1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
  1. DanCorcoran Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 5, 2010
    1,782 posts
    Richmond, VA
    My 42cc, 18-inch Craftsman (ten years old) has plenty of power for my needs and cuts well with a sharp chain (which I can't keep sharp for long, but that's another story). What aggravates me, however, is that it is almost impossible to restart when it's hot, after refueling. When cold, it'll start on the second or third pull and runs well. When hot, you can pull for 15 minutes without the slightest sign of ignition. It takes several hours for it to cool enough for a cold start.

    I've decided to get a Stihl 291 (plenty of power and light weight, which is important because I'm 66 and apparently not going to get any younger). Before I do, however, I'd like some assurance that I'm not going to have the same problem with the Stihl. I'm very careful about cleaning air filters, using fresh fuel, and replacing fuel filters and plugs at appropriate intervals. Given all this, is a new Stihl going to begin having the same "hard starting when hot" problem that I have with my Craftsman? (This particular model was made by Poulan).

    I'd appreciate anyone with experience commenting...
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
  3. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
    The Stihls run great. They aren't poulans (pullin and pullin and pullin). The 291 is good value for the money for occassional use, but Stihl offers better saws. The 291 saw isn't lightweight. It'll get the job done but you'll be happier with a 261 or 362 or 440. They have better power to weight ratios. If you're only running the saw now and then the 291 will save you some money. If you can afford to spend a little more- the other saws will work YOU less and make your work feel more like play.
  4. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
    Sounds like your carburetor is out of adjustment or losing prime. You could get the saw repaired instead of buying another saw.
  5. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
    you're not choking the carb after refueling and flooding it.....? I'd guess you know how to operate the saw after 10 years....? Just thought I'd ask the question.
  6. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
    try refueling before running out of fuel. Don't choke it when its warm/hot. Have you tried that?
  7. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
    Your Stihl dealer can sell you a Stihl chain to fit your poulan which will stay sharper longer than your Oregon chain. Don't let your chain touch dirt. Dirt dulls a chain 10x faster than wood.
  8. BJ64 Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 24, 2008
    608 posts
    NE Oklahoma
    Get the Stihl 291.

    The old Craftsman might be fixable and still be a good saw but I would still get the new 291.

    At your age you have most likely earned a new rig anyway but Stihl has an excellent anti-vibration system that you will surly appreciate at the end of the day.

    The new saw may take a few extra pulls to get it started till the rings get seated good. Read the manual - it has a break in procedure for the first two tanks of fuel. After that the dealer should check the carb adjustments for you and it should be good to go.

    Hard to start issues are usually fixed with a new spark plug. On the Stihl saws I defiantly recommend the NGK brand spark plugs and keep a spare handy. The Bosch brand plugs are ok but don't even think about using a Champion plug in it all.

    With and annual carb adjustment and a few spark plugs along with your usual maintenance - your hard starting issues should be over.

    Although I have an issue with a Stihl chain that I purchased the other day, I believe the problem is isolated to a small batch. I recommend using the Stihl brand chain and using the sharpening kit also. Learn how to use the flat file to keep a proper depth of cut. I do this and you can make a chain cut good even after using it all the way back to the end.
    [IMG]
    Their brand of chain does seem to stay sharp longer and it cuts fast.

    Oh! and get the case too. You can stuff the File kit, tools, and the spark plugs in it and keep everything together!
  9. MasterMech Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 2, 2011
    4,782 posts
    Hudson Valley NY
    I can't guarantee you'll never have a problem with a Stihl. For that matter I can't guarantee you will have a problem with another Poulan. That said, Stihl has a fantastic track record with regards to reliability and performance. I run an 034 that's at least 25 years old and it fires like it's a brand new saw.

    If you really want to upgrade on the cheap I'd be looking for a MS290. They're still available and $100 cheaper than the MS291. Power and weight are similar and the saw is built almost stupid simple making repairs/maintenance a snap.

    The MS291 is a nice package but Stihl really closed the price gap with the pro saws. What used to be a $200+ jump is now less than half that. I'd put the MS261 on your watch list. As an older gentleman I think you'll really appreciate the lightweight now and the better anti-vibe after you've put your first few days of work in with it. The superior ergonomics is an often overlooked but well appreciated feature after the sale with a pro level saw. Especially with the fellas who "aren't getting any younger." ;)
  10. Bigg_Redd Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 19, 2008
    2,945 posts
    Shelton, WA
    If weight is an issue skip the 291. It'll be noticeably heavier than your Craftsman and it's even a little heavier (and more expensive) than a 290.

    If you want more power and less weight and easier starting I'd start with the 261/271.

