Anybody have experience with both?I'm gonna buy a new stove for my cottage,Just wondering if one has an advantage over the other..i.e.-larger heat exchange area?I'm considering the step tops from Regency and Quadrafire.Let me know your thoughts.
Step-top or flat-top stove?
- Thread starter titan
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
- Status
My old stove was a flat top and the new one is a step. I prefer the step with the thinner steel being used today for the structural rigidity it adds to the top plate. The old one never warped the top plate but it was 3/8" steel. Most top plates now are 1/4" or 5/16". The original reason for step tops was the higher temp on the upper step and lower temp on the lower step for cooking different stuff at the same time.
Thanks BB-thecooking part makes a good case for the step-top design.....so..It's bread rising on the top shelf and beans baking on the lower?MMM.
WidowMaker
Member
WidowMaker said:
My Quad is the same, I can boil water on the lower step while just a simmer on the top.
John_M
Minister of Fire
I like the looks of the step top stoves compared to the flat top stoves. I also like the contemporary looks of a stove w/pedestal base compared to the classic legged models. I guess that is why some manufacturers make both kinds of stoves.
Best wishes,
John_M
Best wishes,
John_M
Good point on the Quad and Lopi. Some stoves have ventilated step tops, some are solid. Stoves with ventilated step tops will be cooler on the upper step because of the air space. Regency has a ventilated top step as well I believe. Englander's 30NC, Drolet's Pyropak, Buck's 261 step are not.
- Status
Similar threads
