cherry vs hackberry

Burn wise both produce about the same amount of heat. Both season in 12 months or less. Cherry splits easy, and hackberry can be stringy. Cherry sap wood rots but the heart wood is solid. Hackberry will turn punky if not properly split/stacked quickly.

If I could only pick one of the two I would choose cherry. I like both though and cut a lot of both out of fence rows.

Cherry hands down

Rebelduckman said:

Cherry hands down

Click to expand...

Just out of curiosity, why cherry hands down?

Firefighter938 said:

Burn wise both produce about the same amount of heat. Both season in 12 months or less. Cherry splits easy, and hackberry can be stringy. Cherry sap wood rots but the heart wood is solid. Hackberry will turn punky if not properly split/stacked quickly.

If I could only pick one of the two I would choose cherry. I like both though and cut a lot of both out of fence rows.

Click to expand...

I agree Cherry all day long. It splits better and smells good burning. Hackberry is about the same heat, but Cherry is easier and cleaner.

Firefighter938 said:

Just out of curiosity, why cherry hands down?

Click to expand...

Splits better, smells better, burns a little better. Jmho though. Nothing against hack though

I always thought hackberry was higher btu but I'm not crazy about cherry, if it's there I take it but burning cat stoves it always leaves a lot of ash. In the morning when I'd get up there would be a lot of coals but covered in a deep layer of ash with a lower firebox temp. Others may not have that problem but like I said if it's free I still take and just don't load my stove with it for an overnight burn.

I like cherry as well, but I have a non-cat.

Sweeps says both are 19.5. All things being equal, I would grab more cherry just because it smells awesome burning. So +3 or so for cherry

It seems like cherry is the favorite. I would take what ever is easier and closer to get if both burn about the same. Cherry does have a nice aroma so that is one positive.