Recommend a chain upgrade...

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tramontana

Burning Hunk
Oct 23, 2012
198
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
...for my MS280?

I've been running Stihl Oilomatic 3 chain loops labeled 26RMC3, with an 18" bar.

My dealer has a 26 RS 74 he's recommending, but I thought I would post up my question here. Anyone recommend for or against the Stihl Rapid Super?

Cheers!
 
The rmc3 is safety semi chisel. Lose the "3" when buying stihl chain (yellow over green)

Your dealer is recommending full chisel non- safety (should be RSC).

Follow his advice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScotO and smokinj
Yep, that was the first thing I did when I got my saws. Actually, maybe the second. The MS660 came with full chisel RSC chain and the MS261 came with 26RMC3. The chips from the MS660 were so much larger on the first day of cutting that I ordered the full chisel chain for the MS261 later that day. The difference is noticeable. Just understand that the RS chain is non-safety chain and more prone to kickback.
 
RMC3 is the most disappointing Stihl chain I've tried. I had a 290 that came with.325 pitch RMC3, and switching to .325 RSC (now RS) made a dramatic difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScotO
Another for RSC
 
RMC3 is the most disappointing Stihl chain I've tried. I had a 290 that came with.325 pitch RMC3, and switching to .325 RSC (now RS) made a dramatic difference.

You sir, must never have run RM2. :confused: Compared to that RMC3 is a dream.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScotO
+1 for RS
But RS & RS3 are the same cutter. Should cut the same speed all being equal. Just some safety built into in the RS3.
What am I missing? Isn't a little safety built in a good thing?

But why not the RS3 ? The the safety "single humped drive link" only comes into play on the nose area of the bar where kickback is caused.
Whe the chain rolls over the nose the hump sticks up to keep the cutter from digging in deeper if the nose gets into wood.
It reduces kickback but don't totally prevent it. The rest of the time it is even with the raker just like the RS.
Why is the RS better than the RS3 ?




RS3: RS3.jpg


The RS is the same cutter but no "humped drive link".
I don't see where it would be faster it you are not using the nose of the bar. Should cut the same as the RS3.
When you file the raker, you also file some of the hump on the drive link.

RS:rs.jpg



The Oregon LPX is similar to the RS3, a little kick back reduction & smoother cutting, where
the LGX is similar to the RS, no kick back reduction.

Also FYI:
Quote from stihl: "RS3 chain typically cuts faster than RM chain, but requires careful sharpening and maintenance to continue to perform well."

RM is a little better if you are cutting dirty stuff, don't dull quit as fast & like Sthil says, gotta keep the chisel chain sharp to perform well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScotO
+1 for RS
But RS & RS3 are the same cutter. Should cut the same speed all being equal. Just some safety built into in the RS3.
What am I missing? Isn't a little safety built in a good thing?

But why not the RS3 ? The the safety "single humped drive link" only comes into play on the nose area of the bar where kickback is caused.
Whe the chain rolls over the nose the hump sticks up to keep the cutter from digging in deeper if the nose gets into wood.
It reduces kickback but don't totally prevent it. The rest of the time it is even with the raker just like the RS.
Why is the RS better than the RS3 ?




RS3: View attachment 85551


The RS is the same cutter but no "humped drive link".
I don't see where it would be faster it you are not using the nose of the bar. Should cut the same as the RS3.
When you file the raker, you also file some of the hump on the drive link.

RS:View attachment 85552



Also FYI:
Quote from stihl: "RS3 chain typically cuts faster than RM chain, but requires careful sharpening and maintenance to continue to perform well."

RM is a little better if you are cutting dirty stuff, don't dull quit as fast & like Sthil says, gotta keep the chisel chain sharp to perform well.

RS3/RSC3 is really quite good unless the nose of the bar is buried. That's where the guard links (humped drive-links) do their work.
 
I got the duro carbide for my stihl ms250 18". It has a great cut.
Not sure if your putting carbide in the mix. It hardly seems worn at all.
expensive though. I got it for black locust.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.