1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
  1. iamdrumming New Member

    joined: Jan 4, 2012
    32 posts
    Windham NH
    So, I'm still battling issues with my stove shutting down unexpectedly.
    I'm confident I'll resaolve it eventually, but I'm sure something else will go wrong.
    I wish I kept my Vermont Castings wood stove.
    These pellet stoves are a pain in my A**!!
    WAY too may things to go wrong...
    With a wood stove:
    - No moving parts
    - Quiet
    - Runs without power
    - There's a ton of FREE wood all over the place
    - I love chopping it

    Other than the convenience of a pellet stove running off a thermostat (which I don't use anyway), I don;t see a big advantage.
    Cleaner.. maybe.
    Just wondering if anyone else felt/feels the same way?

    Venting in NH...

    Thanks,
    Rob
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. smoke show Minister of Fire

    joined: Apr 17, 2008
    4,612 posts
    Pittsfield, Wi
    I can't believe you switched.
  3. Bkins Feeling the Heat

    joined: Mar 16, 2009
    351 posts
    Jersey Shore
    There are lots of reasons for each one and it is up to each of us to decide which works best. I don't know what brand/model stove you own or what you have done to try to get your problems rectified.

    Give the experts on this forum a chance to help you out. If you bought a clunker then its not a pellets stoves fault per-say.

    I heated with wood for 30 years prior to going the pellet stove route and unless I have someone cutting stacking restacking etc for free. I will never go back. Just not having to deal with the almost daily ash removal and overall dirt from a wood stove is priceless to me. Ya, it does cost more money if you can get or have been getting your wood for free. Add in the time to go fetch, cut, transport, stack, and usually move again is a deal killer for me looking back at things. Let alone the expense of a wood splitter, chainsaws, special clothing, axes and wedges.
  4. bbfarm Feeling the Heat

    joined: Jan 2, 2012
    330 posts
    wisconsin
    no, not at all.

    We could not run a wood stove while not home.

    We would have to dedicate a lot of weekends to getting, chopping and stacking wood.

    the mess, wood, insects dirt, bark dragged in the house

    we have the ability to regulate the heat on a thermostat

    --------------------------------
  5. oldmountvernon Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 27, 2011
    2,157 posts
    SE Mass
    NO WAY when i bought this place there was about 10 cords of wood in logs gave it all away and im surrounded by woods. And from the first day i said no way i hell am i burning wood. considered a outdoor boiler. but didnt even want that labor. I was schocked at how much heat a pellet stove produced and even surprised my stubborness gave in to try one but i am very happy so far. The only thing i fear is pellet pricing soaring since so many are switching thats why im hoarding :)
  6. saladdin Member

    joined: Dec 29, 2011
    224 posts
    West Tennessee
    I'm 37 and will not age very well. I had wood as a kid, I know the work involved. NO way will I do wood.
  7. mfglickman Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 17, 2012
    652 posts
    NW CT
    I am a newbie to both but we are splitting the difference and going with pellets in the room that will keep the furnace from turning on (oil fired set at 57 to avoid pipe freezes/provide backup if needed) and then putting a used Fireview into our family room for comfort in the room we spend most of our time in. I think both have their positives and drawbacks...it was important to my husband to have a heat source that doesn't require electricity and I guess I'll be glad to have that too. I like how easy the pellet stove is though, set it and forget it for a few hours...
  8. PJPellet Combustion Analyzer

    joined: Sep 6, 2011
    527 posts
    Western NY
    Heck no. I prefer my pellet stove. Yes there are more things to go wrong but everything is a trade off. IMHO both wood stoves and pellet stoves are a great way to heat. But I just love the time saving convenience of the pellet stove.
  9. I agree with ya 100%. The only advantage that pellet stoves have is you only have to load them once a day Vs. an avg. wood stove you need to load two to three times a day. Wood stoves will work with no power and tend to have a lot less headaches and maintenance issues. However pellet stove can offer venting solutions for people that may not be able to vent a wood stove were they need the heat. So they do have their place.
    Cory
  10. jtakeman Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 30, 2008
    12,726 posts
    Northwestern CT.
    I too am surprised you switched! I have both but use the pellet for my primary. My wood eater is only for back up(mostly power outages).

    Love my pellet eater. Fill it once every 3 days. Clean it once every week or 2 if I'm lazy. Keep more than enough supply on hand for more than a season without taking up the whole yard/garage/basement to do it. I don't need to keep 2 to 3 seasons ahead for seasoning properly! It runs off a stat so the house is the temp I want it and stays consistent! I can go on and on!

