1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Eric Johnson Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 18, 2005
    5,703 posts
    Central NYS
    My original thread got hijacked by the techies below, but since they're having such an interesting discussion, I thought it would be better to start another thread and let this one run its interesting course. I'd change the title to something more appropriate, but don't know how/can't.
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. TMonter Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 8, 2007
    1,238 posts
    Hayden, ID
    Boiler efficiency depends on several factors, but the biggest are stack exit temperature and moisture content of the fuel.

    I'm currently working on a large wood fired boiler burning 55% moisture fuel and the efficiency looks like this:

    Radiation Losses % 0.40%
    Unburnt Carbon Loss % 0.75%
    MFR Margin % 1.50%
    Dry Flue Gas Loss % 7.53%
    Moisture Loss (Fuel and Produced) % 23.19%
    Moisture Loss in Air % 0.18%
    Total Losses % 33.55%
    Boiler Efficiency For above Fuel Eff. 66.45%
  3. Nofossil Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 4, 2007
    3,279 posts
    Addison County, Vermont
    Excellent. Is this measured or modeled data?

    One of the ideas that we've been toying with is recapturing the latent heat of vaporization for the water in the flue gas by letting it condense out on yet another heat exchanger. Early tests are interesting. Makes a lot more sense if you're burning greener wood, I think. We're not that far above the point where that could happen - my flue gas hovers around 250 most of the time.
  4. TMonter Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 8, 2007
    1,238 posts
    Hayden, ID
    Both Actually.

    It's modeled data backed up by real world testing.
  5. Nofossil Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 4, 2007
    3,279 posts
    Addison County, Vermont
    I love this stuff. Couple more questions if you have the patience:

    I assume that moisture/fuel and produced is the water that's in the wood plus the water created by burning the hydrogen that's in the wood?

    What flue gas temperature is this all based on?

    What are you using for the chemical makeup and mass of flue gas per pound of wood? I've derived a few number based on assumptions about the initial composition of wood and the chain of chemical reactions that take place during combustion, but I have no real data. I'm curious to see how far off I've been.

    Thanks for furthering my education.
  6. TMonter Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 8, 2007
    1,238 posts
    Hayden, ID
    Yes. In the case of wood fuel the produced quantity is pretty small.

    330F Exit temperature.
  7. TMonter Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 8, 2007
    1,238 posts
    Hayden, ID
    I wish I could upload a PDF of the worksheet. Tell Craig to fix that ;-)
  8. Nofossil Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 4, 2007
    3,279 posts
    Addison County, Vermont
    Sent you a PM with a link to my private site. Is it OK to share with others?
  9. TMonter Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 8, 2007
    1,238 posts
    Hayden, ID
    Uploaded the file but can't seem to link to it. What's the URL of the directory?
  10. Nofossil Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 4, 2007
    3,279 posts
    Addison County, Vermont
    You can't link to it - it's behind my firewall. I can put it in a public location if that's OK, and post a link here. Didn't want to do that without your blessing.

    Great document, by the way.
  11. TMonter Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 8, 2007
    1,238 posts
    Hayden, ID
    That's fine. Go Ahead and post the link.
  12. Nofossil Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 4, 2007
    3,279 posts
    Addison County, Vermont
    Here it is: TMonter's Combustion Worksheet - a thing of rare beauty. Thanks for making this available. How many folks here remember 'stoichiometric' from their chemistry classes?
  13. Nofossil Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 4, 2007
    3,279 posts
    Addison County, Vermont
    100,000 pounds of wood per hour - that's some boiler! Erics's 43 cords would be gone in a couple of hours.

    Also works out pretty close to my numbers. I'm getting around 18,000,000 BTU/cord of dry wood. This is around 13,000,000 BTU/cord of wet wood depending on your weight/cord numbers.

    I'll make use of this data - thanks again.
  14. ISeeDeadBTUs Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 7, 2007
    2,241 posts
    NY
    OK, my freakin head hurts. Maybe it's the chemistry of this Martini, maybe it's the fact I never took Chemistry. Maybe it's the High pressure aloft that dove the temp up to 59 on Nov 21!!
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page