RE: Point and shoot camera

firefighterjake Posted By firefighterjake, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM

  1. firefighterjake

    firefighterjake
    Minister of Fire

    Jul 22, 2008
    17,138
    3,582
    Loc:
    Unity/Bangor, Maine
    I've got a decent SLR digital camera . . . but for an upcoming cruise I was thinking about purchasing a decent Point and Shoot camera that I could easily drop into my pocket.

    I want something to take decent photos and be around for the long term. Suggestions?
     
  2. jeromehdmc

    jeromehdmc
    Member

    Mar 1, 2009
    210
    28
    Loc:
    Kansas City
    I've got a little Cannon PowerShot A720IS. It's probably 5 years old but It has lasted great. It's bounced around in the tourpak of the bike, been dropped and still takes good pictures. I did get a good memory card last year and I think it made a difference. I would definitely buy another Cannon when this one bites the dust.
     
  3. smokinj

    smokinj
    Minister of Fire

    Aug 11, 2008
    15,981
    1,412
    Loc:
    Anderson, Indiana
    Sony cyber shots.
     
  4. Retired Guy

    Retired Guy
    Minister of Fire

    Oct 27, 2011
    502
    132
    Loc:
    Cape Vincent, NY
  5. begreen

    begreen
    Mooderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    61,001
    7,743
    Loc:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    There are lots of good point and shoot cameras out there. It just depends on what features are important to you. Here are some of the things that are important to me: camera raw out option so that I can post process, AA batteries instead of a proprietary battery (chargers are more stuff to lug and keep track of), a viewfinder in addition to the LED screen. A lot of these cameras are going to LED screens only. They are hard to see in bright sunlight and impossible to see if you wear polaroid lens sunglasses. Other good camera features are a decent wide angle at the shortest focal length, CMOS sensor for low noise in low light, minimal distortion and aberration, minimal delay when taking a picture, good battery life, and of course ease of use. I also like a swivel LCD screen for when you can't just point the camera, but that's not a necessity. For these reasons I have owned Canon cameras. Others are catching up, but Canon continues to set the bar.

    If you haven't visited this site, check it out for more reviews then you can imagine:

    www.dpreview.com

    Here are their top 5 compact camera picks:

    http://www.dpreview.com/articles/6698413448/dpreview-recommends-top-5-compact-cameras

    FWIW, a buddy has a Canon S100 (now the S110) that I have tried and I have to say it's pictures are quite impressive, especially from such a tiny package.
     
  6. Gary_602z

    Gary_602z
    Minister of Fire

    Oct 30, 2009
    930
    288
    Loc:
    Lake Odessa,MI
    I second begreen on dpreview! They are the Hearth,com of the camera world.:) Also for the AA get some good rechargeable batteries.

    Gary
     
  7. firefighterjake

    firefighterjake
    Minister of Fire

    Jul 22, 2008
    17,138
    3,582
    Loc:
    Unity/Bangor, Maine
    Good site . . . I was thinking of not paying quite so much though for what will be my "secondary" camera . . . more of a camera to take some quick (but decent) snap shots.
     
  8. Eatonpcat

    Eatonpcat
    Minister of Fire

    Jul 24, 2011
    2,070
    956
    Loc:
    Eaton Township, Ohio
    I have this camera also...Took nice pictures, but the zoom broke after 4 or 5 years (Not bad for a $200.00 camera).
     
  9. begreen

    begreen
    Mooderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    61,001
    7,743
    Loc:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    They have good reviews of less expensive cameras too. It's a good reference point.
     
  10. fossil

    fossil
    Accidental Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 30, 2007
    10,531
    2,413
    Loc:
    Bend, OR
  11. fossil

    fossil
    Accidental Moderator
    Staff Member

    Sep 30, 2007
    10,531
    2,413
    Loc:
    Bend, OR
  12. SlyFerret

    SlyFerret
    Minister of Fire

    Feb 12, 2007
    1,445
    57
    Loc:
    Delaware, Ohio
    Lots of great options from Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Sony, and some others.

    Just to set your expectations, coming from a DSLR, you may be slightly disappointed with the shutter response time. They have gotten much better, but still aren't quite instant like the DSLR.

    -SF
     
  13. bogydave

    bogydave
    Minister of Fire

    Dec 4, 2009
    8,426
    3,446
    Loc:
    So Cent ALASKA
  14. webbie

    webbie
    Seasoned Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 17, 2005
    12,190
    1,086
    Loc:
    Western Mass.
    Under $200 you can't go wrong with the Canon stuff. I just gave mine to my son who is a photog and he is greatly impressed. For an example, below is an unprocessed shot from one.

    I sold the big Nikon DSLR and bought me the Sony RX - and a super-zoom. I use the Sony for 95% of stuff, and it does just about as good as the SLR.

    Different "eyes" seem to like different camera's processing. I tend to like the Sony and Canon brighter colors...right out of the box. Other cams may process less in camera and need touch up.

    canon1.jpg canon2.jpg canon3.jpg
     
  15. billb3

    billb3
    Minister of Fire

    Dec 14, 2007
    4,315
    601
    Loc:
    SE Mass
    I bought a little canon elph 300 to take on a cruise - to fit in a pocket for when I really didn't want to be lugging a D80 around.
    It's just 5x but I tend to only use the zoom to crop a little bit. Has done fairly well in some low light, too, unlike an Olympus gotten for a kid. (rugged was a priority and no extending lens to break)
    I didn't have any trouble with no viewfinder but it is a bit odd at first.
     
  16. homebrewz

    homebrewz
    Minister of Fire

    Nov 29, 2005
    1,052
    75
    Loc:
    East Central, NY
    I would recommend an older Canon. Small, lots of features and if its a few years out, it will be relatively inexpensive. Something like the Canon PowerShot SD1100 or the SD1200. I have an SD870, but I only got it over the SD1100 because of the wide angle feature.

    I would argue in favor of something with a rechargeable battery. For these cameras that are a couple of years out, extra batteries are easily bought on ebay for around 5 to 10 dollars and the batteries are small and compact. I think the weight and size of an extra battery and charger would be close to having to carry extra AA batteries. Besides, digital cameras tend to use a lot of energy when operating the digital display. You will go through the AA's faster then you think. Also, using a Li Ion battery that will last through 1000+ charge/recharge cycles means less alkaline batteries in the landfill.

    I would also get an extra memory card or two. Memory is cheap these days and the cards these cameras come with usually don't have a lot of storage.

    edit: another vote for dpreview.com
     
  17. begreen

    begreen
    Mooderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 18, 2005
    61,001
    7,743
    Loc:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    I run my Canon on rechargeable AA batteries. What I really like about it is that all around the world you can get AA batteries. It is a pain to be out on a jaunt in a new city and suddenly need a recharge. In that case I just stop at the nearest tobacco shop and get a fresh pair. My Canon video camera has a proprietary rechargeable battery and when it is out it's back to the hotel for a recharge.
     
  18. firefighterjake

    firefighterjake
    Minister of Fire

    Jul 22, 2008
    17,138
    3,582
    Loc:
    Unity/Bangor, Maine
    Thought I would update folks . . . after much research and hemming and hawing . . . I ordered a Canon Powershot Elph 110 from Crutchfield . . . partly from some of you who gave glowing recommendations of Canon cameras. I also was taking a long, hard look at the Sony Cybershot 150, but in the end it came down to simple economics . . . getting what seems to be a decent camera at a good price.

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/839268-REG/Canon_6042B001_PowerShot_ELPH_110_HS.html#pr-header-G1660925
     

Share This Page