Best pellet price Ever, Even I was Amazed $8.90 / Bag

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.
coalkirk said:
I don't burn pellets, I burn rice coal. But in Europe, they deliver bulk pellets in a truck that pumps them (via air) into bulk storage bins in your home, much like I do with my coal. Maybe some pressure on the industry to get with the european model on this. They've got to be much cheaper that way. Am I dreaming?

I saw this on a couple of web sites earlier this year. This is a great concept - if you have either the room for the storage tank, or a good dry method of transporting from the tank to the stove/furnace. Delivery is same concept as the old coal delivery - drive to customer's home, transfer pellets into the "pellet bin", and drive off. No stacking or carrying. I would think someone in the states would catch on to this concept soon enough as it eliminates the stacking and carrying of the material, making it more appealing to the masses.
 
mgambuzza said:
Delivery is same concept
as the old coal delivery - drive to customer's home, transfer pellets into the
"pellet bin", and drive off. No stacking or carrying. I would think someone
in the states would catch on to this concept soon enough ......

Someone has:


Nichols Hardware in Lyme, N.H., receives a delivery
of wood pellets to be used as fuel for its 150,000-Btu per-hour
wood pellet boiler. The building has been heated entirely
with biomass fuels for 30 years.


taken from here:
http://www.solartoday.org/2005/nov_dec05/wood_heating.htm
 

Attachments

  • i_Wood.jpg
    i_Wood.jpg
    13.2 KB · Views: 370
In some ways the Europeans are ahead of us in this regard, but they have tax credits to help with green technologies.

But I think that in addition to improving the local infrastructure, we have to add greater local production capacity (e.g. more local pellet mills). This might help in stabilizing prices a bit.
 
What we don't have is a "critical mass" of pellet burners in close proximity to make such a delivery system viable.
 
By the truck load in Europe, neat. I have scouted around in Bavaria in whatever stores I happen into and can't even find pellets for sale. Thats up in the alps in Southern Bavaria. They must have em somewhere but I have yet to see where. I have located several sources of rather good beer but then I have been around that area for nearlly 26 years and lived there for 4 of em. I guess my priorities are in line.
 
Using DOI's latest numbers, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_wfr_a_EPD2F_PRS_cpgal_w.htm Oil is actually averaging $2.42 in the Northeast with a swing from $2.24 in Maine to $2.77 in Wash DC......

Their are just too many variables in house size, age, layout, fuel availability, time, sweat equity, amount of beer consumed on any given day, etc to use the calculator comparisons as gospel truth. You can say the BTU cost doesn't lie, but it does sometimes.

/runs back to his hole now.
 
Kiddies, the picture and article I posted is
in New Hampshire, not Europe. I doubt that truck
you see in the picture only delivers to
that one location.
I'm sure this will be more widespread
in this Country as pellet use progresses.
 
GVA said:
coalkirk said:
I don't burn pellets, I burn rice coal. But in Europe, they deliver bulk pellets in a truck that pumps them (via air) into bulk storage bins in your home, much like I do with my coal. Maybe some pressure on the industry to get with the european model on this. They've got to be much cheaper that way. Am I dreaming?
New England Pellet delivers like that but not many people in the city would want a silo next to the house.

We put the Harman Pellet Boiler in our house this fall. I plan to put a bulk feed system in over the summer. Our stove shop also put in a silo, so we can start selling bulk pellets to people soon. No delivery truck for us (yet?), but NEWP seems to keep theirs pretty busy, and we would love to see more. Right now, because of equipment cost (those trucks aren't cheap!) it is not less expensive, but in the long run I think it could be... Plus you don't have to deal with all those plastic bags!
Europe is so far ahead of us when it comes to whole house heat, and bulk feed, it's not even funny! They have full government support (WE should be working on getting support- like funding the Renewable Energy Securities Act started by Charlie Bass (Prior R congressman-NH). Europe would also love to take our pellets! (sorry- there I go again...)
 
jimkelt said:
GVA said:
coalkirk said:
I don't burn pellets, I burn rice coal. But in Europe, they deliver bulk pellets in a truck that pumps them (via air) into bulk storage bins in your home, much like I do with my coal. Maybe some pressure on the industry to get with the european model on this. They've got to be much cheaper that way. Am I dreaming?
New England Pellet delivers like that but not many people in the city would want a silo next to the house.

