Sitting on 3, maybe 4, years of wood that is cut and stacked right now and am just about out of space. Have the opportunity for some more wood, locust, oak and hickory. Taken out 2 loads of locust, have room for maybe one more. Question is, which would you go for, the oak, hickory or locust? All are in the same location and all will sit outside split and stacked for some time. Need to build a woodshed!
Wood Preference
- Thread starter Beardog
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
- Status
hilbiliarkiboi
Member
Never burned locust, knowingly. Love hickory for the coldest nights. It seems to burn a little longer than oak, but that may be in the (my) seasoning. Oak ultra dry - hickory purtydangdry.
adrpga498
Minister of Fire
steeltowninwv
Minister of Fire
locust..season in half the time...and in my opinion best wood to burn when it gets cold
Wood Duck
Minister of Fire
If it is Black Locust that is what I'd choose because it rots very little. Second oak, then hickory last because it is the most likely to rot. If you stack them and keep them off the ground any of the three should last a long time, but since you asked, I chose. I am assuming all are equally easy to reach. If there is a difference in how easy they are to reach or if one is straghter than another I'd take the easiest wood first.
adrpga498
Minister of Fire
Okay, I know no one likes a wise guy so my attempt at humor failed. I'd pick the locust 1st, dries faster, straight splits, burns very very hot.
If I had a choice between the three, and we were talking about heating, it'd be locust. Hands-down. Now if we was talking about heating AND cooking, then it'd be hickory and locust. don't get me wrong, I love burning oak. It just takes forever to season, and hickory takes almost just as long.
lopiliberty
Minister of Fire
I would take locust first because for me that is what seems to throw the most heat and burn the longest. Just be sure to mix it in with other wood. Never fill the stove with just locust or you might melt it
It really depends upon if you will have a future opportunity to get the rest of it. Black locust, post oak and the red oaks tend to last a very long time when in contact with the ground. So I would leave them behind IF you can come back to it.
If this source of wood will permanently dry up I would take the locust and if there is a substantial amount of hickory I would try to market it. It goes for a premium at restaurants. With the money earned I would build a wood shed.
If this source of wood will permanently dry up I would take the locust and if there is a substantial amount of hickory I would try to market it. It goes for a premium at restaurants. With the money earned I would build a wood shed.
Backwoods Savage
Minister of Fire
bogydave
Minister of Fire
Chimney sweep btu chart:
Hickory, SB . . 25.3 Mil BTU/cord
Hickory , Pig. 23.7 " "
Honey locust.... 23.7 Mil BTU/cord
Black locust .....23.2 " "
I go with the Shag Bark Hickory. (2.1 million BTU more per cord)
Multi use heat & cooking, more BTUs
PS: "White Oak" is more BTU/cord than locust on the chart. (24.2 MBTU/cord)
Hard to get a true BTU comparison. This was the only chart I found with both woods tested & on the same chart.
Seems different areas have different wood densities. (or different methods to calculate BTU)
http://www.chimneysweeponline.com/howood.htm
But in Alaska, I have birch & spruce.
So you guys with a big variety can probably answer the question better.
I used math from a known chart.
Why is locust so much better than hickory?
Hickory, SB . . 25.3 Mil BTU/cord
Hickory , Pig. 23.7 " "
Honey locust.... 23.7 Mil BTU/cord
Black locust .....23.2 " "
I go with the Shag Bark Hickory. (2.1 million BTU more per cord)
Multi use heat & cooking, more BTUs
PS: "White Oak" is more BTU/cord than locust on the chart. (24.2 MBTU/cord)
Hard to get a true BTU comparison. This was the only chart I found with both woods tested & on the same chart.
Seems different areas have different wood densities. (or different methods to calculate BTU)
http://www.chimneysweeponline.com/howood.htm
But in Alaska, I have birch & spruce.
So you guys with a big variety can probably answer the question better.
I used math from a known chart.
Why is locust so much better than hickory?
bogydave
Minister of Fire
Found another on with locust, hickory & oak on the chart. Hickory still near the top compared to locust.
http://allentowntree.com/Firewood.html
http://allentowntree.com/Firewood.html
blujacket
Minister of Fire
Because it seasons fast, doesn't rot, and has almost as many btu's as Hickory & White Oak. I will take Locust over all others because of that.
- Status
