Why is a cord 4 feet wide?
- Thread starter bokehman
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil. -
Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
- Status
Quick! Rearrange it or you'll be short this winter- LOL
I believe that the etymology of the word has to do with a cord that was used to measure out the stack. Probably a 4' cord. Stacking it thusly allowed for easy measurement to a standard.
I believe that the etymology of the word has to do with a cord that was used to measure out the stack. Probably a 4' cord. Stacking it thusly allowed for easy measurement to a standard.
It sucks because most people cut wood to 16" lengths. If you stack wood in 2 rows you would have 32" worth of depth to your pile. It would then take 6' of height and 8' of width to complete a full cord. This is how I stack, because I cut to 16" lengths.
2.6666666666 x 6 x 8 =128
2.6666666666 x 6 x 8 =128
OMG..we have an even bigger problem! What about all those people that stacked their wood in an HH? It is not even in a square pile..They are going to freeze!
Don't you think the imperial and US measuring systems go from bizarre to completely ridiculous. I mean why 128 cubic feet anyway?Adios Pantalones said:
Here firewood is sold by the kilogram. You reserve it in the spring and then late summer or early autumn you go to the wood yard and select the pieces you want. Take a maul and break open a few splits to measure the water content and then make a pile which the guy drops at your house. It's split in the spring so it's almost seasoned by October (no rain and desert sun).
bokehman said:
Yup, it does. It's all tradition going way back. Farenheit scale is based on something like the blood temp of a sheep (100) and the freezing point of some salt water concentration. The length of a king's arm, the weight of some sacred cow poop, the circumfrence of someone's head- those are the sort of standards they're based on.
Shoe sizes are based on the length of some bean or something. I wonder what size shoe a Yeti wears... I assume snow shoes...
It's just a datum. The best thing about metric is easy conversion of units and no need for adding strange constants when doing calculations. It's so simple. Water, 1ml = 1cc = 1 gram; 1 litre = 1 kilo; 1000 kilos = 1 ton; etc. Freezing point 0C, boiling 100C.fossil said:
Being a Brit I was brought up imperial. When I was a kid there were 960 farthings, 240 pence, 20 shillings or 4 crowns in a pound. There were even a 3 penny and 6 penny coins. Then the currency was changed to 100 pence in the pound and the shop owners made a killing.
Don't forget the rod:
The rod is a unit of length equal to 5.5 yards, 11 cubits, 5.0292 meters, 16.5 feet, or 1⁄320 of a statute mile. A rod is the same length as a perch and a pole. The lengths of the perch (one rod) and chain (four rods) were standardized in 1607 by Edmund Gunter. In old English, the term lug is also used.
The length is equal to the standardized length of the ox goad used by medieval English ploughmen; fields were measured in acres which were one chain (four rods) by one furlong (in the United Kingdom, ten chains).
Because the furlong was "one plough's furrow long" and a furrow was the length a plough team was to be driven without resting, the length of the furlong and the acre vary regionally, nominally due to differing soil types. In England the acre was 4,840 square yards, but in Scotland it was 6,150 square yards and in Ireland 7,840 square yards. In all three countries, fields were divided in acres and thus the furlong became a measure commonly used in horse racing, archery, and civic planning.
Thank you Wikipedia
The rod is a unit of length equal to 5.5 yards, 11 cubits, 5.0292 meters, 16.5 feet, or 1⁄320 of a statute mile. A rod is the same length as a perch and a pole. The lengths of the perch (one rod) and chain (four rods) were standardized in 1607 by Edmund Gunter. In old English, the term lug is also used.
The length is equal to the standardized length of the ox goad used by medieval English ploughmen; fields were measured in acres which were one chain (four rods) by one furlong (in the United Kingdom, ten chains).
Because the furlong was "one plough's furrow long" and a furrow was the length a plough team was to be driven without resting, the length of the furlong and the acre vary regionally, nominally due to differing soil types. In England the acre was 4,840 square yards, but in Scotland it was 6,150 square yards and in Ireland 7,840 square yards. In all three countries, fields were divided in acres and thus the furlong became a measure commonly used in horse racing, archery, and civic planning.
Thank you Wikipedia
I believe the measurement of a cord goes back to the day 40+ years ago when pulpwood was cut 4' long. Back then it was all hand loaded on trucks . I think the machinery in the paper mills back then were only capable of handling the short lenghts .A logger would get paid by the 4' cord when delivered to the mill.
I think alot of these sort of numbers are based on the simple doubling of another number. 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128.
So is it cords or ricks?
So is it cords or ricks?
word use to define a unit of wood fuel measure goes back to 1616: defined as a volume equivalent to two four foot cubes.
maybe people walked around with four foot long lengths of rope cord with knots at different spots to measure different things "accurately".
I wonder if cords got misplaced like my tape rules do.
maybe people walked around with four foot long lengths of rope cord with knots at different spots to measure different things "accurately".
I wonder if cords got misplaced like my tape rules do.
I go by fence length. I need one fence length to get thru winter.
If my stack goes from that spot along the fence to that other spot along the fence, I have enough wood. If it goes past that spot, I have extra. If it doesn't make it to the spot, I need more.
If my stack goes from that spot along the fence to that other spot along the fence, I have enough wood. If it goes past that spot, I have extra. If it doesn't make it to the spot, I need more.
bokehman said:
I could't agree with you more. As a student of science & engineering, I grew to deeply appreciate the SI (metric) system of units, and I think my country is pretty dumb not to have converted to it. BTW, the number I quoted about the distance light travels is the current internationally accepted definition of the meter (or metre, if you prefer). Gotta start somwhere...or go back & redefine the start, as it were. Rick
LEES WOOD-CO said:
That's the same direction I was headed in. Wasn't that long ago most "pulp wood" was in 4 ft lengths. Even when it was handled with a loader.
We still got some deeds that still have "rods" "chains" etc .
- Status
Similar threads