We put the Harman Pellet Boiler in our house this fall. I plan to put a bulk feed system in over the summer. Our stove shop also put in a silo, so we can start selling bulk pellets to people soon. No delivery truck for us (yet?), but NEWP seems to keep theirs pretty busy, and we would love to see more. Right now, because of equipment cost (those trucks aren't cheap!) it is not less expensive, but in the long run I think it could be... Plus you don't have to deal with all those plastic bags!
Europe is so far ahead of us when it comes to whole house heat, and bulk feed, it's not even funny! They have full government support (WE should be working on getting support- like funding the Renewable Energy Securities Act started by Charlie Bass (Prior R congressman-NH). Europe would also love to take our pellets! (sorry- there I go again...)

How do you like your Harman pellet boiler? I'm in my fourth winter with the Harman VF3000 coal stoker boiler. It paid for itself mid-season last year. It provides all of my heating and domestic hot water for my home, saving me at least $2,000.00 in oil. It's the best home improvement I've ever made. I heated with a wood boiler for alot of years. Too much work for me now. This is so easy.
 
How do you like your Harman pellet boiler? I'm in my fourth winter with the Harman VF3000 coal stoker boiler. It paid for itself mid-season last year. It provides all of my heating and domestic hot water for my home, saving me at least $2,000.00 in oil. It's the best home improvement I've ever made. I heated with a wood boiler for alot of years. Too much work for me now. This is so easy.

I love the pellet boiler. I used to use a P68 and an oil boiler. The boiler is much quieter than oil boiler, is as easy to use and clean as the stoves (4+ ton so far this year and haven't had to empty ash pan yet), and has had no problem heating my house (~3200 sq. ft.). It easily keeps the water in the temp range I set. Accounts for the outdoor temp as well. We also use it to heat our hot water. Bye bye expensive propane! Looking to save about $1000- $1500 this year, but my house will be consistently warm this year, and looking at a payout of about 5-8 years. Had a power outage yesterday and it ran on generator with very little fuel consumption and no problem!
Only thing is an addition (~400 sq. ft.) we put on this summer we did a radiant floor heat. Which works well- a little too well... Haven't found a good way to control temps in there. Pump is supposed to stay on all the time but boy it gets warm fast. The plumber wants to sell me a mixing system for about a grand (parts only). I am just lowering the boiler temp for now...
Sounds like the stoker is treating you well. Harman makes some really solid units. :coolsmile:[
 
Jim,

There are lots of inexpensive mixing valves available for about $100.00. Check this site which has Taco tempering valves.

http://www.aimradiantheating.com/store/components.html

My wifes cousin uses radiant floor heat in an addition and he tempers the water to about 90 degrees. Works great. Too hot is not good for that type of heat. I use a tempering valve also because I heat with a water to air heat excahnger in my duct work. Most days, I'm sending 90 degree water through it also. When it gets colder, I adjust the water up to 100-120 degrees. I only keep my boiler at around 145 degrees.

Wow, 4 tons and you haven't emptied the ash bin yet! I'm jealous. That's the draw back with coal, lots of ash. I get a ash tub full with every 250# of coal. The advantage is of course, coal is alot cheaper than pellets. If Harman had come out with that pellet boiler four years ago, I would have strongly considered it.
 
NY Soapstone said:
GVA said:
GVA said:
My final push here is:
If I burn 4 ton a year at $250 a ton
and my neighbor burns 5 cord a year at $200 a cord where's the cost difference????????

ahh who care's??????????????????????

And finally It really doesn't matter guy's, to each his own....... RELAX......... :cheese:

NYS
Reread this.......
in the end there is no cost difference.
That's all I'm trying to say. ;-)

Apples and oranges. Two different users, two different houses, two different thermal profiles...

My point is that you openly criticized Craig's calculator, but you were not understanding it correctly. In the end, there is indeed a very real cost difference. An energy/cost balance on the fuel itself is much more relevant than anecdotal stories of who paid what where, but a lot of people don't like the result they see once they've laid down money to make an investment in one particular method and pellets now sell for $4.50/bag.

Of course it's been gone through on this forum time and time again and will never go away, because most pellet stove owners are not comfortable with the fact that cordwood is much cheaper per BTU than pellets. Rather than focusing on the ease of use they get for the higher cost, a fair tradeoff they made, the arguments ultimately end in these apples and oranges comparisons.

