Monitoring, versus controlling

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

MrEd

Feeling the Heat
May 9, 2008
426
Rural New England
If my goal was to monitor my system (by reporting temps and tracking when things are running or not), as opposed to controlling it, what would be the easiest/quickest/cost effective way of doing this?

At its simplest, how can I get say 1/2 to a full dozen temps into my windows PC in near real-time? I work from home, my PC is running all the time (and I have remote access to it when I am not here), so if all I want to know is which parts of my system are at what temp, would my strategy be different that if I wanted to know all the temps and then make control decisions based on them?

As I head into my second season (first with storage), I'd like to add monitoring capabilities and then *maybe* add the computer-control logic in the next phase (year 3).
 
1-wire without a doubt. $30 for the usb adapter, a few bucks for each temp sensor, and free software to read the temps. 1-wire viewer is available free from the
Maxim website. If you want to log the data to a flat file/sql database there are a few free options. If you want "pre-built" sensors check out Hobby Boards @
http://www.hobby-boards.com

1-wire viewer http://www.maxim-ic.com/products/ibutton/software/1wire/OneWireViewer.cfm

You can save a pile of money by soldering up the sensors yourself.

Kris
 
Status
Not open for further replies.