Insert Insulation - noticeable improvements?

I'm curious what kind of results you've had if you've put insulation around your insert. I would think the back and top would make the most difference but has anyone noticed significant heat output or burn time changes from insulating the sides?

I've got an exterior masonry fireplace and am trying to figure out if I'd be better off going with an insert with a bit smaller dimensions which would allow me to insulate around the sides (will have room to insulate the back/top no matter which choice), or just going with the biggest insert I can fit into the space.

So, where did you insulate (and how much) your insert, and what kind of changes have you noticed?

Thanks guys! I'm trying to decide before the end of the month and your input really helps!

redktmrider said:

I installed a block off plate and insulated around my insert with Roxul, the electric heat now kicks on at 10f outside temp vs 20f before the added insulation and plate. The exterior chimney is on a north facing wall of a two story house.

Click to expand...

Wow, that is a huge difference.

What depth of Roxul did you use?

Also, did you do the blockoff and insulation at the same time? I presume the blockoff probably added the most benefit but am trying to figure out how much improvement insulation will add. I think it might be hard to find people who have done the two procedures at different times, though

Would there be a problem with the roxul directly touching the sides of the insert?

The inserts I'm looking at will only give me maybe 2 inches on the sides, so I'd have to have some compressed roxul in there - touching the side of the insert - if that would be safe.

bholler said:

Ask the stove manufacturers they are the only ones that can tell you

Click to expand...

Thanks, I will ask them asap, as this will likely be a factor in what I decide to go with.

Mellow, you seem to have a lot of firsthand experience on a before and after, so I'd love to hear your thoughts (anyone else feel free to chime in, too!)

If you were deciding between the below two inserts, which do you think would give you more heat/longer burns?

Note, my chimney is almost completely exterior, the inner face of brick does not extend *at all* into the room (flush with adjacent walls which are built-in bookcases)

Insert A
2.35 ft box
about 1.5" on each side for durock/roxul
about 2 inches in back for durock/roxul
about 3 inches above (not including damper space)

Insert B
2.1 ft box
about 4 inches per side for durock + roxul
bout 4 inches behind for durock + roxul
about 5 inches above (not including damper space)

Obviously a 2.35ft box will give me more wood to burn, but then I could get about double the insulation on option B - so I'm thinking that could more than make up the difference. Efficiency #s and the like are almost identical on the two inserts, so the only difference (on paper at least) is firebox size and amount of space for insulation.

Thanks
-Seth

Yooper, we're looking at 1650 sq ft of total space upstairs on our ranch, with only 1050 of that being the "communal" space, and then the rest being a narrow hall that.leafs to the bathroom and bedrooms.

The fireplace itself is on the far end of the house in a 20*13 family room that is quite open (6 foot opening) to the dining and kitchen area. Then there is a living room on the front side of the house.

One thing to note is the family room was an addition behind the garage so it effectively has 3 external walls. That's why I'm thinking insulating the totally exterior masonry fireplace as well as better insulation in that room will help preserve the heat generated, and had me thinking that picking an insert that allows me to optimize for insulation is priority #1, at least when the stats are as close as they are with the two options I listed above (the Voyageur grand and Montpelier, respectively)

Some thoughts relevant to this thread...


Girlfriend and I drove about 50 miles today to check out the Montpelier. Really nice looking unit although it felt a bit cheap. The door did not feel substantial like on say, the Voyageur Grand, and the door hinges we're definitely weak. Where you could sit on the door of the Voyageur grand and I don't think it would budge, it feels like the Montpelier's would snap if you attempted the same. The door handle seemed a bit flimsy too. The rest of the unit seemed nice - really liked the look of the firebrick panels (can't think of the proper term) in the Montpelier - looks a lot nicer than standard firebrick.

If I had more clearance in my firebox my choice would be a no brainier - the Voyageur grand. I think it looks nicer and is built better....and has a bit bigger firebox. But, only with the Montpelier could I heavily insulate my totally external masonry fireplace. the bricks were so cold last year that I think heavy insulation would pay more heat dividends than a slightly bigger firebox...not to mention the Montpelier has the option for a 3" extended mount which I would go with to meet mantle clearances. That should mean more heat, too.