010
    64
    0
    Loc:
    Pine City, MN
    Thanks for the great clarification. I was getting a headache.

    I appreciate the real world test.

    We cant afford Robby robots for our golf guide or bowling ball purchases..Pictures showing jars with comparable ash and other real world testing results are the ticket.

    The tech heads can bicker all they want..
    give the masses what they want..

    Cheap ,clean affordable ..heat.

    now about Indeck vs. Lumber jacks..and burn time vs heat output and stove feeding times
     
  21. vvvv

    vvvv
    New Member

    Feb 23, 2010
    1,449
    0
    Loc:
    MAINE
    just read WP's post which implied 6538btu/lb pellets! without spraying water on them.& i'm mucking?
     
  22. WoodPorn

    WoodPorn
    Minister of Fire

    Aug 24, 2009
    1,501
    219
    Loc:
    South of the beloved Patriots
    You need another hobby!
     
  23. vvvv

    vvvv
    New Member

    Feb 23, 2010
    1,449
    0
    Loc:
    MAINE
    Butt i like BSology!
     
  24. fidiro

    fidiro
    New Member

    Feb 24, 2010
    283
    0
    Loc:
    Central NJ
    Knock Knock
     
  25. jtakeman

    jtakeman
    Minister of Fire

    Dec 30, 2008
    13,496
    1,572
    Loc:
    Northwestern CT.
    Ok I'll play along!

    "Who's there?" :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page