TANSTAF1 said:
Is there a good overall guide that provides the basic pros and cons of cast iron versus steel plate stoves/inserts, EPA versus non-EPA ones, cat versus non-cat, clay flues versus SS liners versus double walled versus insulated, etc.? Are there any that provide general caveats such as double doors versus single, the inability to use wetter wood in EPA stoves, etc.? Are there any websites that as impartially as possible review stoves and inserts?
If you do a search or check some of the forums here you'll soon learn that most everyone is convinced that the stove they bought is the perfect stove . . . since obviously none of us would be so dumb to go out and buy any stove and then find out it wasn't rightfor us.
All kidding aside . . . there is no perfect stove. What we do see is that in certain years there will be a strong following for certain brands. This year it seemed like Woodstock stoves and Blaze Kings were in favor . . . in the past Pacific Energy stoves were the darling bud of the wood burning crowd here.
Steel vs. cast iron vs. soapstone vs. titanium (OK, I made that last one up). . . ah, well that would be opening Pandora's Box yet again. There are folks who swear by soapstone . . . and folks who prefer steel. There are folks who say one type heats up better than another or stays heated longer . . . or is more rugged . . . or is better looking . . . or . . . well you get the idea. My own opinion in the admittedly short time I've been burning . . . it doesn't matter so much for the material as it does for the quality of construction. Sure, some may stay warmer longer and some folks may find one type prettier than another, but at the end of a long and cold winter day the fact is any quality stove built of steel, cast iron or stone with a proper fire in it (i.e. being run correctly) will keep you and your loved ones safe and warm. I could go over the oft quoted "facts" on how the different types of stoves heat longer, or how the heat is different, or how some may need to be maintained more often . . . but honestly this is where you need to do your own search and then form your own opinion . . . since many of these "facts" are in fact opinions of the owners.
EPA vs. Non-EPA . . . this one to me is a no-brainer. Non-EPA stoves = you will burn more wood and have more pollutants in the air. On the plus side, they're usually cheaper. Me . . . I'm lazy . . . if I can get a stove that produces more heat and at the same time burn less wood AND at the same time I'm doing the green thing with less pollutants . . . well I'm all for that. Honestly, EPA stoves are the way to go . . . burning less wood = more time to do fun things with the family and/or less money spent on firewood vs. spending more time and/or money cutting/buying firewood. As I said, more heat + less wood + less pollution = happiness . . . plus you'll end up feeling pretty smug with yourself when you drive by your neighbor's homes and see the smoke spilling out of the chimney in giant plumes while your home is toasty warm and no one can tell you're even running your woodstove.
Cat vs. Non-cat . . . ah, the second Great Debate. Again, there are pros- and cons- and many, many opinions. My own view . . . I went with the non-cat, secondary burn tech and I'm happy . . . although part of the reason for my decision was based on negative reviews of cats from their early years. Nowadays, if I was to look at a stove today, I don't know if I would go with a cat or not . . . but I would certainly not automatically rule out a stove with a cat. Again, a search on this topic will yield many opinions on this topic and you can make up your own mind.
Chimney . . . I went with an insulated stainless steel since it was easier and better for me in my own case. If I was to build a home today I would probably go with masonry with an insulated metal liner for the performance and look of the traditional chimney . . . but that's just me.
Doors . . . Double doors, single doors, top loaders, side loaders . . . all a matter of preference . . . a lot is what folks first learned to burn on. I grew up with side loaders and as a result I wanted a side loader. Folks who started out with a top loader often want a top loader and folks who have always had front loaders have no issues with front loaders.
Wet wood and EPA stoves . . . OK, no debate here. Unseasoned wood (I prefer this term to wet wood since wet wood to me could be seasoned or unseasoned wood that is simply covered in rain or snow) in EPA stoves is not a good idea. Doing so with some stoves could lead to premature failure of components at the worse and at best attempting to burn unseasoned wood will result in not as much heat and mucho frustration with the "new-fangled" stoves.
Impartial stove reviews: Is there a place . . . yup . . . and you found it . . . sort of, kind of. There is no such thing as an impartial review, but what you will find on the main page of hearth.com is a stove ratings section where many actual users (members) of this site have taken the time to log on and give a review of their stove they are currently using or a stove they did use. Most are brutally honest with what they like or dislike about their stove . . .