BeGreen said:The BTU value is not based on burning it in the woodstove. it's the basic energy content of the particular wood. Secondary combustion affects the efficiency of the stove. That is - if you put a pound of wood in the stove to burn, how much of this is returned to the room and how much up the stack as unburnt gases, heat, moisture.
thechimneysweep said:Hey Rocky,
Here's the way I've always understood it. If a pound of wood at a given moisture content contains 7,000 btu's of potential heat energy and you burn it in a woodstove rated at 70% overall efficiency, 4,900 btus will be delivered to the room (70% of 7,000 btu), and the remaining 30% (2,100 btus) will either not be extracted during the combustion process, or lost up the flue.
If a given stove develops good secondary combustion, more heat will be extracted from the wood. To the extent that this additional heat is transferred to the room, a higher overall efficiency rating will result. This is one reason today's EPA approved secondary burners achieve higher heating efficiency scores than pre-EPA models.
Rockey said:BeGreen said:The BTU value is not based on burning it in the woodstove. it's the basic energy content of the particular wood. Secondary combustion affects the efficiency of the stove. That is - if you put a pound of wood in the stove to burn, how much of this is returned to the room and how much up the stack as unburnt gases, heat, moisture.
I understand. The BTU rating is the amount of energy in a given fuel. By definition a btu is the amount of energy needed to raise a pound of water 1 degree farenheit. Since a pound of wood (at a certain MC) has been given a BTU rating, does this include the amount of energy in the smoke it gives off also. I'm going to assume that the answer is yes.