1. Welcome Hearth.com Guests and Visitors - Please enjoy our forums!
    Hearth.com GOLD Sponsors who help bring the site content to you:
    Jotul Cast Iron Stoves
    Woodstock Soapstone Stoves
    Hearth and Home (QuadraFire and Harman Stoves)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CarbonNeutral Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 20, 2009
    1,132 posts
    Nashoba Valley(ish), MA
    I have a reasonably good range of species to burn - it got me thinking, if I only was 'allowed' two, for whatever reason - what would they be?

    From my experiences so far (which are limited) I think I would go for hemlock - low ash, quick to get fire up to temperature, good to build base for my next choice: Locust - low moisture to begin with, long overnight burn, easy to split.

    I've been burning a lot of maple, but far too much ash to make it to my choice of two..
    #1

    Helpful Sponsor Ads!



  2. boostnut Member

    joined: Nov 2, 2007
    216 posts
    central IL
    Locust and ash.
  3. jdscj8 New Member

    joined: Feb 19, 2009
    128 posts
    Eastern,Nebraska
    Out of all mine i would say hedge (burns real hot and for a long,long time) and ash (ashs great and calms the hedge down). JD
  4. ROBERT F Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 2, 2009
    547 posts
    CENTRAL COLORADO
    My two kinds would have to be "free" and "dry" :cheese:
  5. CarbonNeutral Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 20, 2009
    1,132 posts
    Nashoba Valley(ish), MA
    Ah, but you're screwed now - I'm counting those as separate species, so you have free wood that's wet, and dry wood you paid for. And because it's 'my' thread, I saying the free wood will never dry. So there.. :)
  6. basswidow Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 17, 2008
    1,268 posts
    northern nj
    here in northern jersey, seems to be alot of cherry. I like it. Seasons well and burns well.

    !) Oak
    2) Cherry
  7. Jags Super Moderator

    joined: Aug 2, 2006
    11,309 posts
    Northern Illinois
    Hickory and maple.
    or
    White Oak and Ash
    or
    Osage and maple.
  8. smokinj Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 11, 2008
    15,420 posts
    Anderson, Indiana
    ash and beech
  9. Stevebass4 Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 18, 2006
    845 posts
    Franklin MA
    ash and oak
  10. LLigetfa Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 9, 2008
    7,310 posts
    NW Ontario
    Is this based on fantasy or on what is easily obtainable? Based on availability, I choose Ash first and Birch second. If fantasy, dunno...
  11. rdust Minister of Fire

    joined: Feb 9, 2009
    3,345 posts
    Michigan
    Ash and any Oak
  12. CarbonNeutral Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 20, 2009
    1,132 posts
    Nashoba Valley(ish), MA
    I picked two that I have in my pile, but yes, if fantasy, I don't know what I should choose - ash by the looks of the results so far.. Maybe a 'coal tree'
  13. Danno77 Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 27, 2008
    4,751 posts
    Hamilton, IL
    Black locust and black walnut.
    once you go black, you never go back.
  14. CarbonNeutral Minister of Fire

    joined: Jan 20, 2009
    1,132 posts
    Nashoba Valley(ish), MA
    I admit it, I chortled.
  15. billb3 Minister of Fire

    joined: Dec 14, 2007
    3,067 posts
    SE Mass
    Until this year I never kept mine seperate beyond hardwood and </<white pine>>.
    So a little of this and a little of that is what I've always burned. If it was dry and fit it went in. (except for those that were too long and came back out)


    I've burned pine seperate. Pine ash seems a bit <<fluffier>>.



    Never really mattered to me which wood had a bit more ash. Had to be shovelled out regardless.
    Usually sometime before there was more ash in there than firewood. :)
  16. Bigg_Redd Minister of Fire

    joined: Oct 19, 2008
    2,946 posts
    Shelton, WA

    Doug Fir and Western Red Cedar (for kindling)
  17. ikessky Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 2, 2008
    856 posts
    Northern WI
    Hard maple and ironwood
  18. backpack09 Minister of Fire

    joined: Sep 10, 2007
    550 posts
    Whitman, Mass
    pine and spruce.
  19. peterc38 New Member

    joined: Sep 10, 2009
    270 posts
    Maine
    Based on local availability here I'd say:

    1.) Sugar maple
    2.) Red Oak
  20. JustWood Minister of Fire

    joined: Aug 14, 2007
    3,185 posts
    Arrow Bridge,NY
    Hard Maple
    White Oak
    Been burning about 90% beech for the last 6-8 years but only because it's plentiful and easy pickens. Does make great heat but I prefer H Maple and W Oak.
  21. daveswoodhauler Minister of Fire

    joined: May 20, 2008
    1,827 posts
    Massachusetts
    Maple and oak for me.....maples splits real easy and lights up fast. (Don't have too much Ash around here)
    Oak is nice..takes longer to season, but I got time.
    A runner up would be beech
  22. firefighterjake Minister of Fire

    joined: Jul 22, 2008
    13,475 posts
    Unity/Bangor, Maine
    Ash and sugar maple
  23. quads Minister of Fire

    joined: Nov 19, 2005
    2,747 posts
    Central Sands, Wisconsin
    Someday maybe I'll burn something I like even better, but so far my two favorite wood types list is: Choke Cherry and Bur Oak.
  24. CowboyAndy New Member

    joined: Feb 29, 2008
    744 posts
    Chateaugay, NY
    in fantasy land i would go with hickory and sugar maple.

    in the real world, based upon avalibility, abundance, ease of splitting and burning uses i would go with sugar maple and pine or possibly ash.
  25. joshlaugh New Member

    joined: May 1, 2009
    330 posts
    Granville, Ohio
    ash and bitternut hickory
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page