Firebrick replacement for Waterford Stanley wood cookstoves?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Juanita

New Member
Feb 5, 2011
2
Libby, MT
I have a cast iron Waterford STanley wood cookstove. It has been a joy to use, but it turns out that the firebox liners are made of cast iron backed by rockwool. After my first year of heavy use (I have had the stove for about 5 yrs.), the firebox liners are warped and need to be replaced. Aside from the problem that I can't get them out because of the warping, they are very expensive. It would cost about $500 to replace the sides and back. I would like to replace them with firebrick. Has anyone tried this? Do they stay in place? I am assuming that the 1 1/4" thick firebricks would be adequate, though I dont' know what is the temperature in the firebox during a hot fire which makes the flue thermometer read 400 deg. F prior to damping. Does anyone have any thoughts about this? Thanks from the frontier of NW MT. I should add that the l. side firebox liner, which faces the outside of the stove (rather than the oven) has several holes drilled in it near the top. I don't know the function of these holes.
 
I have the wood burning kit and am burning wood, mostly larch, fir and lodgepole. It is hard for me to imagine that there is not adequate air coming in through the circular vent below the firebox. I can try asking the Waterford folks and at Lehmans (again) for the function of the holes. THanks for your reply. Juanita
 
The side and rear liners in the fire box of my stanley wood burner burned out years ago and were replaced with firebrick. This was quite a while ago and the brick has held up well. As I recollect I fastened the half thickness firebricks to 1/4" steel backing plates with 1/4" socket head cap screws countersunk into the firebrick. This sounds complicated but in practice it was easy to figure out and the end product worked well. I cut the brick to size with a masonry blade in a skil saw. I did not try to duplicate the holes in the left side.

This stove lost its air tight property years ago but I still like it because it heats up rapidly when I want coffee early in the morning.
As I recollect I got it in 1978.

Douglas
 
I'm in the process of completely rebuilding a small wood fired cook stove that was at its end of life when I got it for nothing. This thread interested me because the cast iron fire box parts are mostly either gone or junk. While the outside porcelain pieces are in good shape, the interior sheet metal parts are burned through. After I 'tin knock' those out of 16 or 18 gauge (which is what it was), I plan to use castable refractory cement to line the firebox. This is used in kilns where temps reach 2600 degrees so I can't see how it would not be suitable for this use. Also, it negates the seams that have to be filled when using fire brick. Rutland among others makes it.


http://www.google.com/products/cata...a=X&ei=EFIsTpOxLsOEtgeTqKTXAg&ved=0CEAQ8wIwAA
 
Great project. It's good to hear you are reviving the stove. Hope you are taking pictures of the step by step process.
 
Yep, taking pictures as I go, but I'll eliminate the ones with the bloody fingers from working with the sheet metal. ha ha ha. Sure wish I had a buddy with a brake. :) But then it wouldn't be fun!
 
It took me a few years working with sheet metal to learn how to cut and handle it without creating fishhooks that cut like razors. For brake work I take it to a local sheetmetal shop. Once I got to know them they would sometimes let me use the small brake for free if it was a quickie job.
 
Juanita said:
I have the wood burning kit and am burning wood, mostly larch, fir and lodgepole. It is hard for me to imagine that there is not adequate air coming in through the circular vent below the firebox. I can try asking the Waterford folks and at Lehmans (again) for the function of the holes. THanks for your reply. Juanita

Easy (here) to imagine that they've made provision for secondary air in some fashion, which helps greatly for complete combustion. Otherwise, they'd have great difficulty meeting emissions limits with thermal efficiency worth more than spit.

Still can't understand why any stove mfg would bother with any sort of metal liner. Almost transparent to IR, so it doesn't help to keep firebox temps up, and much more readily burnt through than firebrick. (Hot firebox -> complete combustion.)

Before you sink lots of time/effort/$ into restoring this stove, you might look into a current "EPA" stove. One that comes with a refractory liner, like firebrick. If you do decide to restore it, I'd suggest you request guidance from mfg or someone who understands how the stove functions, or should. No offense, but it sounds like you're kind of "at sea" there. Maybe someone local can advise.
 
Hmmm. Good to see this (sure it's a 3-year old thread, but...). I have choked on the price and never in-stock-ness of new liners for my Waterford Stanley, which a renter at my sister's overfired, warping most of the liners. Then again, the cast-iron liners may simply not be all that great. New gaskets are easy, but I had been thinking I'd have to fab new liners from boilerplate. Firebrick or castable will be a much easier solution. I have the manuals, so I can shed light on the secondary air question. All the air (with gaskets in good shape - gaskets not in good shape is one way to overfire it) is supposed to come in the spinwheel on the ash door, and the secondary air fraction of it is supposed to go up the left side and out the holes on top of the baffle. I'll put channels on the backside of the brick, or stainless tubes, or something like that. It's even possible (been a while since I was last trying to deal with it) that the left one might be more-or-less OK (perhaps from the secondary air keeping it a bit cooler.) Nope - found my old notes, and it's among the warped.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.