    IMHO a pellet stove wins hands down for me, But its where your heart is!
  11. yooper81 New Member

    joined: Jan 17, 2012
    80 posts
    U.P Michigan
    I to could list all the "cons" of wood vs. pellets, but the biggest one for me was the ease of installing, such as hearth requirements, venting, location, and insurance hurdles...... I have an all electric home also, so any wood burning stove has to be freestanding without any major remodels such as forced air, and I have to believe my quad does a far better job than a "maintenance" free wood stove can..... IMO
  12. briggsy13 New Member

    joined: Sep 19, 2011
    99 posts
    Maryland
    After getting to my parents house a week or so ago and the fire had gone out while they were at church and had to get it going again and wait for it to start putting out heat, no I wouldn't. I grew up with a wood stove as the only source of heat. My memories consist of either hot or cold. I do love the heat they can crank out but don't like not being able to control it as much. If I could have both that would be my answer.
  13. bostonfan49 Member

    joined: Nov 10, 2011
    249 posts
    Essex Jct. Vermont
    Someone, hit this man with a bag of pellets!,
  14. ironpony Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 22, 2010
    1,396 posts
    mid-ohio
    I did go with a wood stove......................

    it burns tiny little logs called

    PELLETS
  15. St_Earl Minister of Fire

    nope.
  16. vhmtach40 New Member

    joined: Jan 31, 2012
    1 posts
    Out in NW NM
    This is my first winter using my pellet stove ..been burning wood for 21 years ..I'm 43 years old and all the labor involved with wood burning is not all that appealing anymore ...with all the equipment maintenance and vehicle depreciation with fuel costs and hauling wood considerable distances .....burning pellets is way cleaner than wood...I'm glad I switched now my house is comfortable and warm ...besides I would like to save my time and energy to do other enjoyable things in life..... just my thoughts.
  17. yooper81 New Member

    joined: Jan 17, 2012
    80 posts
    U.P Michigan
    are pellets any cheaper in say, July. Wasn't really paying attention to prices last summer as I was "stove-less" at the time.
  18. jtakeman Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 30, 2008
    12,726 posts
    Northwestern CT.
    Hoarding? Now that's an understatement! ;-)
  19. DexterDay Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 11, 2010
    9,058 posts
    NE Ohio
    I have both.... Wood and Pellet..

    Have to keep 2-3 yrs worth of wood to have it seasoned properly (below 20%) which takes up a bit of space. Where my 10 ton (2-3 yrs worth) takes up less space than 3 cord of wood.

    Pellets provide very even heat (pellet furnace makes heat completely even throughout) and depending on Hopper size, you only fill once a day. A woodstove not only needs 2 to 10 loads (firebox size) a day, but you must watch the stove while its heating up and shutting down the air in stages, until you get to "cruising" temp (watching you dont overfire).

    Having both, if I had to choose... Pellets win hands down. I spent about $4,000 a yr on LP. So $800 in pellets (Max per yr), is well worth it to me.
    No seasoning time.
    Auto ignition.
    Thermostat.
    Even temps.
    Takes some maintenance, but 20-30 min a week isnt much compared to my total time cutting back the air on the woodstove (add time for whole week). Also, add all your time Cuttin/Splittin/Stackin wood and its gonna be way less than your cleaning times. IMO

    Wood heat is nice. I keep a Fire going constantly. Has saved me a ton of pellets this year (literally), but I would stick with my pellet stove if given the ultimate choice.

    Everyones lifestyle is different. Everyones needs are different.

    What stove do you have??? Adding it to your Signature line is helpful. Hope you get it figured. A well working pellet stove is hard to beat. Is it sized right to your home? Centrally placed so it heats efficiently?
  20. lbcynya Feeling the Heat

    joined: Oct 26, 2006
    394 posts
    W Michigan
    I have both as well. Pellets downstairs, cord wood upstairs. The best answer for me is both. That way I'm not beholden to any one of the 3 fuel forms I can use to provide heat. Cord wood being plentiful and as free as free can be nowadays. If I had to buy wood, then pellets would be the only wood I'd buy.

    Both have their own inconveniences, but pellets win for the ability to control with a thermostat.
  21. slls Minister of Fire

    joined: Jun 9, 2008
    1,317 posts
    central maine
    A wood stove is no match, for a GOOD pellet stove.
  22. Xena Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 30, 2005
    2,436 posts
    South Shore MA
    Nope.
    No desire to spend all summer collecting, chopping and stacking.
    Nor do I have the proper tools/vehicle to do so. I'm mechanically
    inclined so the pellet stove is easy for me to maintain.
    In the seven yrs I've had it there have only been a couple
    of small issues and I fixed them myself.
    Wood burning friend of mine is leaning towards converting to a pellet stove
    after his wife has been bugging him to stop by and check out mine. :coolsmirk:
  23. iamdrumming New Member

    joined: Jan 4, 2012
    32 posts
    Windham NH
    I have a Quad Castille insert. It was my old house that had the wood stove. So, I didn't actually convert.
    Its really just my frustration with this one issue that is cauing me to second guess myself.
    A lot of people on here have offered advice and I'm still working through those troubleshooting steps. Thanks again.
    Once its resolved, hopefully I'll feel better (and warmer!).

    I'm 44 and in decent shape for now. I do actually enjoy playing with wood (insert jokes here!) chopping, stacking, hauling, etc.
    So, the work is not a problem...
    I appreciate the feedback!

    Rob
  24. BrotherBart He Who Moderates

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    21,949 posts
    Northern Virginia
    Time for a group hug. :coolsmirk:
  25. Weird tolkienish figure Member

    joined: Jan 15, 2012
    171 posts
    Ma
    If you have a big lot with lots of trees then go with wood. Just beware that wood piles attract rodents.

    Otherwise I'm pretty happy with pellets. Convenience thing, and the thermostat option is just so nice. Don't see how you could replicate that on a wood stove.

Share This Page