-Colin
Oh damn I hate to do this but now that football is done and I have time............
Colin....... The calculator is off...... I did a little crunching here and there tonight and research It turns out that the calculator is putting pellets in at about
5600 BTU's per pound.. :eek:hh:
Well since the average is anywhere between7800 and 8800 BTU per pound I'd say this is a bit misleading don't you?

Don't know if Craig made the calculator or not........ I don't really care....... But it is flawed............
So this throws out the comparison to oil or NG don't ya think?
What kind of wood are ya burning? I can check on the BTU's for you if you like :blank:
 
noooo, GVA! Dont "diss" the all-knowing, always-right fuel comparison calculator! So much basis is put on it to further folks arguments on how awful pellets are as a heat source, it couldnt possibly be wrong....right? Surely you must be doing SOMETHING wrong? I mean, you DO burn pellets in the first place, you techie, dontcha? ;-P
 
Driz said:
We needed a couple bags to tide us over the weekend till I feel like getting a truck load of corn so decided to have the wife go grab em at Agway since its next to where she works. Knowing Agways foolish prices I called and asked them yesterday. It was $8.90 / bag. She said they were premium pellets though and there is a discount for buying a ton.I wouldn't even let her tell me how much a ton was. Incredible. Another reason why I never buy anything at Agway. Now that Tractor supply is in town I can't wait to see them go on their face.

11 years ago my local Agway was charging $7 per bag when to going price was $3.25. The clerk even asked me if the price was correct!
 
Hey, Sams Club is getting into the act too. Wife just was in Sams and they were only 5.99, Unbelievable. I just went and bought a ton of bagged cleaned corn for $160. They can keep their wood pellets. I hope they find a nice dark warm place to stick ( store) them where they will plug up the corparate plumbing.
Thats just another reason why a multifuel stove is the way to go. The corn smells nice outside too.
 
HarryBack said:
noooo, GVA! Dont "diss" the all-knowing, always-right fuel comparison calculator! So much basis is put on it to further folks arguments on how awful pellets are as a heat source, it couldnt possibly be wrong....right? Surely you must be doing SOMETHING wrong? I mean, you DO burn pellets in the first place, you techie, dontcha? ;-P
Actually I have a secret...
I buy a cord of seasoned split hickory, Grind it into sawdust and then compress and run it through an old meat grinder my Grandma used to use........
I easily get 10,000 BTU's per pound. Because as someone said here you will never get the BTU's out of pellets that you get out of wood......... And here I thought wood pellets were wood.......:lol: :lol:
No in all seriousness, I can find BTU's for wood based on a cord but still waiting for some one to tell me what a cord weighs of any kind of wood..... Then the BTU #s will be even closer if not equal, even if the cost difference between pellets and wood is only $50....... Sorry Depending on where you live.....
Did you see In my other thread.......... 1 cord over 300 bucks. :zip:

Edit.... here's a link to a LOCAL source.......

http://www.mywoodenergy.com/2.html

Those price gougers.... ;-P :cheese: ;-P
 
Driz:
Where you at??? That's our price as of last August. Would you share where you're from?


Driz said:
Hey, Sams Club is getting into the act too. Wife just was in Sams and they were only 5.99, Unbelievable. I just went and bought a ton of bagged cleaned corn for $160. They can keep their wood pellets. I hope they find a nice dark warm place to stick ( store) them where they will plug up the corparate plumbing.
Thats just another reason why a multifuel stove is the way to go. The corn smells nice outside too.
 
GVA said:
NY Soapstone said:
Apples and oranges. Two different users, two different houses, two different thermal profiles...

My point is that you openly criticized Craig's calculator, but you were not understanding it correctly. In the end, there is indeed a very real cost difference. An energy/cost balance on the fuel itself is much more relevant than anecdotal stories of who paid what where, but a lot of people don't like the result they see once they've laid down money to make an investment in one particular method and pellets now sell for $4.50/bag.

Of course it's been gone through on this forum time and time again and will never go away, because most pellet stove owners are not comfortable with the fact that cordwood is much cheaper per BTU than pellets. Rather than focusing on the ease of use they get for the higher cost, a fair tradeoff they made, the arguments ultimately end in these apples and oranges comparisons.

-Colin
Oh damn I hate to do this but now that football is done and I have time............
Colin....... The calculator is off...... I did a little crunching here and there tonight and research It turns out that the calculator is putting pellets in at about
5600 BTU's per pound.. :eek:hh:
Well since the average is anywhere between7800 and 8800 BTU per pound I'd say this is a bit misleading don't you?

