Suggestions- Rear Exit Stoves

Hi, All-

We are thinking about possibly replacing our old stove with something more
efficient. One important concern we have- it must be a rear exit type.

Our present stove feeds through a block off plate at the top of a fireplace on the
main floor of the house using 6 inch pipe at ~20-24 in. height. That pipe angles
up ~1.5 inches over a ~3 foot run, then through a 90 degree elbow and the plate.
The stove sits on an extended flagstone hearth in front of the fireplace. Added
heat baffles protect the wood mantle above and any combustibles directly below
the stove and the flagstone. This setup has served us well, heating an ~1500
square foot rambler very comfortably.

I'm looking at the Buck 261 stove which can be optioned for rear exit. Can anyone
suggest other models to look at with rear exit? I know this greatly limits our choices.
We want a non-catalytic EPA type. Our present stove loads north-south and will
take splits up to 21-22 inches long. The firebox is close to 3 cubic feet. It looks a
bit like the Buck 261 in fact- kind of a 'shop stove' look. We're not trying to get
written up in "Better Homes..." magazine, just to heat our house. Great looks would
be viewed strictly as a bonus, not a necessity.

We have a beautiful fireplace which, alas, never drew well ( it's a 2-sided fireplace).
Designed by a relative who knew nothing about fireplaces, it is pretty but useless.
But with the wood stove, it comes alive and is quite functional. Our 'two-sided
advantage": you can put a 20 inch box fan on the back side and move a *lot*
of air through. This helps to distribute the heat well throughout the main floor.
That fan usually runs on Low and it's quiet.

Suggestions, anyone- in addition to the Buck 261? Thanks!

So far I've seen a Woodstock IS in another thread. It looks expensive.

timfromohio said:

We also wanted a rear exit stove. I looked at Jotuls (F55, F500) and Quadrafire (Explorer 2 and 3). Settled on Explorer 2.

Click to expand...

That's a beauty! Thanks.

begreen said:

What is the lintel height of the fireplace? This is the determining factor.

Click to expand...

I'll get the lintel height later today when I'm back over there- thanks!

begreen said:

What is the lintel height of the fireplace? This is the determining factor.

Click to expand...

The lintel is 41 inches above the flagstone hearth...

Thanks! Well, I'd very much like to put a 30NC in. I hear good things about
that company and that model- and I like that some of their line is also
pretty reasonably priced. I just need to think about this because my
present stove is outside the fireplace and only a short run of 6in pipe
intrudes into that space. So my starting assumption has been "stove
outside of the fireplace. Yep, need to rethink... so long as I leave it open
on both sides I can still blow air across it with a box fan. My mind is stuck
on the notion that a stove 'out in the room' is a better heater than an
insert style...

Ashful said:

It's also catalytic. I'm curious as to your desire for non-catalytic? Lots of members of this forum, who use their stove as their primary heater, have switched from non-cat to catalytic. You don't see many going the other way.

Click to expand...

Yes, I saw that right away. They describe it as a hybrid tech type. It sounds really nice
and it looks great. It's getting into that areas I consider 'a little pricey'. That being said,
if I really had my heart set on that one I could make it happen...

In my mind, the non-cat types seem more desirable because the catalytic element
can apparently be ruined by someone running the stove improperly. I hear a new one
runs like 300 dollars and up. I remember reading more than a few stories in these
forums with unhappy campers facing that very problem- bad cat element. Some were
even surprised, i.e. felt they had done everything right and were unhappy as to how
soon they were being forced to replace theirs...

Cluttermagnet said:

The lintel is 41 inches above the flagstone hearth...

Click to expand...

I forgot to mention one important detail- while it's 41 inches from lintel to hearth,
there is less vertical space up in the fireplace. I would say around 4in less.
Perhaps a brick width or so. I'll have to go back over and measure that.
At the time I measured the lintel height, it never occurred to me that it could
be 'stove inside the fireplace'. All I was concerned with was getting an angled-up
pipe to clear the lintel.

So the bottom of the fireplace is a raised brick platform, not just flagstone. And
if I remember right, that's fire brick as the platform itself. All vertical faces are
regular red brick.

In my mind's eye, I'm also picturing a 13NC in there. The house is only 1300-
1500 sf. Not really trying to heat the basement at all, just the upstairs. A 30NC
may even be more than I need. OTOH that house is very poorly insulated. Very.
It leaks like a sieve all winter long. If I ever get the time I need to improve the
insulation...

BTW I'm still picturing a plain looking Buck 261 and wondering if it would fit
up in that cavity as a top exhaust stove. It can be configured for rear exhaust
which is why I started with it in the first place. And it's a little, ah, plain- sort of
like the butt ugly stove I have in there right now. And it will load really long
splits north-south. 18-20 in stove chow is a pain if you're not set up for that
standard from the outset. I burn some pretty long splits at times.

Then there's the problem of cleanouts. If I keep the stove outside the fireplace,
I can have a cleanout tee right there. My present setup lacks that. It's still
something you can work with for cleanouts, but a tee would be soooo much
better and easier...

This is a chimney near the center of the house, not the end. That's a good thing.
But OTOH no possibility of an outside cleanout for this chimney, that's why
I'd like to add a tee in the fireplace.

