I just ran across a thread
https://www.hearth.com/talk/threads/palazzetti-prima-pellet-stove-is-awesome.101210/ where the same OP claimed "Damn stove uses almost 50% less pellets than my previous stoves" . While not a great difference it is not the same as 40%. On another page in that same thread you write it`s saving you 30% compared to the Quad.
This is what I mean about exaggerations. I think most of us tend to have a propensity to embellish something we really like and that`s probably normal..
If in fact this is truly a standout pellet stove and will indeed cut pellet useage 40% over competing models , then we can be assured it or similar technology will find it`s way into more stoves and showrooms and will be "the" pellet stove to buy.
I apologize if I come across as insulting or offensive , that wasn`t my intent.
There`s nothing I`d like more than finding out that I`m dead wrong in all my assumptions.