Don't know if Craig made the calculator or not........ I don't really care....... But it is flawed............
So this throws out the comparison to oil or NG don't ya think?
What kind of wood are ya burning? I can check on the BTU's for you if you like :blank:

Actually, you've made another mistake... but I can explain this one as well:)

You are neglecting to account for the efficiency factor in the calculator. Craig has a default of 70% for pellets and wood stoves. This helps correct the results relative to electric or high efficiency gas/oil heaters - it is a user parameter you can adjust to whatever you believe is correct. You'll see that the results page has the key statement "delivered into the home." Not "loaded into the heater." That is an important point, and in fact, it goes to show why you can't just compare the cost of the fuel source - you have to consider how efficient the repsective heaters are. The difference is really most significant for electric heat, although even at 100% efficiency, it still loses to almost everything in any scenario.

So to prove this, let's use an example...

$200/ton pellets and 70% efficiency gives you a result of $17.71 per million BTUs. Some simple math will rearrange this result to 5646 BTUs per pound, just as you found when you didn't account for efficiency.

Now if you want to decouple from the efficiency factor, and simply look at what number Craig has behind the scenes to feed the calculations, just set the efficiency to 100%. $200/ton pellets and 100% efficiency gives you a result of $12.40 per million BTUs. A little more simple math and you come out at 8065 BTUs/lb. This is the heat basis entering the calculator, consistent with your expectations above.

Basic message is that any heat source, wood or pellets, has a certain BTUs per lb, but not all those BTUs will end up warming your house, and the calculator gives you the capability to take that into account when comparing your options.

Ready to turn on that oil heat now? ;-)
 
GVA said:
No in all seriousness, I can find BTU's for wood based on a cord but still waiting for some one to tell me what a cord weighs of any kind of wood..... Then the BTU #s will be even closer if not equal, even if the cost difference between pellets and wood is only $50....... Sorry Depending on where you live.....
Did you see In my other thread.......... 1 cord over 300 bucks. :zip:

Edit.... here's a link to a LOCAL source.......

http://www.mywoodenergy.com/2.html

Those price gougers.... ;-P :cheese: ;-P

The numbers are pretty interesting... Missouri extension has a nice site on the topic.

A cord of seasoned hardwood can run about 4000 lbs, and contain about 25 million BTUs. (varies a bit by species...) So 7000 BTUs per lb. in this case. Now I know what you're thinking - "wow, pellets have 1000 more BTUs per lb!" Sounds great... except that here on the east coast, we pay about $75/ton for wood, instead of $250/ton for pellets. :-S

But for fun, we can run the numbers with $300/cord hardwood - as long as you use $8.90/bag pellets and see how that works out. Sure, neither is a real market value, but entertaining nonetheless... and I can assure you pellets aren't going to look too good in that comparison either :)
 
$200/ton pellets and 70% efficiency gives you a result of $17.71 per million BTUs. Some simple math will rearrange this result to 5646 BTUs per pound, just as you found when you didn't account for efficiency.

How exactly did you determine 70% efficiency? Unless you have tested all pellet stoves in multiple settings, with multiple fuels I think it is impossible to "Guess". This is where fuel cost calculators become worthless. They can be manipulated to agree to just about any argument. On the same note efficiencies for wood and oil (and any) system can be manipulated in the same way...
The calculator is for a homeowner to (as best he can) determine if a suggested source will be cost effective against his existing. When people use it in an argument of my fuel is better than your fuel it loses its value.

The Pellet Fuels Institute has averaged an 87% efficiency for pellet stoves. I bet they know more than any one person knows, as they have access to actual info on stoves, and manufacturers...[/quote]
 
coalkirk said:
Jim,

There are lots of inexpensive mixing valves available for about $100.00. Check this site which has Taco tempering valves.

http://www.aimradiantheating.com/store/components.html
Thanks for the link. I will look into it.
For clarification, I would like to say that there is a (single) mixing valve in place. However, it does not temper the water enough. I think it is because I keep the boiler at 160-165 so I get the amount of hot water I need.
Still love the boiler! Funny side note- Finally cold day here (0 F). When I opened the curtains the P68 popped on. Good to know it's there when I need it :)
 
Yes you have to look at is as BTU Input and BTU Output.
The Calculator factors in the Ef. and this is why you get the lower BTU

Just like Gas stoves and fireplaces.
You have BTU input and output.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.