Thanks! The PE Super 27 looks very nice. Some interesting reading on their
website regarding catalytic vs. non-cat. I stopped after about ten minutes, but
find the letters page so fascinating I intend to return to finish reading. Nothing
has so far changed my own gut feeling that catalytic stoves are something I'd
prefer not to get involved with. OTOH I'd probably learn and adapt just fine if
I had one. I'm quite attentive and 'hands on' during burn sessions. Wood stoves
are rather 'fiddly' things... I'm constantly fine tuning...

Oh- regarding the 'stove in the fireplace' issue, I do have quite a unique
situation with my see-through/ two-sided fireplace. Heat would get stored in the
brick chimney all right, but would also spill out constantly in copious amounts on
both sides. Or I can continue to run the box fan in the back, which would be
my preference. This pushes all the warm air towards the remaining 2/3 of the
house and that room on the other side gets heated nicely anyway.

I haven't yet decided whether there is any real benefit to me to put a new
stove in that cavity. Out front works just fine for me so far. I'm thinking real
hard about that issue.

I'm pretty open minded, really. Thanks for a well-reasoned and patient explanation.
I definitely see merit on both sides. Matter of fact, though, the idea of really long
burns is highly appealing! I have an old stove and have to rebuild the fire nearly every
time (every day). It would be great to start from a nice bed of coals. Only rarely do I
see that...

***News Flash*** ...Clutter Finally Gets His Measurements Right...

Guys- With some embarrassment I must say that I screwed up my fireplace measurements
pretty badly. I have no idea where I ever came up with that 41 inch figure! Having just
re-measured that fireplace and written it down as I should have in the first place, I can
report to you that the actual lintel height is 34 inches and the height of the brick platform
brings the opening size down to about 27 inches. The brick platform is three courses high...

So that's only 34 inches lintel height above the flagstone hearth, also a vertically narrow
cavity- the actual fireplace opening is about 27 inches. Only a 'mini' type stove could reasonably
be expected to fit in there, but I believe I need a a 60,000+ BTU class stove. So lets take this
thread back in the direction I started it: I have a working though inefficient 3 cu ft wood stove
with rear exit that sits out on an extended hearth in front of the fireplace. I'd like to replace
it with a more efficient stove (of any type really) that sits in the same place on the hearth.
I'm open to suggestions, any modern stove, really. I'm pretty sure my situation dictates rear
exit only. Top exit like with the NC30 isn't going to cut it, I don't believe. The 34 inch lintel
height is the overriding factor to consider. A shame, really, as I like the NC30. It has a good
reputation and is not real expensive.

My final thoughts- this is on the first floor of a wood frame house, the floor being standard
2x12's on 16in centers. I'd like to keep the weight down, and am thinking in terms of welded
steel construction. I'm a little uncomfortable with the thought of the added weight of
soapstone construction and such. I'd be way more comfortable with 300 lb+/-, not at all
comfortable with stoves weighing more like 600 lb... The stove sits about 1/3 of the way
out along the span of those floor joists, not quite at mid-span... I and an unlucky friend
are going to have to personally move and leverage into place whatever weight there is.
I'm in my sixties now- light build, still pretty healthy...

Right now and 'on paper', the Buck 261 is looking pretty good and is my standard of
comparison... although it has those 'shop stove' looks, it would be an improvement
over what I have now, not to mention the higher efficiency...

Rear exit changes everything.

BTW I see the Buck 261 is only rated 32,200 BTU/Hr and weighs 492 lb.
In the manual it says 11,800 to 40,900 BTU/Hr.
What I have right now is very similar, and may have about the same output.
It is doing the job, however inefficiently. I doubt it weighs quite that much. It's welded
steel and isn't up to the present 1/4in standards. More like 3/16in.

Yeah, I know- I worry too much. Matter of fact, there is a spinet style upright
piano across the room, hugging the wall opposite the fireplace. So far, in 55
years, that piano has not fallen through.

Highbeam said:

Not sure why you like the Buck so much but it seems that you really want it. Go for it. 300# for a stove is very light. That's just one fat chick. If your floor can't handle more than that then you have bigger problems. What if you had two fat chicks dancing together!

Underneath this floor in the basement/crawlspace is there an opportunity to add a beam under the 2x12 joists? I did this under my hearth to help ease my mind and prevent long term sagging.

It's not just the weight of the stove but the hearth, fuel load, and maybe one or two fat chicks backing their rumps up to the hot stove to get warm. Maybe even dancing!

Click to expand...

While it is physically possible to put a floor jack under there, it would end up
right in front of the downstairs fireplace, kind of mars the view. I store my
splits right outside, so there's less weight on the hearth. No fat chicks these
days, only a skinny little cat. I bring wood in mostly using square 10gal buckets.
The buckets are kept back a ways, so they are stressing different floor joists.

Actually, the floor is pretty stiff. Underlayment is real plywood like they still
did a lot of in the 60's. And a real Oak hardwood floor sits atop that. There is
no sense of any squeaks, give, or shimmy on any of the floors. Seems tight.
Joists are only spanning 12-14ft as I remember. I'd have to measure...
Yeah, I worry too much...