You or he is welcome to their oppinions I gave mine. I am limited to looking at a few small pictures The information concerning "The charring is often referred to as pyrophoric carbon," Is factual and documented. Not something I made up. This condition is explained and actual investigations have proved this information or the contributing factor to a fire or fires have been enhanced by this process This is not a new find but this knowledge has existed for 100 years. Are all the investigators and scientist full of beans? What Phd does this guy posess? What is his credentials? Is he an MIT grad? Has this expert actually seen your setup? What does your local inspector say? Remember this is my oppinion based of limited view of pictures you supplied. Not from an actual inspection. I can be wrong. So Iam full of sh** for alering you of potential dangers or I might have said what you or he did not want to hear. I did this as a service to you. I did it in a professional manner. I did not call anybody names or extend inuendo to that extent. You e-mailed me for my oppinion that's what I gave. In this world it is ok to have different oppinions, personal attacks have nothing to do with the oppinion. That guy you claim is a Pro, Nothing professional about his response. Sure makes me want to side with his oppinions. Makes me wonder what course he took at MIT, to express himself so eleoquently?