Interesting article about coal fly ash

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.

kennyp2339

Minister of Fire
Feb 16, 2014
5,937
07462
Study: Appalachian coal ash high in coveted rare earth elements
Energy Daily, The
Holly, Chris

In what could lead to a potential gold mine for U.S. electric utilities facing political and financial headaches over coal ash disposal, researchers for the first time have quantified the amount of rare earth elements that can be recovered in coal fly ash using common industrial techniques, with ash from Appalachian coal having the highest percentage of the metals coveted for a raft of clean energy and high-tech applications.

However, rare earths are more readily extracted from ash derived from Powder River Basin coal using current industrial processing technology, according to the research, which was published online Thursday in the journal Environmental Science and Technology by a team from Duke University and the University of Kentucky

The study measured the amount of rare earth elements in samples of ash from every major coal source in the United States, and determined how much of the elements could be extracted using a common industrial technique.

The team found that ash from coal mined in Appalachia contains the most rare earth elements, which are a group of 15 chemically similar metals, including gallium, germanium, indium, scandium, tellurium and yttrium. Their unique properties make them essential in the manufacture of wind turbines, solar panels and electric vehicle components, including batteries, and in guidance and precision instrument systems for the defense and aerospace industries, as well other high-tech industries.

Currently China controls about 95 percent of global rare earth element production, and holds at least half the world’s reserves of these metals, according to U.S. government figures. China has held those strategic reserves tightly, but in January 2015 was forced drop a long-standing export limit on rare earth elements after losing a trade case at the World Trade Organization brought by the United States and a host of other industrial nations.

Finding low-cost methods for extracting the commodities from coal ash would give the United States a valuable new source of rare earth elements--as well as provide an unexpected revenue stream for U.S. utilities struggling to manage the roughly 100 million metric tons of coal fly ash produced each year. Much of the ash is now stored in aging storage ponds—many of which have been documented as leaking toxic metals such as arsenic, iron, lead and selenium into groundwater and surface waters.

That coal and coal fly ash contain rare earth metals has been understood for decades but is now being pursued by the Energy Department because demand for those exotic materials is fast outstripping supply in a host of booming high-tech and clean energy sectors. At the same time, experts believe improved processes for extracting rare earths from certain coals and fly ash may be cost-competitive with large-scale mining operations for those metals.

DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) has launched an initiative to better understand the potential to extract those resources. The December 2015 budget agreement for fiscal year 2016 gave NETL $15 million to pursue technologies for the extraction and recovery of rare earth elements and minerals from U.S. coal and coal byproduct sources.

The Duke and University of Kentucky team constitutes the first comprehensive study to calculate the amounts of rare earth metals in different kinds of U.S. coal ash.

The researchers got their results by taking coal ash samples from power plants mostly located in the Midwest that burn coal sourced from all over the country, including the three largest sources: the Appalachian Mountains, southern and western Illinois, and the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana.

They then tested extraction of rare earth elements from ash using hydrochloric acid, which is much stronger and more efficient than typical industrial extraction methods but is too hazardous for use on a large scale.

They found that ash from Appalachian coal has the highest amount of rare earth elements at 591 parts per million (ppm), while ash from Illinois and the Powder River Basin contains 403 ppm and 337 ppm, respectively.

The team then used a common industrial extraction technique employing nitric acid to see how much rare earth elements could be recovered. Appalachian ash had the lowest extraction percentages, while Powder River Basin ash had the highest. The study said this might be because the rare earth elements in the Appalachian ash are encapsulated within a glassy matrix of aluminum silicates, which nitric acid does not dissolve well.

“One reason to pick coal ash from the Appalachian Mountains would be for its high rare earth element content, but you’d have to use a recovery method other than nitric acid,” said Hsu-Kim, an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at Duke who also holds an appointment in Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment.

“For any future venture to begin an extraction program, the recovery method will need to be tailored to the specific chemistry of the coal ash being used.”

The researchers tried “roasting” the ash with an alkali agent before dissolving it with nitric acid, and while this process hadn’t been optimized for recovery purposes, the tests showed a marked improvement in extraction efficiency, they said.

“The reagents we used are probably too expensive to use on an industrial scale, but there are many similar chemicals,” Hsu-Kim said. “The trick will be exploring our options and developing technologies to drive the costs down. That way we can tap into this vast resource that is currently just sitting around in disposal ponds.”

http://www.theenergydaily.com/publi...igh-in-coveted-rare-earth-elements_14114.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kennyp2339

Minister of Fire
Feb 16, 2014
5,937
07462
I copied and pasted this - this is not my writing
 

sportbikerider78

Minister of Fire
Jun 23, 2014
2,493
Saratoga, NY
There is a massive lake in China (where almost all of the rare earth magnets are mined) filled with waste. This is where the rare earth magnets come from that are used in wind turbine generators. Only place you can really get them.
Total environmental impact needs to be considered when making decisions on where energy comes from.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/mos...er-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html
 

semipro

Minister of Fire
Jan 12, 2009
4,063
SW Virginia
Thanks for posting the article.
Its interesting that at least some of waste of the past increases in value as tech improves creating both demand and cost-effective recycling.
 

kennyp2339

Minister of Fire
Feb 16, 2014
5,937
07462
I'm just getting ready for bed, but fly ash is a huge concern to me, I first became aware of its major implications to contamination a few years back when 60 mins did a report siteing duke energy, then I took a look at my profession which is in the nations 5th largest utitly and wondered what my company does with there waste.
 

iamlucky13

Minister of Fire
Jan 27, 2015
652
Western Washington
I copied and pasted this - this is not my writing

The best way to do share articles is post a short excerpt, and then provide a link to the full article. This avoids any real copyright concerns.

Burning coal effortlessly removes most of the material (mainly carbon) and leaves behind a lot of trace elements, now concentrated because all the other stuff has been removed. That's good from the perspective of creating a potential new source for elements that don't exist in high concentrations in nature, but bad from the perspective that many of these minerals are environmentally hazardous. Fortunately, we don't have to burn coal specifically to get these minerals. We've got plenty of existing ash. And if they can find uses for other minerals in coal ash besides the rare earth elements, the economic case could be stronger.

The challenge here is that China has done extremely little to manage the waste or control the emissions from their rare earth extraction facilities. Between the cost saved on pollution controls and low labor costs, they can undercut anybody else's prices. In recent years, China has gone back and forth between limiting production to deliberately favor Chinese businesses (effectively restricting exports so foreign manufacturers can't buy the minerals), and flooding the market to kill off foreign competitors.

A rare earth mine in California was the largest producer of rare earth elements in the world for decades, but between increasing mining regulations and foreign competition, closed in 2002. When China cut down exports in 2007, the owners made plan to re-open the mine. It took 5 years to go through the permitting and prep work, opening 2012. Then China flooded the market again and they went bankrupt last year.

The conditions are significantly different between the two sites, even though most of the mining done in California was before several recent rounds of new environmental regulations:

Baotou, China:
https://goo.gl/maps/Hbk5YSqTkhn

Mountain Pass, California:
https://goo.gl/maps/DUvVnL4vxbE2
 

7acres

Minister of Fire
Dec 5, 2013
653
South East USA
Good to see another potential upside to cheap and simple coal power.
 

ihookem

Minister of Fire
Jan 25, 2009
675
Allenton, Wisconsin
Kenny, tonight when you go to bed you dont have to worry about fly ash. As for me it is the last thing on my mind when I'm going to bed. I have seen so many mason blocks made from coal ash or fly ash in Milwaukee. It is all over and am sure it's used for something. Also I , dont believe 60 minutes for one minute none the less 60.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.