Rick, I have always preferred the Classic to the Fireview, although that is the stove we have in our home. The Fireview was the stove the husband wanted and since getting him to even think about something other than a yard sale special was a challenge I was not about to question his choice! It's handsome, too, no doubt about it.
But my own aesthetic tends toward the beautiful tile stoves seen in the palaces of Scandinavia, Russia, and northern Europe. I like the size and proportions of the Woodstock Classic. And I think the careful attention to detail on the trim castings and the legs showcases the beauty of the soapstone perfectly. For me, viewing the dancing flames is not important. It is subtle, elegant, and sophisticated and perfect in a space that is intended to be bright, clean, and stylish. First time visitors are often surprised that it's actually a woodstove.
Had Woodstock made a something similar in the size range of the either the Keystone or Palladian I would have considered that as the Classic is a bit more stove than the space really requires. It's nice to know someone else who has a Classic, most people are surprised I didn't jump for another Fireview.