    Hot starting any new Stihl won't be an issue.
  11. MasterMech Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 2, 2011
    4,782 posts
    Hudson Valley NY

    Wow Redd, is that a recommendation for a mid-range saw? !! Holy.... (Just kiddin' man ;) )
  12. Bigg_Redd Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 19, 2008
    2,945 posts
    Shelton, WA
    the 270/271/280 are legit. Mid-range in name only.
  13. DanCorcoran Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 5, 2010
    1,782 posts
    Richmond, VA
    "If weight is an issue skip the 291. It'll be noticeably heavier than your Craftsman and it's even a little heavier (and more expensive) than a 290.

    If you want more power and less weight and easier starting I'd start with the 261/271."

    I was using Stihl's Comparison Chart as a reference. It shows that the 290 weighs 13.0 #, the 271 weighs 12.3#, and the 291 weighs less than either, at 12.1#. The 291 does weigh 8 ounces more than the 261, but has exactly the same BHP and costs $90 less. That's how I ended up choosing the 291. For the cord or two or three I cut for my cabin each year (mostly bucking, almost no felling), upgrading to pro just didn't seem justified.

    Before I spring for the 291, though, I wanted some reassurance on the hard starting issue...thanks!
  14. HittinSteel Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 11, 2008
    1,430 posts
    Northeastern Ohio
    Isn't the 291 on the 271 platform instead of the 3 series homeowner saws like it used to be? This would explain the weight differences. I'd say the 291 is likely a good upgrade over the anemic/heavy 290, but I've never run one. I'd personally buck up less than an additional $100 and get the 261........ or better yet, for the price of the 291, a 346XP ;)
  15. MasterMech Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 2, 2011
    4,782 posts
    Hudson Valley NY
    MS290/MS310/MS390 were their own platform. MS210/MS230/MS250 were the homeowner saws along with the MS170/MS180. Only the 440/460 shared a "platform" for the pro saws. Stihl has changed all that now of course with the MS261/MS271/MS291/MS311/MS391 and MS362 all sharing a common platform.
  16. DanCorcoran Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 5, 2010
    1,782 posts
    Richmond, VA
    What, in a chainsaw, is a "platform"?
  17. BJ64 Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 24, 2008
    608 posts
    NE Oklahoma
    I can relate to the starting issues. I'm pondering on getting a Stihl 660. At 91cc it better start easy or I will be wore out before I even start on the real work.

    Over the years I have had several Stihl saws and I'm using 3 now. If I ever had to pull the starter more that 7 or 8 times on a cold start, or more than 3 times on a warm start, I knew I had a problem. Perhaps it was out of gas, dirty air filter, or it needed a spark plug.

    There were only two times that these fixes had failed and I had to go to the shop. One issue was with a 12 year old saw that had acquired a hole in a fuel line. The other event was my fault and involved two saws that did not get enough oil in the fuel. That scared up the chamber walls to the point that they did not have enough compression to start easy.

    On a day to day basis though, I have been very happy with how they have all started and how easy they were to take care of. I expect the same for you with the 291.
  18. BJ64 Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 24, 2008
    608 posts
    NE Oklahoma
    That is a series of saws built on the same or similar frame and possibly use the same engine block just bored differently for each model in the family.
  19. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
    [quote="DanCorcoran, post: 1108546,

    Before I spring for the 291, though, I wanted some reassurance on the hard starting issue...thanks![/quote]
    When my craftsman/poulan was ten years old it was a pita to start warm or cold. On that saw the piston was scored and compression was low.
  20. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
    low compression can also make starting more difficult. It's possible that the poulan is worn out. I wouldn't say that a stihl is any harder or any easier to start than a poulan. I have owned two craftsman poulans myself. They are pretty good saws. Any chainsaw in good working order and used properly should be easy to start. Either there is something mechanicaly wrong with your saw or its operator error.
  21. Jags Super Moderator

    joined: Aug 2, 2006
    11,309 posts
    Northern Illinois
    Your hot starting problems will not resurface if you go with the 290/291 model (or the 260). These saws are tried, true and are good firewood saws.

    The pull-on will now do nothing more than sit on the shelf.
  22. surviverguy New Member

    joined: Mar 19, 2012
    99 posts
    When your Stihl becomes ten years old it'll have starting problems also. Stihl and poulan use the same carburetors. The fuel lines and filters are basicaly the same. Fuel filters, fuel lines and carb kits are needed in all saws at some point in time. The Stihls are much better saws than the poulans. Better starter recoil, better chain tensioning, longer lasting sprockets and bars, longer lasting engines, better ergonomics, more weight/power options.
  23. Bigg_Redd Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 19, 2008
    2,945 posts
    Shelton, WA
    My mistake. I was looking at the 291 C-BEQ model.
  24. ohlongarm Minister of Fire

    joined: Mar 18, 2011
    703 posts
    Northeastern Ohio
    The 291 is a great saw I've done it all with it,easy to handle starts easily,but I like my 250 also real superlight and does well .
  25. amateur cutter Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 20, 2010
    1,118 posts
    West Michigan
    Hey Dan, I know you mentioned the 291, but if you can find a dealer with MS 260 still new you'll be impressed. I promise. A C

Share This Page