1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
  1. Bacffin Feeling the Heat

    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. basod Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 11, 2009
    765 posts
    Mount Cheaha Alabama
    Yeah just post pics here, clear close up and one log at a time per pic
  3. cygnus Feeling the Heat

    joined: Oct 23, 2010
    292 posts
    Central, NJ
  4. Wood Duck Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 26, 2009
    3,764 posts
    Central PA
    I wouldn't count on identifying trees soley based on bark. Bark is variable and there are lots of trees with similar bark. It is a lot easier to learn trees the old fashioned way, by looking at bark, twigs, leaves, and if available the fruits or nuts of the tree. The overall shape and growth habit of the tree is also useful, but like the bark is variable and takes experience to use for identification.

    My suggestion is that leaves are the first thing to examine, twigs, second, bark third. If you can find leaves, twigs, and bark then you probably have a lock on the ID.

    I'd start by learning the trees in your neighborhood. You have to go one at a time, in my experience learning trees, shrubs, birds, etc. It is always tough at first then gets easier.
  5. cygnus Feeling the Heat

    joined: Oct 23, 2010
    292 posts
    Central, NJ
    I agree with wood duck here. Leaves are the biggest tell but all aspects of growth and appearance come together for a confident ID. The one thing that would be great for us is some pics and description of the wood on one of these sites. Color, grain pattern, heartwood/sap wood distinctions, etc. All these sites are run by tree huggers who take pics of live, standing trees. We need cut and split trees! I guess that's why we have The Hearth.
  6. TimJ Minister of Fire

    joined: Apr 10, 2012
    1,031 posts
    Southeast Indiana
    Also, don't just look at the one tree you want identified. Look at the entire wooded area. What are the prominent species ? are they evenly scattered ? By looking at the entire area you may be able to narrow your guesses down real quick.
  7. krex1010 Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 3, 2010
    661 posts
    southeast pa
    Wood duck is right, identifying by bark alone can be very difficult or impossible at times, geography, environment, stresses on individual trees, location of the bark on the tree, and just the individuality of each tree can make the bark of a species vary greatly . Some bark pics make for slam dunk id's and some not so much. But if inam curious about the bark or leaves of a tree, google it and look at the google images, for example google "white oak bark" and look at the image result, you will see dozens of pics of white oak bark. Really helps rule out or confirm you id.
  8. new_wood New Member

    joined: May 9, 2011
    57 posts
    Ohio
    I agree ....post a few pics on here. Everyone is eager and willing to help.
  9. Bacffin Feeling the Heat

    Thanks for all the reponses. It is obvious to me the learning curve is years of experience. I have started to post pics of a grapple (my first ever) load I just received to id this stuff. I have been using this site for id using leaves, but the grapple load does not have leaves. I will be calling on you folks again!

    Humble regards,
    Bruce
    http://www.oplin.org/tree/leaf/byleaf.html

Share This Page