Splitting Firewood Book -- What I Learned

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.
WarmGuy

WarmGuy

Minister of Fire
Jan 30, 2006
519
Far Northern Calif. Coast
Just finished a good book called "Splitting Firewood" by David Tresemer. The author did a lot of careful testing to determine the efficiency of different splitting methods. Thought I'd pass on some of his conclusions.

TOOL COMPARISON (Time to split 1/5 cord)

Hydraulic Splitter: 30 minutes
Splitting maul: 34
Monster Maul: 34
Chopper 1: 35
Wedge on Handle: 46
Felling Ax 46
Sledgehammer and Wedges: 49
Wedge on Stand: 52

SHOULD YOU SPLIT FROM BOTTOM OR TOP (i.e. in direction of growth or not)

Conclusion: No, it makes no difference

SHOULD YOU SPLIT ALONG CHECK LINES (i.e. split along cracks that are appearing in the log)

Conclusion: Yes, it's a good idea

DOES FROZEN GREEN WOOD SPLIT BETTER THAN THAWED GREEN WOOD

Conclusion: No. However, knotty pieces split slightly faster when thawed, and straight-grain split slightly faster when frozen)

HOW LONG DO YOU NEED TO DRY THE WOOD?

1 foot long split wood reached equilibrium dryness (by measuring weight) after only about 3.5 months. This is for wood that is stacked off the ground, and covered. He doesn't mention humidity. See graph.
 

Attachments

  • FirewoodDryingChart.jpg
    FirewoodDryingChart.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 756
I take exception to his findings in only one area. Sections with crotches or where limbs have been definately split better bottom up.

Well, that and the fact that the guy with the splitter will be splitting wood for hours after the guy with the maul has had to flop on the couch. Or in my case go to the ICU.
 
The numbers don't sound right - Hydraulic Splitter: 30 minutes for 1/5 of a cord that 2.5 hour per cord. That seems slow.
 
johnsopi said:
The numbers don't sound right - Hydraulic Splitter: 30 minutes for 1/5 of a cord that 2.5 hour per cord. That seems slow.
Click to expand...

Around here that is about right with the splitter. Three beers.

With a maul. A week or so. A case.
 
Perhaps that chap (or lady) does not know very well how to split wood! Especially using a hydraulic splitter. If it took that long to split a cord of wood, I certainly would find a better way. Methinks most of his figures are pretty sad, but we don't know much about the fellow or lady who was doing the splitting. Also, what length was the wood that he was splitting? It certainly is easier to split a 12" log versus an 18" one.

Did that author by any chance state what wood he was splitting? Did he state that some wood splits better through the heart and others on the edge?
 
Interesting results.Either his splitter is slow or I'm tougher than I thought.I'll bet a seasoned cord of sugar-maple I could outdo that particular splitter with my 8lb. maul; if I had a good night's sleep, and a good breakfast, and a load of gun-barrel pinewood,and there wasn't a cold beer in sight. :smirk:
 
downeast said:
Some nice info along with the stats about drying.
Most of us that have cut our own for heating do it many ways. Good beer is usually a vital part of the process.....that's why the splitting tools take time. :wow:
How is it that our tiny tiny wimpy electric/hydraulic splitters were not in the mix in this tome ? Our DR baby 4 ton replaced an oh-so-big 12 HP gas monster in 2000. It has , yes slower, split 95% of the 5-7 cords/year with enjoyment. No noise, no fumes, no high maintenance. Plug it into a regular 15a, check the hydraulic oil level, place butt ( the wood %-P ) on the DR, press controls, split. Place micro brew on the table, find a good FM station, sing if able, stop anytime. The DR is a well-made tool ( Italy) , safe since you need both hands on the controls, backup by DR with great support and parts (needed only once), and rugged enough for the heavy use each year. It is over used for its design and function, but performs. Frankly, I don't give a D about speed.
After spending a good part of every winter felling, clearing, brush burning, bucking for firewood and 4' pulp, carrying, transporting the butts to the "pile", I'm not ready to split until late summer or early fall. You do harvest in the winter don't you ? So the "pile" sits proudly until the next stage of splitting, stacking in the pole woodshed and house shed. The extra few months of drying in the fall do the job enough for the winter's fuel.
The unsplittable 5% SOB's get the monster maul or wedges and sledge treatment. Some of the real B_____d's just get thrown to be Semtexed, "fire in the hole".
...and that's all folks.
Click to expand...
Do you imply that cutting, splitting, stacking could fit in with the rythym of life, even be enjoyable? What about compulsion to get er done! What about obsession??!! My world is about to crumble.. I know I can do it faster, better, bigger !!!! Don't give a damn bout speed, what's wrong with people,, geez...fm radio...microbrew..hmmph..
 
I would think it would be obvious, one can easily split a firewood book as long as one does so with the pages. If you attempt to go accross the pages it will just make a big mess!

I don't know why you need to READ the book to figure this out! :lol: %-P

Gooserider
 
NewtownPA said:
I also notice that the months "June" and "October" are mysteriously absent from the X scale...
Click to expand...

The data points are 36 days apart. So, for example, May 29 is one data point, and July 4 is the next.

His point was indeed that wood doesn't need a full year to season, at least in that test environment.
 
It might help to report that the book was printed in 1981, so a lot of things have changed since then as far as splitters, technology, etc.
 
Sounds like the splitter they used had a 30 second recycle time.
 
BeGreen said:
Sounds like the splitter they used had a 30 second recycle time.
Click to expand...

Are you sure it had an engine? It might have been one Like this :exclaim:

Gooserider
 
it takes a pretty big splitter to split wood faster than a man in good physical condition can split it.

it's all about cycle time, if you have some nice straight grained stuff that splits easily, you can outrun most "affordable" splitters.

me, i'm not far from the ICU these days, like was mentioned above!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

S
My opinion of the Champion 27 ton log splitter from Home Depot.
Replies
18
Views
20K
The Gear
salecker
salecker
M
Processing firewood for beginners
Replies
76
Views
7K
The Wood Shed
SpaceBus
SpaceBus
C
What do I need to retrieve and split wood?
Replies
43
Views
4K
The Wood Shed
Easy Livin’ 3000
Easy Livin’ 3000
Poindexter
Fiskars X27, yet another positive review
Replies
18
Views
4K
The Gear
bboulier
B
Hasufel
Drying test results are in...
Replies
29
Views
5K
The Wood Shed
Hasufel
Hasufel
Top Bottom
Back