1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
  1. tymbee New Member

    joined: Dec 2, 2011
    55 posts
    Upstate NY
    If you were wealthy enough to be able to easily afford all the fuel oil, gas, or electric you could possibly consume-- would you still mess around with firewood?
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. jeff_t Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 14, 2008
    2,695 posts
    SE MI
    Yep. I would need something to do. It would be a lot easier, though, and involve some heavy equipment ;)
  3. CHeath Member

    I'm 40 years old but my dad always and still does burn wood. Just in the last few months I've started really looking for ways to cut back and I figured that running a stove would ease our $200 a month power bill. This is not much compared to many but if I could cut it in half by just burning wood then I'd be happy. Now if it cut it $30 ill be pissed. That said, if I was rich, I'd go flip the heat on. Maybe ill get used to it once I get ahead on wood but right now it's killing me trying to keep the damp, green wood going.
  4. nate379 Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 21, 2010
    4,010 posts
    Palmer, Alaska
    Hell no! I'd be sipping rum on a white sandy beach instead!
  5. BrotherBart He Who Moderates

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    21,960 posts
    Northern Virginia
    The stoves would be at the scrap yard in a heartbeat.
  6. fossil Super Moderator

    joined: Sep 30, 2007
    9,158 posts
    Bend, Oregon
    I'm certainly not wealthy enough to afford all the fuel oil, gas, or electric I could possibly consume. (that's what you asked). But I certainly am wealthy enough to afford all that I would ever need to consume. I still enjoy "messing around" with firewood. Rick
  7. DexterDay Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 11, 2010
    9,063 posts
    NE Ohio
    This is a perfect statement. I don't NEED to. Yet I do. I save money, have a hobby, and show my children a little hard work In between.
  8. lopiliberty Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 7, 2011
    565 posts
    Mineral County, WV
    Yes I would. Nothing can beat wood heat==c Its cruising away downstairs at 750 and the heat feels so good on a cold windy night. Wouldn't give it up for NOTHING!!
    Scotty Overkill and webby3650 like this.
  9. Hearth Mistress Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 24, 2012
    583 posts
    Point Pleasant, PA (SE PA)
    The money I save on oil, using wood instead, makes me rich in other aspects of my life ;)
  10. Joful Minister of Fire

    joined: Mar 7, 2012
    2,662 posts
    Philadelphia
    I'm pretty sure I've managed to spend much more on heating with wood, than I've saved in oil, my first two seasons in this house. No plans to stop now, though. :lol:
  11. BrowningBAR Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 22, 2008
    7,103 posts
    Doylestown, PA
    No matter how much money you had, the power would still go out. Generators can die.

    So, yeah, I'd still have a stove or three. I'd just use a chit load less firewood.

    At this point, though, with the challenges I am facing, I am seriously looking at a pellet add-on furnace to keep an even heat throughout the house and use the stoves to boost the temps to my liking. But, we'll see what the next 4-5 years of insulation offers in terms of limiting the massive heat loss I am dealing with.
    BrianK likes this.
  12. TheMightyMoe Feeling the Heat

    joined: Aug 2, 2012
    420 posts
    Fairbanks, Alaska.
    I would have a never ending fire moat around my castle.
  13. begreen Super Moderator

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    36,133 posts
    South Puget Sound, WA
    I would probably be living in warmer climes, but would still have a wood stove.
    dafattkidd and Hiram Maxim like this.
  14. ArsenalDon Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 16, 2012
    611 posts
    Meadow Valley, CA
    Might have wood delivered instead of going out there myself.....probably would not heat 100% with just wood..but how can you beat a good fire, look at my avatar.....how can you beat that?
    BrianK likes this.
  15. MasterMech Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 2, 2011
    4,809 posts
    Hudson Valley NY
    Says the guy posting pictures of flowers blooming on March 3rd. :rolleyes: ;)

    Tough call, but it would be hard to justify all these saws and a splitter to the wife if I was burning wood "recreationally".
  16. ewdudley Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 17, 2009
    1,182 posts
    Cayuga County NY
    You bet I would if it would deprive the government of one dime of taxes.
  17. billb3 Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 14, 2007
    3,069 posts
    SE Mass
    I'm sure I'd have a small fireplace of some sort to burn olive wood in Kassiopi Corfu.
  18. Val New Member

    joined: Mar 17, 2012
    86 posts
    yes. because other fuels have their good points and bad points too. I like the type of heat that comes from wood-not as hot/searing of a flame as gas. However, if I had a lot of money I would use a lot more electric heat, especially 220 volt, because it is clean, instant and efficient. However, the electric rates where I live are high. New York State slaps the consumer with taxes and tariffs on top of usage too.
  19. MasterMech Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 2, 2011
    4,809 posts
    Hudson Valley NY
    Where are you? I'm Ulster county (NYSEG) and we pay around $0.11/kwH for peak electric. $0.09 for off-peak.
  20. drifter1170 New Member

    joined: Feb 21, 2013
    9 posts
    I live on the big island of Hawaii can go to the beech any time I wont bought a house on manua loa at 2700 feet so I could burn could not imagine not having a wood stove
  21. rkshed Member

    joined: Jan 15, 2012
    229 posts
    Bedford NH
    Absolutely!
    I'd pick up a few hundred acres up north with an old farm on it and work the land, cutting wood and happily taking care of myself and my family.
    Ahhh, one can dream.
  22. Foragefarmer Member

    joined: Jan 14, 2013
    107 posts
    Central, Virginia
    I do this already and it is a lot of work. 294 acres of full time vacation; yeah right.

    If you own a big piece of property I have concluded that you need at least the purchase price of the property set aside in investments for the upkeep and maintenance of that property over and above what you need for living expenses.
    Valhalla likes this.
  23. tekguy Burning Hunk

    joined: Nov 12, 2009
    119 posts
    west mass
    the log cabin would have one hell of a fireplace with a big ole stone hearth
    Billybonfire and Scotty Overkill like this.
  24. Mackj New Member

    joined: Nov 25, 2012
    34 posts
    Fruitport MI
    I think so too! I would have a huge property in the middle of nowhere and all the toys! At this point I am very interested in masonary heaters. I would very much like to build one in the future. I have a friend in Pa with one, very cool. I would never be bored just hunt, fish, cut wood etc. Actually thats pretty much what I do in the winter now, and plow snow.
  25. Jack Straw Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 22, 2008
    2,017 posts
    Schoharie County, N Y
    That is my exact plan if I ever win the lottery, I hardly ever play the lottery though.

Share This Page