1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
  1. Coal Reaper Member

    joined: Aug 10, 2012
    224 posts
    NJ
    anybody have any experience with this yet? with slant fin baseboards, might it be beneficial for one to set this up to regulate a constant return temp (140/150*?) sent back to storage? the thought is that most of the water in storage would be cycled through only once before needing to be recharged. i imagine it might be good for stratification?
    or would delta T be better?
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. bigburner Feeling the Heat

    joined: Aug 28, 2010
    437 posts
    Just started a system this week with 10 of them, N gas con wall hung boilers. Have not set up the delta t function on the injection risers yet. [running CP for now] But, so far, so good.
  3. PassionForFire&Water Feeling the Heat

    joined: Jan 14, 2011
    302 posts
    Billerica, MA
    I like the 4 possible settings:
    CP - Constant Power (Fixed Speed): Allows for 4 fixed circulator speeds.
    SP - Setpoint (Variable Speed): Allows for a fixed supply temperature from 65°F to 220°F.
    dE - Delta-T, Differential Temperature (Variable Speed): Allows for a fixed system temperature differential (dT) from 5°F to 50°F.

    Since when are they available?
    Any known problems with them?

    Also nice it that it gives you the GPM. So there must be some sort of a flow meter inside the device.
    Knowing the flow and the supply/return temp, you can basically calculate your BTU/hr

    Is there any interface to the outside to make it a BTU meter?
  4. Coal Reaper Member

    joined: Aug 10, 2012
    224 posts
    NJ
    10 wow. Let us know wen u start playing.
  5. Coal Reaper Member

    joined: Aug 10, 2012
    224 posts
    NJ
    Idk but pexsupply has them now.
  6. ewdudley Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 17, 2009
    1,182 posts
    Cayuga County NY
    Yet it looks like somehow they failed to consider the possibility of 'cooling mode' where increased speed causes decreased temperature.

    I'd be interested in trying one for boiler return temperature protection to control the injector pump, but unless I've missed something in the documentation there does not exist a mode that could be used for that.
  7. PassionForFire&Water Feeling the Heat

    joined: Jan 14, 2011
    302 posts
    Billerica, MA
    Yes, boiler return temperature protection came to my mind also. Just the $190 price tag, electrical wiring, .. it adds up.
    For my applications I stick with a LK810 valve.

    I'm very interested in getting that GPM signal in one or another way.
    The most economical priced flow meters (in-line) are around $450. The you need some thermocouples a microprocessor, a display
    This would bring the cost for a BTU-meter way down.

    Would be nice if they could offer this as an option.
    They have everything there.
  8. avc8130 Minister of Fire

    If you know your supply temp, you can use Delta T to set return temp protection...sort of.
  9. Bob Rohr Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 9, 2008
    565 posts
    SW Missouri

    The flowmeters used for solar systems, up to 10 gpm, are fairly accurate and well under 100 bucks. Add a solar differential controller with heat quanity metering function, most include that. The control could run one or multiple pumps and vary the speed. The whole package would be under 300 bucks. Dual pump control, differential and setpoint, variable speed, and BTU monitoring.

    Attached Files:

  10. Karl_northwind Member

    joined: Feb 13, 2012
    81 posts
    Central Wi.
    how have the digital flow meters (grundfos I believe) working? I have one on my drainback system, but have yet to get the $30 cable to connect it to my BX controller.
  11. Coal Reaper Member

    joined: Aug 10, 2012
    224 posts
    NJ
    rather than boiler protection, i was thinking of using the constant temp capability of the pump to slow down flow in fin tube and extract all of the "usable" BTU's out of the hot water before it goes back to storage. is this asinine?
  12. JP11 Minister of Fire

    joined: May 15, 2011
    812 posts
    Central Maine

    I guess I'm confused about the end game of savings here. So the goal is to slow down your flow to baseboards.. to extract maximum heat from the water before returning to storage. So, the only "savings" would be in electricity right? As the return to storage temp being higher isn't a factor.. the BTUs are in the water, and inside the home.. so nothing being "lost"

    The savings being lower electric cost to run the pump slower... correct?

    I'd be curious to see how long the payback would be on the increased cost for the pump vs. electric costs. I guess you could figure it at min current draw vs a standard 007 or something.

    JP
  13. maple1 Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 15, 2011
    1,965 posts
    Nova Scotia
    I'm thinking it's along the lines of being able to slow the flow as your supply temps drop - thereby getting more heat out of the lower temp water than if under constant speed which would return colder water to bottom of storage therefore in turn extending your 'usable' storage capacity. I.e. in a somewhat-similar way that radiant floor heat extends usable storage by being able to use lower temp water.
  14. Coal Reaper Member

    joined: Aug 10, 2012
    224 posts
    NJ
    yes, and i feel like you would have a more consistent supply temp for a longer period of time if it is not being cycled as fast. but does this matter for anything?
  15. Coal Reaper Member

    joined: Aug 10, 2012
    224 posts
    NJ
    my thought was to put the temp sensor on the return line. this would increase the flow as water temperature dropped in order to maintain the same (constant return temp) BTU transfer to house of higher temp water at lower flow. this is what i am questioning if it helps extend usable storage capacity.
  16. JP11 Minister of Fire

    joined: May 15, 2011
    812 posts
    Central Maine
    AHA! I see.. So if you currently had your storage quit supplying heat at 150.. because of poor baseboard performance... or not being able to maintain set temp in the house...

    You were hoping that an increased flow speed would overcome the reduced efficiency of baseboard.... and be able to run your storage to lower temps.

    My limiting factor is my DHW.. I have it set to 132. So I can run my storage down to 135. I guess those with baseboards would be calling it quits at a higher temp.

    Only one way to find out..... try it! :)

    JP
  17. Coal Reaper Member

    joined: Aug 10, 2012
    224 posts
    NJ
    EUREKA!
    with regaurds to DHW, i am going to have the problem with any pump. my DHW takes priority when it calls for heat. after it is satisfied then the rest of the zones resume. i think if needed bumble bee would just jack up the flow to transfer more BTU's by simply maintaining that set temp point on the return.
    i think where BB would really shine is in delta T mode with heat exchangers.

Share This Page